Austin Nichols: Breaking In

by

As promised, we’re back with another look at the summer of French League MVP Austin Nichols. Nichols, who has been a busy little bee, just completed a Spurs mini camp. His hope is to stick with the team for summer league and training camp, but he’s on more than one radar. Teams are interested in the sharp shooting wing. Last week he participated in a short camp in Dallas and he has a camp in Cleveland on the 27th and 28th of this month.

This is a summer of big opportunities for Austin, and he’s doing his best to make the most of it. Prior to his mini-camp tour, Nichols spent time with trainer Phil Handy. We spoke briefly about what he was working on to improve his game, and he was kind enough to describe his typical day.

“In the morning I’m hitting the weights pretty hard. Really working on trying to improve my upper body strength and my core. The idea is to become more explosive. After the weights, we’re doing pool workouts to improve my endurance,” he began.

“After we’re through with all that, I hit the court with Phil.  We work on my footwork (both shooting and ball handling) as well as ball handling itself.  I have to tighten up my footwork so I can do everything faster while staying efficient.  I know that’s what the NBA demands. I also work on my ball handling because I have to get better at creating space for myself and my shot.”

That’s sounds like a full day, but part of the benefit of working with a trainer is pushing yourself a little harder. So, I wasn’t surprised to learn that Nichols’ days extended into the evening.

“At night, I come back to the gym just to get some shots up. I’m working on getting out of my comfort zone while trying to maintain my speed, form and follow through when I’m tired.”

Austin Nichols is an accomplished professional basketball player, but not all professional leagues are created equal. And the one constant I hear from him is his desire to work as hard as he can to make an NBA roster. But you know what they say about all work and no play. I was happy to learn that Austin took a short vacation between the conclusion of his season and joining Phil Handy in Menlo Park.

Clearly, Nichols is putting in the time to get better on the court. I was curious if he had begun to gear himself up for the mental rigors of the process he is now undertaking.

“The mental process I like to take is being over prepared. I try to push myself beyond my capabilities so that I can be as prepared as possible. And I try to block out any negative thoughts, trying my hardest to keep a positive state of mind and leave it all on the court.”

Discouragements do come. Nichols inbound flight to Dallas was delayed, forcing him to arrive late to the start of their mini-camp. But he’s upbeat. He sent a message from his iPhone at the conclusion of his first day of Spurs camp to check in and say things were going well.

Woody Allen once joked that those who can’t do, teach. And those who can’t teach, teach gym. Did all my questions about metal preparedness and drills and diet come across as analysis paralysis to Nichols?

“I think that people like you do their job, and it’s your job to analyze. It’s inevitable that some over analyzing occurs, but as a player all you can do is play. That’s what being a professional is to me. Being able to do your job regardless of what is said or what’s going on.”

So, what would surprise me? What is missed in all the gym teacher questions?

“I don’t know if this would qualify as a surprise, but it’s important for a basketball player to refine all the things that don’t show up in the box score. You have to be a perfectionist. Phil constantly tells me how it’s important to be sharp and efficient at the little aspects of the game (footwork, ball handing, etc) because once you’re good at those things you can build and become a better player. So when going through a drill I try to pay attention to every detail of the move that I’m doing to get it as sharp and efficient as I can. So, it’s not just about making shots. It’s about the good foot work that creates the space to make the shot. We work hard at those things.”

Austin and I plan to talk later this week about the specifics of a Spurs mini camp. For now, he’s heading back to the gym prior to Cleveland. Look for another update shortly.

  • metalandganja

    sounds like he’d make a great spur. personally, i got a little giddy when he correctly used “regardless”. =D

  • Cam H.

    thanks for all the hard work you are doing, it’s nice to see what the possible future prospects are up to

  • BlaseE

    do you know what his salary range would be if he got an offer from a team?

  • CMoney

    I really like this kid. He sounds intelligent, humble and comes across as an extremely hard worker. And his shot is looks like a combination of Rip Hamilton and Reggie Miller. He needs to be on our roster next year.

  • BlaseE

    I’ve never really paid too much attention in the offseason before this year, so here is another quick question about guys like Nicholls. He is trying to get into a training camp for an NBA team. Three teams are currently working him out. Let’s say he gets two invitations, does he basically choose whichever team is more likely to sign him or could the other team still have an interest in signing him even if he attended another team’s camp? Basically, does he forfeit all chances with all other teams (at that time) once he picks a camp to attend? If he goes to say the Cavs camp and then doesn’t make their team, then the Spurs probably couldn’t offer him a contract. He’s above the D-League so his best option would be to go back to Europe.

    I really think the Spurs need a guy like Nicholls though. At 27, he is young enough to play 38 minutes a game at a French League MVP level but not so green where he is like a rookie project like Casspi or Jerebko could be even if we got them.

