Dallas Mavericks 112, San Antonio Spurs 103

by

Rivalry games are tough to recap, especially after a tough loss like last night. It’s difficult to sit and gather your thoughts when the only thing running through your mind is how frustrating it is to hear the chants of the opposing team’s fans as they seemingly filled up nearly a third of the home court arena.

If the intensity of the rivalry is enough to skew my basketball analysis, it also was enough to push the Spurs out of character. It was an early night for Gregg Popovich, who was tossed in the first half by a (who else) Joey Crawford-led officiating crew that made several questionable calls —prompting a rare, antagonistic chant from an entire arena (well, two-thirds of an arena).

Without Popovich there to manage minutes the Spurs core players played well past their season averages (could we see a night off for a player or two Sunday?). And if anyone questioned how important the game was to the Spurs, they need only look at the decision to start Manu Ginobili in the third quarter.

“They are our archrival, everyone wants to own Texas,” George Hill said after the loss. “It’s always going to be like that. Dallas is a great team and you have to get them respect. They came out fighting and they happened to come out on top this time.”

There will be time to look through the game film later, but from my initial reaction—gathered from the upper deck without the benefits of advanced statistics or replays—the moral of the night’s story might be to let sleeping dogs lie.

Jason Terry is the Mavericks equivalent of Ginobili. He ignites the team and provides a swagger that can carry his entire team, especially when his two-man game with Dirk Nowitzki gets going. Through three quarters Terry had a mundane 10 points, shooting 3-for-9 from the floor. The Spurs had a comfortable lead and all seemed to be well.

Then a 42-point fourth quarter happened.

“Whenever you give up 40 points in a quarter it’s never just one thing,” Richard Jefferson said. “It’s a combination of a lot of things.”

Last night that combination was Nowitzki and Terry. While the newspapers and AP reports will (correctly) point out how Nowitzki shook off a horrible night to score 16 points in the fourth quarter, from the stands it seemed like many of the biggest blows were at the hands of Terry.

Going back to the third quarter, Terry was having a mediocre night and seemed content to simply go through the paces. Then with the Spurs surging, backup point guard George Hill and Terry got into an altercation, earning double technicals. From that point on Terry was zeroed in and on top of his game, not missing a shot on his way to 11 points and four assists in the deciding quarter.

Without looking through the tape, or having insight as to what pick and roll coverages the Spurs were using, it appeared that our point guards were allowing themselves to get taken out by the screen far too easily, forcing Tim Duncan in isolation situations with Terry. Now these moments certainly did not account for all 42 of the Mavericks fourth quarter points, but they did seem to go a long way in providing their momentum.

If our schemes were designed to switch, I have to believe that the Spurs would be better served bringing help earlier to force the ball out of Terry’s hands.

“We had our opportunities, being up 10, up 13,14 points like we were,” Jefferson said. “We need to take pride in our defense. I don’t think I did a very good job defensively in the second half and in the fourth quarter made some errors that you just have to learn from.”

While the defense could have been better, as Pop stated, “Dirk’s a hall of fame basketball player and he showed why.” We should expect him to get his numbers. But the longer we use small lineups with Jefferson as the big forward the more I am disturbed by our inability to create mismatches against opposing teams’ power forwards on the offensive end.

For all the talk about how Jefferson has not meshed with Parker, or our starting unit, at some point you have to be able to just grab the ball and go, right? Nowitzki is going to create mismatches on offense. Always. But as much as he has improved on the defensive end over the years Nowitzki should not be able to guard quality wings. Or a forward or center for that matter. Wouldn’t our best defense be to attack his?

I have trouble believing that given the ball 18-20 feet from the basket, Jefferson can’t simply just drive past Nowitzki. Or that a couple of pick and rolls between Jefferson and Duncan wouldn’t force the Mavericks to go small to match up, exposing Nowitzki’s defense to Duncan.

  • VP of Common Sense

    Hats off to the Mavs. They caught fire, big time, shooting 16 of 22 from the field in the fourth.

    If Eric Dampier is hitting 3’s, you know it’s not your night.

  • bahiablanca

    in my opinion, RJ’s defence of Nowitzki was not too bad.

    First three quarters: 0/4 against him and in the last period, Nowitzki made 4/5 irreal shots.

  • sj_papi

    Mediocre effort… are we just going to be a mediocre team this year? I took a glance at the remaining schedule and it’s enough to make me quiver in my little space boots.

  • Jordan

    The p&r defense has been horrid all year because the guards get stuck. Hopefully we figure it out.

  • NL

    on a brighter note, RJ’s block on Jason Terry was siiiick.

