Editorial Odds and Ends

by

Yesterday we began a discussion about the ways the media has changed since 2008 when 48 Minutes of Hell was founded and how we intend to respond to those changes. I ended with a rallying cry: “never settle down” — a reference to the pitfall critic and novelist Renata Adler believes journalists are most likely to stumble into. I said there are going to be a lot of changes, but beyond mentioning that we were going to move away from traditional game recaps, I didn’t provide much detail. I wanted to take the opportunity, before the Spurs’ season begins in Oklahoma City this evening, to give some further examples of what “never settling down” means to us.

We’re going to publish less frequently. That doesn’t mean we are going to be working less hard. But we’re going to be challenging one another to explore complex topics, and to do so with real depth. Our goal is to publish pieces that have lasting value (as opposed to, say, game recaps, the value of which expires in a matter of days if not hours). We will always prioritize quality and thoughtfulness over speed and frequency.

Our approach to covering the team will be a bit different from much of contemporary sportswriting. Every piece will begin (at least implicitly) with a question. Our goal will be to explore ideas, not win arguments. My dream is that every topic we publish on would be examined with such thoroughness and transparency that a reader could both respect our conclusion and yet come to a completely separate conclusion of his or her own. In reality, that’s very challenging to achieve, but that’s no reason not to strive for it. If you feel we are failing to live up to that standard, please call us out.

Over time original research and reporting will play an increasingly bigger role in our work. And in the spirit of transparency I just mentioned, we’ll share as much source material as possible with our readers. We want you to know the full context behind the stories we tell. Despite that commitment to original reporting, we have not requested a Spurs media credential for this upcoming season. Because of the changing nature of access at the AT&T Center, we felt it would be best to do our reporting elsewhere.

Does that mean we’re not going to be sharing our thoughts on Spurs games? No, of course not. We’ll be sharing thoughts on most every game, but we’ll be doing so in formats that are at times unfamiliar. And we’re going to push one another to provide real insights. Comments like “Kawhi Leonard is off to a great start this season” don’t help any of us think more critically about the organization’s personnel, processes or culture. We’re not going to be needlessly contrarian either. We’re just going to work hard to ensure that the ideas we offer were worth your time.

And of course we’ll also be sharing thoughts on social before, during and after games. If you don’t follow 48 Minutes of Hell on Twitter, you should. We’re going to have a lot of fun this season although, yes, things may get weird from time to time.

Speaking of fun: Oftentimes terms like “thoughtful” are code for self-serious and self-indulgent. That is not our intention. We take our jobs as critics of the game seriously, but let’s not forget that it is exactly that: a game. If we’re not having fun writing and you’re not having fun reading, what is the point of any of this.

There’s lots of other awesome stuff on the horizon: A new website, a revamped podcast, and a newsletter that you definitely should subscribe to. But more than anything there is a renewed commitment to doing work that is worth your time.

Tip-off is in a few hours. We’ll be watching. I hope you’ll join us.

  • the drwolff

    Twitter wisdom…shepherds lead. SHEEP follow. This site was excellent and it has a following.
    The moment this site becomes entertainment before basketball…pack it up and sell it to the lakers. This IS the Spurs site after all…yes? We care about Basketball and not lebron and CP3 on a banana boat. I love Kawhi by the way….he…exposes. He made Durant look VERY weak tonight on both ends. The Block/steal…expert.
    Rondo used to be the player I hated most for the ridiculous overhype. We all know how analytics lit that myth up to the demise of many an idiot media members overhype. Dwight Howard will go down next…my prediction. Blocks that DON’T result in a possession followed by Blocks that STILL result in the opponents scoring. I bet howard leads the league every year he has played. Nice volleyball swat out of bounds dwight…think you couldve gained possesion on that? IT might actually help win games…oh yeah…I forgot. You arent about winning…you are about the show and the money. How did the off season free throw shooting coach do this season compared to the last 10 dwight? Oh yeah…that’s right…you NEVER practice them. Prediction…when Dwights athleticism leaves him around 33YO…his game will fall off a cliff and he’ll be out by 36. Parker looks REALLY, REALLY bad. His defense has always been VERY weak due to his size…except we overlooked that for his18pts a game and leading the league in points in the paint…it’s the elephant in the room now that he eeks out 6-10 pts a game. When we lose…that’s where the bleed is going to come from. OKC goes to a waiters post up? in crunch time? TWICE??? AND HE CONVERTS BOTH??????????? That was hard to watch. It’s painful seeing Tony now vs 2 years ago… We looked good as a team. We’ll do fine. No real schedule stretch for 25 games or so…21-4 by game 25. Aldridge letting that green miss go right through his hands? What the hell was that?