  • http://www.48minutesofhell.com Timothy Varner

    BlaseE,

    Well, he and his agent would have to think those things through. But yes, two offers would become the better of two options. But the thing to remember is that even though he’s playing for team Y’s summer league/camp, he’s actually auditioning for several other teams. Scouts will be in Vegas, and they’ll be at the preseason games. So, the exposure is a big part of the battle. It isn’t just about talent. It’s timing and luck too.

  • GMT

    With all the hubbub of our possibilities for next season, I forgot about Nichols (shame on me). I’m glad you wrote this piece about him. He’s a true professional, and I hope we’ll be able to land him a spot.

  • Chris K.

    This has already been talked about at length in other sections, but SI is running a nice piece about the role of point guards on championship teams.
    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/scott_howard-cooper/06/18/point.guards/index.html?eref=sihpT1
    It focuses on the fact that most point guards have a relatively minor role on championship teams (in comparison with the great big guy and/or great wing player that championship teams have).

    I would love to see a more thorough analysis of the numbers… when is the last time that a “point guard” type of player (someone, say, about Tony Parker’s size) took the most shots on a championship team?

    The only ones I can come up with (in recent history) are Isiah Thomas in 1990 and Dwayne Wade in 2006.

    (Rip Hamilton was the leading scorer for the Pistons when they won the title in 2004 and Sheed Wallace took as many shots as Billups did.)

  • Chris K.

    Can we all agree that if your point guard is your leading scorer chances are you’re not winning the title?

    I think that’s a solid starting premise for discussing the future of the Spurs.

  • BlaseE

    Wasn’t this argument in another post’s comments?

    Anyways, highlights from those comments were that:
    1. Hand checking rules have changed the game
    2. The sample sizes are too small
    3. Shaq and Duncan have dominated the data set, but that doesn’t mean a big man can carry you to a title.
    4. Odds are a team’s point guard is not as good as TP so as a general statement : “If your point guard is your leading scorer chances are you’re not winning the title” may be true, but I do not think it applies to the Spurs. Chris Paul, Deron Williams, or Tony Parker could lead a team in scoring and win the title. I’d maybe even throw Rajon Rondo in there at this point. Derrick Rose could be there in time.
    5. I believe Graydon argued that your primary scorer and distributor could be the same person. This is the case for I think just over half the teams in the league, so why is it a bad thing if your point guard is your leader in assists and points versus your 2 or 3 being that person? Its not like Steve Nash and Jason Kidd are collecting rings by not being the leading scorers on their team but distributing. Steve Nash, in a traditional PG role of leading the team in assists and being 4th in scoring, didn’t even make the playoffs.

    I think these generalizations about what kind of team you need to win a title are oversimplified. I think the leading scorer is more or less irrelevant. It is about having 7-9 guys behind him that can contribute in the minutes they are given and fill out the positions. It is about creating match-up problems, coaching, team effort on both ends, etc far more than what position a leading scorer plays.

  • Chris K.

    I agree with you about winning being significantly influenced by team effort, creating match-up problems, team depth, etc

    I think that if the point guard is the leading scorer too that is often a symptom of a weak supporting cast, as was true for the Spurs this year.

    So, you’re right, hand check rules have changed the game, the sample size is small, but if your point guard is your leading scorer that probably means you’re not getting great team ball movement or great team offense, so therefore, using your recipe, you do not get a championship.

    Championships are won by great teams with great depth, but their leading scorers are (except for Isiah and D. Wade) big men or wing players. That’s a fact.

  • BlaseE

    Chris K,

    I think you are thinking in too many absolutes. You can’t say:

    “Championships are won by great teams with great depth, but their leading scorers are (except for Isiah and D. Wade) big men or wing players. That’s a fact.”

    How is it a fact if you include exceptions? I do see your point more clearly now though about it being a symptom of team depth. Obviously, height is a huge factor in the NBA so maybe its easier to find a dominant big man or wing than a dominant PG. So a generalization could be made: If your best player is your PG, it is likely your other starters aren’t that good because PG’s are generally weak.

    However, there are clearly players that transcend that and team structures that make that irrelevant.

    I’m not sure having your PG lead in scoring indicates your team has bad ball movement. Teams need players who can create their own shot and in turn create good looks for their team. If your point guard can do these things, that shouldn’t mean the rest of the team has bad ball movement. I’ll have to think on this one, but it doesn’t seem right.

  • Chris K.

    I’m just saying that although “there are clearly players… and team structures” that “transcend” the general rule that you can’t win a championship with your point guard as your leading scorer - there have only been 3 champions in the past 33 who have succeeded in that manner. (I stopped checking after 33 years, if you’re wondering about the number….also, arguably, 2006 and Wade doesn’t fit, which means only one team and one player has done it, Isiah Thomas and the Pistons.)

    I don’t know why you and so many others are willing to bet on a system that has rarely worked anywhere and has never worked in San Antonio.

    I’m not proposing anything particular about the future direction of the team here, I’m just generally pessimistic if things continue down the “Tony is the Franchise” path.