  • SpurredOn

    I’m angrier about last night than any game this season. And, having nothing to do with yesterday’s post, I put last night’s 4th quarter problems on Parker. The poor decisions on offense fed the Mavs on the other end. Dallas is a front-running downhill team that rides momentum, thus it was a game of runs. Tony did not lead the offense well in the 4th and never took a good shot. His defense also was less than good. The lead evaporated so quickly because the offensive possessions became scattered, undisciplined which should not happen with a vet point guard whose team still had the lead. FOr those quick to question Pop let last night stand as an example of how his decision making and authority was missed.

    This game swung (other than the officiating) at the end of the 3rd. Up 13 we miss a FT, then give up a putback on a missed Kidd FT. TP then brings the ball up the floor and takes an awful jump-shot when there was time to go to the rim, pass to someone else or let Manu make the final decision. What should’ve been a 12 -14 point lead was only ten, which makes a psychological difference. I also think had Pop been on the bench he would have taken TP our for HIll for defensive purposes and because Hill’s offense in the 2nd half was better.

    Awful all around in the 4th quarter. And that’s without asking an obvious question: just for the sake of professionalism and avoiding an accusation of gamesmanship, why is Crawford allowed to ever officiate and Spurs-Mavs game?

  • Sauce

    I totally agree with your last point that the only way to combat the Dirk’s offense is by attacking him on the other end.

  • motallica

    I give the Mavs credit (the whole organization, even the hated Cuban) and they did earn this win but there are a lot of positives for us to take from this
    (can’t write them now, I have a flight to catch) and overall I honestly still think we are the better team… they just played better this game

    (btw SA trademark is learning and experimenting throughout the season… it’s taking longer this season but it should AND come-on to lose a close game that we easily could have won to arguably one of the top 3 teams in the league is not something to hang your head about…)

    BUT
    Jet is not like Manu.
    Jason Terry is a punk and I really hope he never wins a ring (something I do not wish on Dirk).
    You were in the stands so you didn’t see his blatant and intentional dirty trip on Hill.
    Same like when he punched Finley (his ex-teammate?) in the groin on national television during the playoffs a few years ago??!?!

    Let me say that again… he PUNCHED a player, INTENTIONALLY, in THE GROIN…
    I mean.. really?

    and who did he punch? a known saint in Finley, an ex-teammate and one of the ex-pillars of his franchise, who isn’t rude or obnoxious or big-headed or even pesky or annoying on defense (if you can call what he does defense 😉 hahah )…

    I would almost maybe possibly respect Jason’s game if he wasn’t such an obnoxious punk.

    The NBA would do good to control antics like his as they try to clean up their image.

    I mean what if Hill had twisted or broken his ankle on that play?
    I think the NBA should issue something (suspension, warning, wrist slap, anything) against Terry and I’m not saying that as a sore loser.

    I respect the Mavs and they won the game.
    I love our rivalry.
    I really do wish Dirk wins a ring because he plays (and obviously practices) hard and cleanly.
    (hopefully he’ll win it in a year gino, duncan and parker all get injured, which simultaneously lets them rest, and gets us the 1st pick in the draft, as well as letting all our other players mature and improve including a miraculously stunning amazing season from Ian ;)….. )

    I just think Jet is such a punk, over so many different incidences…
    I understand Manu can be annoying and heartbreaking to opposing teams and I may hate him as much as I love him now if he was playing against us, but I would always respect him.
    I have no respect for Jason Terry at all.

    (oh and also regarding him lighting us up in the 4th, whatever, typical JET, he’ll do that a few quarters of the year… but consistently/when it matters? (playoffs/wcf/finals)…. somehow I think not… although it could be my rage/hate/disgust colored lenses…)

    all the best from egypt!

  • Ant Gomez

    Yep! up ten points going into the 4th, with a struggling Dirk and Terry, you have to like the Spurs chances of closing out the game! What a turn of events, 42 in the fourth quarter, any quarter for that matter is bad, but in the 4th, where teams are suppose to play there hardest to either jump back in the game or close it out, is just not acceptable!! A complete breakdown by the Spurs! This is where they miss Bowen, because Bowen would be causing some type of annoyance to the opposition whether they are up or down in the game!!! I think they miss his veteran leadership!!! All in all, Joey effn Crawford, for what its worth, i dont like this guy at all! ah well, got to live with it.

  • soto1ncrtol

    time to make a trade for a defensive stopper we dont have that on this team kieth bogans is ok but we dont have someone who can consistanly stop someone

  • Hobson13

    I would normally come in here and rant about trading someone, but at this point in the season that may do more harm than good. Besides, we have enough talent (maybe not size though) to compete with anyone in the league. How do we give up 42 points in the fourth when we gave up only 70 for the first three quarters? Just when you think this team turns the corner, they come out and repeat this seasons theme: beat up on the loser teams and find every way in the world to lose to good ones.