  • Pingback: Kawhi Leonard: The Modern Prometheus()

  • Johnathan Bailey

    I applaud you guys for trying something different, but frankly the reason I started coming here was for insightful breakdown of games and the performances of each player, particularly when I wasn’t able to watch the game for myself. I hope that isn’t disappearing.

  • bclowman

    I’m truly excited for the future of this site. I started coming to this site when I discovered it through the True Hoop Network, and truly felt that when I first started coming, there were lots of those think pieces that Graydon describes. I was a frequent commentor, because I felt that a lot of those article inspired though provoking discussions. I didn’t want to just come to a site and post things like “DeJuan Blair is the best freakin’ player we’ve got!” (anybody remember that guy? I wish I could remember his username.)
    Over time, it seemed the site just morphed into what Graydon describes - game recaps. I still came every day, because you guys are still excellent writers and I appreciate getting different people’s perspective on my favorite team. I was just a little less engaging, I suppose.
    Good luck, fellas! Can’t wait to see what y’all bring this season. Go Spurs Go!

  • Phoolish

    +1

  • ferscia

    Sorry to be critical, but this editorial seems a politically correct good bye.

    “We’re going to publish less frequently.” Even less? You are aware that fans need a constant flow of articles to follow a site and keep it alive, right?

    “Our goal is to publish pieces that have
    lasting value (as opposed to, say, game recaps, the value of which
    expires in a matter of days if not hours).” Are you going to write a scientific treaty about Spurs basketball? 2014 articles were already one of the best about the Spurs. El Contusion was one big reason (if not the best) I came here. Not even Zach Lowe, arguably the best NBA writer, is so pretentious.

    “we have not requested a Spurs media credential for this upcoming season.” What!?

    “Because of the changing nature of access at the AT&T Center, we felt it would be best to do our reporting elsewhere.” If you are going to share your sources, you better start stating the real reason for this move.

    BTW, who are you Graydon Gordian? I´ve never seen you write an article for the last couple of years I´ve been following 48MoH. Ah, you must be that guy that tells others what to do but don´t know what you are doing yourself. Aka, the boss.

    Yes I´m angry.

  • Joyflyer

    I am disappointed that we won’t be getting game recaps. I don’t get to watch many games. On the “Never Settle Down” post, it was said that most of that information is found elsewhere. But it’s not. I like hearing about the progression of Patty Mills or Kyle Anderson or Aaron Baynes (yes, I know he’s not here anymore….) from someone who watches them every game. ESPN.com isn’t going to give me that. This was the only place to find that kind of information. I’m excited for the new content. But I’m certainly going to miss following a team at an intimate level that was provided by 48MoH. Maybe it’s not as complete (and shallow, which isn’t a bad thing) as El Conclusion, but what if you offered a “3 Things about 3 Players” after every game, where we get your take on “I’ve noticed this about Tony lately” and “Ray is really surprising me because of these little things that he has been doing off the ball” and “Danny has gotten a quick bench by Pop in 6 of the last 8 games because…..” These are things that the AP recaps won’t tell us. And I don’t know who has that kind of insight other than guys who follow the Spurs extensively. And I’m interested in them.

    Thanks for all your work. I really do appreciate it. This has become one of my daily (sometimes multiple times/day) website checks. I’m hoping it stays that way.

