 |
Tim Duncan, C 24 MIN | 7-14 FG | 0-2 FT | 2 REB | 0 AST | 14 PTS | -12Went into the archives and pulled out a driving dunk early and played okay defensively. But the difference between Duncan five years ago and Duncan now is that a front line like this can make him seem ordinary when he’s not receiving enough help. |
 |
 |
Kawhi Leonard, SF 18 MIN | 1-4 FG | 0-0 FT | 5 REB | 1 AST | 2 PTS | -8Kawhi Leonard was practically invisible, but then, so much of his game still relies on Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili being able to collapse a defense. With that in mind, how negatively do you reflect on Leonard when the players he depends on struggle? Defensively, Ron Artest had a flashback to his Pacers days and was simply too overpowering for Leonard at times. |
 |
 |
DeJuan Blair, F 13 MIN | 0-2 FG | 0-0 FT | 4 REB | 2 AST | 0 PTS | -4This is simply a terrible matchup for Blair. To an extent, it’s hard to fault him. His performance on the Lakers will always be a mere barometer for how focused Andrew Bynum is on that particular night. Tonight Bynum was pretty damn dialed in, and it reflects in Blair’s stat line. |
 |
 |
Tony Parker, PG 27 MIN | 2-12 FG | 0-0 FT | 2 REB | 8 AST | 4 PTS | -16The key to beating the Lakers defense is collapsing it, then making their towering front line move side-to-side, scrambling on rotations. For a number of reasons (had a rare off night with his jumper) Parker never really could collapse the defense completely. The eight assists look nice, but they’re inflated stat filler. When these teams meet again, Parker needs to exploit the Lakers as the matchup advantage it’s supposed to be. |
 |
 |
Daniel Green, G 27 MIN | 7-11 FG | 3-3 FT | 3 REB | 2 AST | 22 PTS | -2Started the game brilliantly, and ended on a scoring flurry against the Lakers starters, so it wasn’t completely a case of filling the stat sheet with empty calories. I eagerly await seeing Green get a shot at Kobe Bryant. |
 |
 |
Stephen Jackson, SG 25 MIN | 2-4 FG | 0-0 FT | 5 REB | 2 AST | 6 PTS | -5Wanted to give Jackson a lower grade, but then reasoned on a night the Spurs played better, his contribution would look better. Was tied for the team lead in rebounds with five. |
 |
 |
Matt Bonner, PF 20 MIN | 3-7 FG | 0-0 FT | 1 REB | 1 AST | 9 PTS | -8Should the Spurs meet the Lakers in the playoffs, I can see Bonner starting. Tim Duncan is the only player that can competently defend Andrew Bynum, and while Boris Diaw might be a bit more effective defending Pau Gasol, Bonner can at least make life difficult for the Lakers at the other end. |
 |
 |
Boris Diaw, PF 17 MIN | 0-0 FG | 0-0 FT | 2 REB | 3 AST | 0 PTS | -4While the passing is nice, at some point Diaw has to be a threat to score. Otherwise it’s just watching your 6-8 power forward dribbling into the middle of the lane and making a harmless pass to the wing to reset the offense with less time on the shot clock. To be an effective passer, the defense has to respect you. The Lakers did not. |
 |
 |
Manu Ginobili, SG 26 MIN | 3-8 FG | 2-4 FT | 4 REB | 5 AST | 9 PTS | -13Ginobili’s drives were swallowed alive by the Lakers length, and he had trouble finding rhythm anywhere else to compensate. Like Parker, needs to do a better job collapsing the defense and either going hard to draw fouls or making smarter decisions. |
 |
 |
Tiago Splitter, C 15 MIN | 3-4 FG | 0-0 FT | 2 REB | 0 AST | 6 PTS | -9Was he efficient? I suppose. Was he impactful? Not at all. |
 |
 |
James Anderson, SG 7 MIN | 2-4 FG | 0-0 FT | 1 REB | 0 AST | 5 PTS | +9Had a nice little run with the fourth quarter unity that made the score more respectable than it was. Provided Lakers fans with an opportunity to chant air ball in the AT&T Center. |
 |
 |
Patrick Mills, PG 21 MIN | 3-11 FG | 0-0 FT | 2 REB | 2 AST | 7 PTS | +2“Has never met a shot he couldn’t turn into a fade away.” -Andrew McNeill |
 |