Saturday, April 18th, 2009...6:03 am
Double the Dribble; Or, Learning Defense from Don Nelson
In a recent comment thread, NickyDubs asked, “So I don’t recall what we tried earlier in the season, but who do you think we’ll send at Dirk?”
The short answer is Matt Bonner and Ime Udoka, but that doesn’t say much. The Spurs have some personnel problems, one of which has been there since preseason. That is, they don’t really have a big who can guard face up bigs like David West and Dirk Nowitzki. So, in that sense, the Spurs will have to live with containing the German rather than stopping him. But who can really stop Dirk Nowitzki? Still, the unfortunate options of Bonner (mediocre defender, lacks the necessary speed to keep up with dribbling Dirk) and Udoka (good defender, but forced to guard a taller player out of position) is problematic. What about Bruce Bowen? This is merely conjecture, but I suspect Popovich will use him in spot duty to slow Jason Terry and occasionally double up on Dirk.
The Spurs have not played the Mavericks in the playoffs since the Warriors defeated them in 2007. In that series, Don Nelson brilliantly sent a small pest at Dirk’s dribble every time he put the ball on the floor-as soon as the ball touched hardwood the Warriors swarmed Nowitzki. This resulted in some turnovers, but more than anything it effectively disturbed Nowitzki’s rhythm. Dallas, of course, lost the series. I’m not sure Popovich is planning the same attack, but I hope so. Between Bruce Bowen, Tony Parker and, hopefully, George Hill, the Spurs have the sort of double team personnel that could make this a successful strategy.
Allow me a quick rabbit trail on George Hill. Pop has said that Hill will not be playing much this postseason. Disappointing, but not surprising. But Popovich made these statements prior to drawing the Mavericks. George Hill’s defense is a great option against Dallas not only because of his ability to hurt Nowitzki on the double team, but because the Mavericks have numerous penetraters that trouble the Spurs. George Hill could harass J.J. Barea or Jason Terry into difficult shots, limiting their damage. As much as we wonder about how the Spurs will guard Dirk Nowitzki, I’m more concerned about their ability to prevent Dallas’ guards from penetrating. This, to my mind, is the key to the series.
But returning to the question of guarding Nowitzki, there is one more option at the Spurs disposal: attack him on offense. The last time these two teams played one another in the postseason, the Spurs were more limited in terms of frontcourt scoring options. In this series, Hasselhoff can’t vacation while guarding Nazr Mohammed or Rasho Nesterovic. The Spurs should run their offense at Dirk Nowitzki whenever he draws Tim Duncan or Drew Gooden; they should make him work to close out on Kurt Thomas’ pick and pops and Matt Bonner’s three ball. These are not the same teams that played in 2006, and I think the Spurs can exploit the Mavericks in ways they could not back then. Hopefully the series has the same feel and drama, but the Xs and Os could be much different.

5 Comments
April 18th, 2009 at 7:39 am
[...] the Ginobili injury-I expect Popovich to stick with a standard fare 5-man unit. As I mentioned in another post, the Spurs best defense of Dirk Nowitzki is forcing him to defend. Because of this, Pop would be [...]
April 18th, 2009 at 9:08 am
The idea of doubling Dirk on the dribble is a sound one, but actually a bit dated. After the implosion against the Warriors, Dirk’s work that summer rightfully centered on preventing that type of defense from working so well ever again. It might scare him away from a few shots, but Dirk’s much improved at passing out of those doubles.
But attacking him on offense has always been a pretty decent strat. Not just because of having to work both ways, but also because of the fouls.
April 18th, 2009 at 11:20 am
That Warriors team showed that it was better to have someone who could stay in front of Dirk and pester him thus making him a jump shooter but away from the rim and FTs. That has to be a smaller guy whose physicality won’t get the sympathy of the refs but who also is committed to defending. In 2007 for G.S. that was Jackson & Barnes. For us in this series, that has to be Bowen & Udoka.
That said, Dirk could avg 30 and the Mavs still lose in 5-6 games if Terry and Howard don’t both avg 20+ points. So the larger issue is shutting one of those guys down and containing the other. That should be where Hill has a role. Breaking down the defense would allow the Mavs to live at the FT line as well as give confidence to what is essentially a team of jump shooters. Also, stopping the Mavs from getting open 3s on the fast-break. Dirk, Terry, Bareja & even Kidd must be found. Those extra points add up in a series that historically comes down to no more than two possessions.
April 18th, 2009 at 12:10 pm
Hill, the poor kid. If he sees any significant playing time this series, he’s got to be so confused. First he’s playing, then he’s not, then he is, then he’s not, and now he might be again. Geez.
April 18th, 2009 at 1:28 pm
[...] Dirk evolved beyond the point of being stalled by double teams on the bounce? I’d like to think so, but I wouldn’t mind if we never had to find out. And, on [...]
Leave a Reply