  • brunostrange

    Good luck on the new direction, Im curious where it leads. If you’ll allow a bit of unsolicited advice, however, it seems to me that publishing “less frequently” is a misstep for a site that is trying to build itself a new identity, and one that - as per another post on the site - is not affiliated with a major media organization like the ESPN TrueHoops Network (i realize that such an affiliation isn’t a goldmine and doesn’t translate into huge traffic numbers, but it does bring some relevancy and eyeballs - that’s how, for instance, I found your site). Though the comparison is inexact, it sounds like you’re looking to veer into a somewhat more Grantland-ish direction, which sounds interesting, but the best way to do so is by putting out content on a frequent and consistent basis that hammers that idea into your audience. Otherwise you run the risk of turning into a stagnant site that reeks of vanity project, which is clearly not your intent. In any case, good luck…and maybe reconsider your decision to kill El Conclusion.

  • brunostrange

    I assume you know poundingtherock.com? Pretty insightful Spurs coverage.

  • Comrade747

    100 % With this post

    Who are you again?

    El Conclusion is my #1 reason why I went to this site. Plus it introduced me to Caleb’s funny shenanigans.

    Matthew, Trevor, and Caleb bring the good content and seem like the work horses.

  • Graydon Gordian

    Graydon may be real. He may not. He is everyone and no one. Graydon is legion, for he is many.

  • fkj74

    I think you guys are “throwing out the bay with the bath water”. I came to this site for EL Conclusion and enjoy it very much. Wish you guys would bring it back. Go Spurs! ( I enjoy the writing on this site)

  • bclowman

    Haha. Legion. Yes!!!!

  • Dapimp Ofdayear

    Keyzer Soze-ish…

  • Dapimp Ofdayear

    I agree with everyone else. At least keep El Conclusion. And the Margin that Tynan does. The point is, we are trying to make it clear to you guys that it’s not about banal stats and recaps we can get anywhere. It’s your personalities, your intimate knowledge of the Spurs, your writing styles, and the like is what made the site what it is. And THAT is a rare commodity, hardly an unlimited one like you seem to think. You’re being too self-critical. This season, bursting at the seams with juicy storylines, such as:

    Perhaps the final NBA season of Tim Duncan.
    The acquistion of an in-his-prime All-Star like Aldridge, and how he fits.
    The likely swan song of Manu Ginobili.
    The stunning decline of Tony Parker.
    The evolution of Kawhi Leonard into a Top 7 NBA player, and his quest to become the alpha and a first-time All Star.
    The bloodbath that is the top 5 teams in the Western Conference, who BTW the Spurs will have beat at least TWO in the playoffs for another showdown with LeBron and gang,
    Will D West taking an $11 million paycut light a fire under the sometimes complacent Spurs?
    Has Patty Mills beome the best point guard on the Spurs?
    How does Pop integrate all the new pieces?

    And on and on…We want to hear familiar voices covering these things. So how about it?

  • Tyler

    Apparently I’m in the minority here, but I look forward to the new direction for several reason. First, I don’t believe there is much value in game recaps/grades if you have the chance to watch the games. If you don’t watch the games, I can see how the new format might not be welcome news. But again, that’s not me.

    Maybe something that is lost in translation here - to crank out in-depth, provocative pieces requires an immense amount of time researching, editing, interviewing, and re-writing. This isn’t a night-before-your-paper-is-due-in-college-type thing here. It’s not a coincidence the best writers don’t write in-depth pieces every day. There’s simply not enough time to go around to do everything; something has to give.

    Best example I can give is Zach Lowe on espn. IMO, he’s the best NBA-focused writer I’ve ever read (no offense to 48MoH). His stuff is quirky, insightful, yet approachable for any somewhat knowledgeeable NBA fan. I want more of this, and if it takes sacrificing game recaps, so be it. I’m happy with that trade off.

  • Big Jake

    If it ain’t broken don’t fix i . Bad decision by the staff. I won’t be here much based on what I have already seen. You guys were originals. This site was perfect. Especially EL CONCLUSION.