Advanced Scouting: Charlotte Bobcats at San Antonio Spurs
Charlotte Bobcats at San Antonio Spurs 7:30 CST March 19, 2011
Charlotte: -3.62 (23rd)
San Antonio: 6.15 (4th)
All statistics are prior to last night’s game.
Player summary statistics from basketball-reference.com and basketballvalue.com:
Charlotte Bobcats Player Ratings 3-17
| Player | G | MPG | USG% | Ortg | DRtg | WS/48 | 2 Yr APM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D.J. Augustin | 67 | 33.4 | 20.9 | 114 | 111 | 0.122 | -3.78 |
| Gerald Wallace | 48 | 39 | 20.1 | 105 | 105 | 0.099 | 5.25 |
| Boris Diaw | 67 | 33.6 | 16.5 | 105 | 108 | 0.078 | 1.06 |
| Kwame Brown | 52 | 23.3 | 15 | 109 | 107 | 0.1 | -7.3 |
| Stephen Jackson | 62 | 36.5 | 27.3 | 99 | 108 | 0.05 | -1.49 |
| Tyrus Thomas | 37 | 21.5 | 25 | 101 | 101 | 0.106 | -1.09 |
| Shaun Livingston | 67 | 17.3 | 19.6 | 102 | 107 | 0.068 | 1.71 |
| Nazr Mohammed | 51 | 16.7 | 22.2 | 102 | 104 | 0.086 | -3.24 |
| Gerald Henderson | 53 | 21.8 | 19.2 | 102 | 108 | 0.062 | 0.68 |
| D.J. White | 9 | 20.7 | 17.6 | 123 | 105 | 0.179 | N/A |
| Dominic McGuire | 39 | 14.2 | 14 | 92 | 105 | 0.034 | N/A |
| Matt Carroll | 39 | 9.3 | 19.2 | 98 | 108 | 0.043 | N/A |
| Eduardo Najera | 28 | 12.5 | 11.6 | 96 | 108 | 0.036 | -3.32 |
The Bobcats are not the same defensive team without Gerald Wallace.
San Antonio Spurs Player Ratings 3-17
| Player | G | MPG | USG% | Ortg | DRtg | WS/48 | 2 Yr APM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tony Parker | 65 | 32.2 | 25.2 | 114 | 107 | 0.165 | -0.86 |
| Manu Ginobili | 67 | 30.9 | 26.3 | 116 | 104 | 0.199 | 5.28 |
| Richard Jefferson | 66 | 30.8 | 15.5 | 115 | 108 | 0.117 | -0.82 |
| Tim Duncan | 67 | 28.7 | 22.9 | 109 | 100 | 0.165 | 6.47 |
| George Hill | 61 | 28.2 | 17.7 | 115 | 107 | 0.136 | -1.74 |
| DeJuan Blair | 67 | 21.9 | 20.3 | 106 | 99 | 0.14 | -0.45 |
| Matt Bonner | 51 | 21.5 | 12.8 | 131 | 107 | 0.162 | 3.62 |
| Gary Neal | 65 | 20.5 | 20.5 | 109 | 108 | 0.1 | -1.22 |
| Antonio McDyess | 61 | 18.1 | 15 | 105 | 103 | 0.106 | 2.18 |
| James Anderson | 18 | 12.4 | 15.1 | 110 | 109 | 0.084 | N/A |
| Tiago Splitter | 47 | 11 | 17.5 | 111 | 103 | 0.139 | N/A |
| Steve Novak | 13 | 6.7 | 14.6 | 139 | 109 | 0.189 | N/A |
| Chris Quinn | 39 | 6.6 | 16.3 | 96 | 109 | 0.027 | N/A |
Player trends, based on Efficiency per 48 minutes:
Charlott Bobcats Player Trends 3-17
| Player | Season | Last 10 | Increase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eduardo Najera | 12.2 | 16 | 3.8 |
| Matt Carroll | 15.4 | 17.2 | 1.8 |
| Shaun Livingston | 19.9 | 21.1 | 1.2 |
| Gerald Henderson | 17.4 | 17 | -0.4 |
| Stephen Jackson | 20.2 | 18.5 | -1.7 |
| D.J. Augustin | 21.5 | 19.3 | -2.2 |
| Boris Diaw | 19.9 | 17.4 | -2.5 |
| Kwame Brown | 20.7 | 16.8 | -3.9 |
| Dominic McGuire | 18.5 | 13.9 | -4.6 |