    At this point, I think the Spurs problems are more mental than anything else. Although they’ve lost virtually every game to good teams, they’ve been super close or even lead throughout many of those games. I think losing all the veterans we traded (although it needed to be done) really hurt the mental toughness and confidence of this team. They just don’t know how to shut the door on good teams. I think it would do unbelievable wonders for this team to beat the Lakers. We really need to go all in and act like its game 7 of the WCF on Tuesday because I’m not sure how many more of these losses the teams mental state can handle.

  • Dr. Love

    (1) The refs did not lose this game. The Spurs did that just fine on their own without much help.

    (2) RJ’s block on Jason Terry was an uncalled foul (see above).

    (3) Popovich lost his shit and acted the fool. There’s no good angle — ever — in antagonizing the refs, no matter how many bad calls they make. He looked like Bobby Knight throwing a tantrum out there. I am berry, berry deesabointed wif Senor PaPohvech.

  • soto1ncrtol

    i think another problem is that pop refuses to play some of the younger talent is marcus haislip ever going to get any playing time? instead pop wants to roll out with the old bones instead of giving some of the young guys a chance that is going cost us we may not even make it to the playoffs at this rate i would love to see malik hariston and marcus haislip get more of a chance to play instead of garbage time

  • agutierrez

    Part of the problem (and only part) is that we have no good bigs after TD. Dyce has been a monumental disappointment. He’s had one or two good games. He’s no better than Kurt Thomas was for us. Blair is too green, inconsistent and foul prone (but so is Dyce). Theo is (apparently) too old and has no offense. Matt is hurt and sucks on defense. And Pop won’t use Haislip. So Pop plays small-ball and we get killed on the boards.

  • http://www.InvestInSanAntonio.com Wagz

    I agree with what somebody said above, just when we start to seem like we’re pulling it together, we lose our sh!t. I’ve been a believer all season, I’m starting to get concerned. And Crawford is a joke, i can’t stand that guy…..keep him in the NBA if you must, Stern, but don’t let him ref a Spurs game. There were several bogus calls, and although the younger ref was the one making them, I certainly believe Joey had something to do with it.

  • junierizzle

    The Spurs should have won that game. We know that.
    I still think they would have won if POP hadn’t got thrown out. The game was mismanaged . They messed up by starting Manu in the third. Just stick the game plan. The Spurs never called a time out and let the MAVS get into a rhythm. They didn’t call at time-out until the Mavs tied it. Im sure POP would’ve called a time-out when They cut it to 12.
    They lossed the game when the MAVS hit 3 wide-open 3’s in a row to take the lead. Obviously the game plan was to not double and for whatever reason the SPURS let them get 3 wide open shots. Im sure POP wouldve called a time-out after the first 3. After that it was pretty much over.
    Now, since POP was thrown out, the reason they lossed was their Defense. The Spurs have been doing this all season, they get up by ten and stop playing D. But the MAVS arent the Bobcats. They aren’t going to help you out with bad shots and Turnovers. That’s why they can’t beat the “good teams” The “good teams” aren’t going to stop playing if they are down by ten.
    Also, the Spurs really need a BIG man. How many times have they played good D and force the other team into a bad shot, only to be tipped in by a Big man? They need a big body to pick up the bricks. That’s why the Mavs never lossed confidence. They got so many put backs.
    If they make a deal, I hope they get a BIg man. ANy Big body just to take up space.

  • Nomo Stew

    How does Joey Crawford still have a job? Regardless of what the Spurs did to lose this game, it makes no sense that a professional sports league would retain a referee who has such a clear, obvious bias against one team and has clearly shown that he will act on that bias at every opportunity.

  • Mr. Anonymous

    This team’s problem are more mental then problems with chemistry or ability or whatever other BS we’ve all been spouting.

    And that’s a huge problem.

    It doesn’t matter how good you are - if you mentally aren’t there you’re fucked.

    And can someone tell me what the hell is wrong with Tony? How do you go from a one-man wrecking ball, that could single-handedly torch the Mavs on his on - even if Manu isn’t there and TD is injured, to… this.

    Everyone except for Tim is so bloody useless right now.

  • Miggy

    If I had the time I’d like to see the stats on how Jefferson and McDyess faired against Western Conference teams coming in to the Spurs organization. It appears to me that when they play Western Conference opposition they seem lost. I know they are very successful players, but coming from the Eastern Conference to me doesn’t say much. It’s almost like coming from the JV team and playing varsity. The Eastern Conference just hasn’t impressed me over the last decade. I’m not one to doubt Pop and RC’s success when it comes to building a team, but I wonder if when making a trade or going after new talent that this concept comes to mind (The Eastern Conference is just not that good). It just may be that I am trying to make excuses for the losses against winning teams. Of all the losses the Spurs have had this season only 3 have come againts Eastern Conference Teams. Bulls, Celtics and Raptors.