  • Rye

    I like everything I read about Nichols character and work ethic wise, but he’s a bit undersized for the three spot, his three point shooting statistics in the French League aren’t great for a supposed sharp shooter, and he doesn’t seem that athletic.

    We keep hearing about Danny Green, Malik Hairston, etc. filling the Bowen role, but the reality is all of these guys are 6’6” 210-220, which means not one gives the Spurs the requisite size and athleticism at the three that they desperately need. Plus, willing to defend and actually being highly effective in that area are two different things; case in point Mason.

    I got no problem with Nichols battling Hairston, Williams, and any potential draft picks as a depth wing player, but none of these guys is the answer. The Spurs either need to trade for a Jefferson, Prince, etc. or a Batum type.

  • BlaseE

    Rye,

    I’m going to assume you don’t want to trade Parker or Manu to get a wing player.

    If we want a Jefferson (14.2 million next year) or Prince (10.3 million next year), then our big 4 will cost us 59.7 million or 55.8 million next year, respectively. Lets say the cap is around 70. That leaves us somewhere between 10.3-14.2 million for 11 roster spots (~1.1 per player). Batum is good though because he is locked in at about 1.1 million for the next 2 seasons then goes to 2.2 the year after. I’m not sure the Spurs can afford anyone over about $6 million without losing one of the big 3 depending on how the FO decides to use the MLE. Most of our current veteran role players (Mason, Bonner, KT, Oberto, Finley, and Bowen) are making 3-4 million. This is another reason why I think the Spurs will move into the first round of the draft. We need to lock another good player into a rookie salary scale like Hill is.

    Another way of thinking about it is that our big 3 will make 3.5 million more this year. That is like adding another role player’s salary. Duncan and Manu should also see reduced minutes. Essentially, we are paying more for less. So Bourousis, Herrmann, Batum, and a rookie playing 60-80 mpg combined for ~8.1 million is much better than Prince playing 30 minutes a game for 10.3 even if he is the far better player than any of the 4. The names of the 4 have hundreds of alternatives and combinations as well. I just picked some random ones that are popular at the moment on PTR.

    Any major additions to the roster in the 8-15 million dollar range would almost guarantee bad negotiations with Manu after the season. We can’t expect him to keep sacrificing millions just to play for us.

    http://www.shamsports.com/content/pages/data/salaries/index.jsp

    Chris K,

    I think my argument for the Spurs’ sake is that TP can be the leading scorer and not have to be the franchise in the same way that he led us against the Cavs in 2007. I still think TD should have gotten that MVP because he is the franchise, but Parker led in scoring.

    Only one team can win the title so I’d be more interested in seeing the top 4 teams over those 33 years. I don’t think a clear cut team dominates a season from beginning to end too often.

  • este

    I don’t think it’s that important whether or not Parker is the leading scorer. If Parker averages 22.3 and Duncan avg. 20.4 and Ginobili averages 19.2 then you have balance across the big 3 that’s more important. Now if Parker is avg. 28 and Duncan and Ginobili are averaging 13 and 9 now that’s a problem.

  • ThatBigGuy

    Didn’t Tony average more points in the 2007 Finals? Even if he didn’t average more, he still got the Finals MVP, which would mean he’s another exception to the “scoring point guard = no title” discussion. Este makes a great point.

    On the other hand, there are 4 other players on the floor, so there is an 80% chance the scoring leader is not the point guard. This is beside the fact that point guards don’t usually score much as a function of their position, much like centers never lead their teams in assists.

  • DocLio

    Hi,

    I’m french and a bug fan of Nichols. He played in my favorite team and know him pretty well I think. First of hall, do not pay attention to its 3pt shooting percentage this year ’cause he had all the shot tickets with most of the time a player on him. In NBA, there’s more space (the floor is larger) and if he can get open shots, that’s in, for sure. His shot is pure and he’s a really hard worker. With a coach like Pop who can push it to play stronger and to get some free throws, he can be a very good player in a roster.

    Wish to get some news of him as soon as possible and wish him the best for next year.

    We’ll miss you Austin …

  • http://www.hostboard.com/forums/humboldt-state-basketball-message-board/ Jacks fan

    I watched Austin for 3 years in college at Humboldt State. It makes me proud when a player from tiny Division 2 Humboldt State in Upstate Cali not only gets this close to making an NBA roster, but does it with class, professionalism, and humility.

    That’s Humboldt! Thanks for your time here, Austin!

  • hermosisima

    hi this is hermosisima from the phils.i’m an avid fan of the san antonio spurs and since then watched them closely.this article came about to me a few months ago and happily excited about spurs offseason moves.intrigued to be exact,does anyone know austin’s whereabouts?i don’t see him in any summer league team whatsoever.did he get at least,an invite to a team?remains a mystery.hope someone updates this.i rest my case as a spurs fan.GO SPURS!