| Tyrus Thomas | 28.1 | 14.6 | -13.5 |
San Antonio Spurs Player Trends 3-17
| Player | Season | Last 10 | Increase |
|---|---|---|---|
| DeJuan Blair | 28.3 | 32.2 | 3.9 |
| Matt Bonner | 20.3 | 23.3 | 3 |
| Tiago Splitter | 22.2 | 25.1 | 2.9 |
| Manu Ginobili | 28.3 | 31 | 2.7 |
| Gary Neal | 18.7 | 20.2 | 1.5 |
| Steve Novak | 19.8 | 19.5 | -0.3 |
| Antonio McDyess | 23.3 | 22.7 | -0.6 |
| Tony Parker | 27.1 | 25.1 | -2 |
| Tim Duncan | 32.4 | 30.4 | -2 |
| James Anderson | 13.6 | 9.9 | -3.7 |
| George Hill | 22.2 | 18.1 | -4.1 |
| Richard Jefferson | 17.8 | 11.8 | -6 |
| Chris Quinn | 12.3 | 3.3 | -9 |
Lineup data
Most valuable/utilized lineups:
Bobcats:
Augustin, Jackson, Wallace, Diaw, Brown -59 in 364 minutes (-9.3 per 100 possessions)
Augustin, Jackson, Wallace, Diaw, Mohammed -12 in 363 minutes (-1.4 per 100)
Augustin, Henderson, Jackson, Diaw, Brown -41 in 157 minutes (-12.8 per 100)
Augustin, Henderson, Jackson, Wallace, Diaw +27 in 57 minutes (+23.6 per 100)
Diaw at Center: +4.1 per 100 in 672 MP
Diaw at PF: -7.3 per 100 in 1,577 MP
Spurs:
Parker, Ginobili, Jefferson, Blair, Duncan +147 in 669 minutes (+10.4 per 100)
Parker, Ginobili, Jefferson, McDyess, Duncan +29 in 147 minutes (+10.2 per 100)
Hill, Neal, Ginobili, Bonner, McDyess +65 in 101 minutes (+35.3 per 100)
Preferred method to create shots: Stephen Jackson on isolations and post-ups
Depending on whom you talk to Stephen Jackson is either among the most overrated or under appreciated players in the game. Many observers like his versatility, production and ability to create. Other, including many statheads, believes he is a model for inefficient scorers whose perceived value is derived from jacking up a ton of shots, despite all of the missed shots and turnovers that hurt his team along the way.
Ben Gordon has a career Offensive Rating of 106. Carmelo Anthony checked in at 107. Even Allen Iverson had a rating of 105. Stephen Jackson’s Offensive Rating of 101 pales in comparison even to these noted inefficient “ballhogs”. Despite this dismal efficiency, Jackson actually appears to have more offensive value than you would expect. Now, I’m not suggesting he would that a good offensive team like the Spurs should target him (although he did tag along for the title run in 2003), but the Bobcats’ enemic offense would likely be even worse without him.
Stephen Jackson’s 5 year adjusted plus minus (which is much more reliable than 1 and 2 year figures) estimates him as a player of average to above average offensive value (and average defensive value). More interesting, however, is the fact that the Bobcats have scored more than 4 points more per 100 possessions when Jackson is on the floor for both 2009/10 and this season (his defensive on court/off court figures are not as favorable).