  • not as good as I once was

    Im no basketball wizard. but I have played sports and coached, all my life. this is what I see. You can’t change your personal like the spurs have and expect a team to gel right away. most teams couldn’t do it in a year. You say well the spurs have done it every year,yes thats true but they always kept thier core players. Duncan, Parker, Manu, and Bowen. Without Bowen you don’t win the championships the Spurs have won. Your also missing that big man to compliment Duncan. does that mean the Spurs are doomed this year? Maybe and maybe not. look I’ve seen it all my life teams with alot of talent struggling. what happens when a good team hasen’t geled yet.thier up and down at times they look unbeatable and then in a flash they look like they couldn’t beat me, and I’m crippled. This is what I know for sure. they have a good coaching staff, they have alot of class and alot of talent and if they do start geling watch out they will be unbeatable. look at the way they looked against the mavs for a good part of the game.

  • Cory Clay

    The Maverick loss just underlines what we all already know, the Spurs still don’t have a defender for the active PF’s like Dirk, Gasol, Rashard Lewis, etc.
    I’ve mentioned a possible trade for Shane Battier and here are a couple more possible targets:

    The first scenario I’ll admit is a little far fetched but if the Bulls do decide to go all in on this summer’s free agent chase the more cap space for them the better. Our expiring contracts of Mason, Finley, and Bonner for Luol Deng works financially through ESPN’s Trade Machine.

    Another, more plausible option, would be the Spurs sending Mason, Finley and Haislip to New York for Jarred Jeffried and either Jordan Hill or Wilson Chandler, plus cash.
    This gives the Spurs a long defender and a young player with potential. The Knicks get more cap space to be able to possibly team Lebron with a 2nd big time free agent.

  • SpursfanSteve

    The Rockets are going to move Battier. He’s part of their core. He is the leader on that team, even if his stats dont always indicate it.

    I wouldnt want Deng. I think he is pretty overrated, and he would just duplicate what RJ does. If we’re going to targert a Bull, i’d rather have Tyrus Thomas or Hinrich. But i dont think Thomas is a good fit (although prior to his injury he had shown A LOT of improvement in his jumper and focus). Hinrich can lock down 3 different positions and shoot the three pretty accurately. But i dont think its worth it.

    I say give them time. Against the upper level competition, we’ve beat ourselves as much as they’ve beaten us. And we’ve still been right in the game at the end. I think we are overreacting thinking we need a trade. If the good teams were blowing us out, i would agree- but they arent. To me, that doesnt show a need for anything but more discipline.

  • Cory Clay

    I love when people make posts as if they have inside knowledge of the thoughts of an NBA team’s front office.

    It’s actually been heavily rumored that the Rocket front office gave the writer, who wrote the big article about Battier’s contribution beyond statistics, extra access to inflate his trade value.

    And I would much rather see Luol Deng as a small ball 4 so then Jefferson could be used as a 3 with Parker and Manu in the backcourt. Therefore I dont agree that Deng duplicates what Jefferson already brings, especially since Deng would be a much more effective defender against the players that I mentioned. If we have Richard Jefferson guarding Pau Gasol than the Spurs will be in big trouble.

    And I dont know if you’ve been paying attention to many Bulls games but Hinrich is having a horrible shooting season, even worse than last year which also wasn’t a good shooting year. So thanks but no thanks on Kirk.

  • Hicksy

    SPURS have the pieces we just don’t seem to be able to get them to work together proparly just yet. As has been said before are we going to see some of this ‘YOUNG’ talent we’ve brought in this summer? Hairston should know the system well and since we seem to come up short with these jump shooting 4’s why aren’t we seeing Haslip??
    Or ‘gasp even Mahinmi ?? Any idea’s??

  • Cory Clay

    @Hicksy you are getting your wish right now, I’m at the Spurs vs Nets and Manihimi is actually on the court! And playing well!!

  • Cory Clay

    Other than the fouls of course!!!

  • Dave

    I am not a spurs fan, so I can speak without black and silver in my judgement. The spurs inability to beat over 500 teams is a serious problem. The game against the Lakers is the Spurs make or break game. I think if they can beat the lakers, this is the type of game that could help their confidence going forward. Spurs have lost so far to all of their main division rivals.
    You have to give credit to the spurs for making the moves they made before the season started. They know that TD, has about 1-2 more all star caliber seasons in him. Unfort. this project has not worked well for the spurs, they are not a champioship caliber defensive team, can’t beat above average teams. Manu is not the same player during the championships, they don’t have enough size to contend with the playoff teams. But spurs fans can take pride in knowing that the spurs are a great organization, who have had a great decade.