There are several reasons that Jackson has more offensive value than his box score statistics would suggest. Much is made about the value of shot creation and Jackson clearly has that ability. Jackson typically takes close to 20% of his shots near the end of the shot clock, which definitely helps take the sting out of his low shooting percentage. Amazingly, this season Jackson’s effective FG% is higher at the end of the shot clock. In 5 isolation plays per game, Jackson averages 0.86 points per possession (PPP). He also averages 0.92 PPP in about 2 post ups per game. Both rates are very respectable.
Additionally, although Jackson commits a lot of passing turnovers, his assists are arguably among the most valuable in the NBA. Approximately 1/3rd of the NBA’s assists lead to layups or dunks. Jackson’s assists lead to close shots an impressive 56% of the time. Last year, it was 68%. In the past, I have estimated that a close assist indicates as much as 5 times more value than assists on jump shots. (This is primarily because an assist on a jump shot will typically come with many untracked passes leading to missed shots). This season, Jackson even average more close assists than Lebron James.
DJ Augustin is probably the only other Bobcats player who is a better offensive player than their owner. (I’m mostly joking about that.) Augustin is not the most productive point guard and might not create as many easy scores as Jackson, but he is very efficient and probably the Bobcats’ best three point option.
Spurs defensive strategy: Defend Jackson with Hill and entice him to take jumpers on isolations
I realize that the Spurs may be more interested in getting their roster playoff ready; but I’ve done reports for every other team, so I think I’ll just pretend they are intend to make adjustments to improve their chances against the Bobcats, if needed.
Stephen Jackson likes to pass out of the post more often than he passes out of isolations. However, Jackson’s passes out of the post tend to be kickouts and less deadly than his passes on isolation plays. Additionally, his passes to cuts from the post are when many of his turnovers occur. When Jackson tries to finish from the blocks himself, he likes to either take a jumper or drive to the hoop. He usually drives left, but he can also be effective going right on the baseline.
George Hill seems to continually improve defensively. He is a tough defender in the post, but his size could entice Jackson to test Hill’s defensively on the blocks. With Jackson posting up, his passing value should be diminished. (However, opponents have experiences success attempting to score on Hill in the post.)
Hill has also become a very good defender on isolations. Once again, the size difference could entice Jackson into a less effective option, the jump shot. Jackson isn’t a terrible jump shooter, but he is nothing special from three point range and becomes a very dangerous passer when driving to the basket.
If the Spurs need to set up their defensive rotations to leave any Bobcats player, Kwame Brown would be the least punishing option. Although most of Brown’s scores come from easy assisted layups or dunks, he somehow manages to keep his shooting percentage below 50%.
Spurs offensive game plan: Attack Augustin and Kwame Brown on pick and rolls
Although the Bobcats rank in the top half defensively, the trade of Gerald Wallace to the Trail Blazers should have a significant negative impact on their defensive performance (especially with Przybilla out indefinitely). After winning 17 of their first 30 games after Paul Silas took the coaching reigns from Larry Brown, Charlotte has lost 8 of their last 10 coinciding with Wallace’s trade.
DJ Augustin and Kwame Brown are two defensive liabilities for the Bobcats. Both players struggle defending the pick and roll. Augustin has allowed 0.91 PPP when defending the pick and roll ball man over the last two seasons. Kwame has historically struggled defending the ballhandler more than the roll man, so George Hill and Tony Parker will be better good options to run the pick and roll since they prefer to finish the play themselves.
Augustin also struggles defending isolations. His opponents scored an average of 0.98 PPP when isolated against him over the past 2 seasons. Both Hill and Parker should look to take advantage of this weakness.
The Pick
Spurs
At the moment, the Spurs might be slightly less than 100% as they look ahead towards the playoffs, but the Bobcats are looking forward to next season(s). A back-to-back might be a good opportunity to rest the vets, but the Spurs would even have a good shot without their best lineup.