Never Settle Down

by

Serious publications tend from time to time to hire talented people, educated, usually young, devoted to the craft of criticism, at least as it entails fidelity to an art and to a text under review. What usually happens is that such a critic writes for some time at his highest level: reporting and characterizing accurately; incorporating in whatever is judgmental evidence for what he’s saying (a sign of integrity in a critic, as opposed to an opinion monger, is that he tries for evidence; in reviewing prose forms, for example, he will quote); and producing insights, and allusions, which, if they are not downright brilliant, are apposite. What happens after a longer time is that he settles down.

-Renata Adler, “Toward a Radical Middle,” After the Tall Timber

The challenges this generation of journalists faces is unlike any that has come before. I’m not asking for your sympathy as much as attempting to state a fact. There are ethical challenges, sure, but the willingness of the industry to wrestle openly with its own ethics is actually a sign of health, not impending demise. The challenges I’m referring to are largely structural and economic.

No media organization is immune to the effects of these challenges. The economic outlook may be rosier than it was when I founded this publication in 2008, but widespread layoffs in the industry suggest it is a profession that has yet to regain its footing. Even our former partner ESPN, a company that dominates its chosen vertical unlike any other, was recently forced to cut staff so as to briefly steady itself atop the ever-shifting media landscape.

Why is this happening? I guess you could blame Reagan for deregulating the economy, or Al Gore for inventing the Internet, or CNN for inventing the 24-hour news cycle, or Mark Zuckerberg for inventing Facebook, or Steve Jobs and Jonathan Ive for inventing the iPhone or Bi Sheng for inventing movable type. (Johannes Gutenberg did not invent the printing press. He merely introduced it to Europe.)

Personally, I don’t blame anyone in particular. I don’t think individuals are to blame for this sort of thing. But nonetheless the challenges the media face are real, and as members of the media we here at 48 Minutes of Hell must respond. The media has changed a lot over the last seven and a half years. It’s for the best that we change too.

There are lots of challenges that journalists face that are unique to this day and age, but that doesn’t mean the challenges that journalists used to face have subsided. They are still very present, and the greatest of those challenges is the temptation to “settle down.”

What’s rewarding about writing is that it is hard. Most everyone understands this — that it is hard, not that it is rewarding — at least implicitly. Even the most talented writers among us struggle with their craft.

What’s difficult about writing is, well, that it is hard. Most everyone understands this, at least implicitly. This is especially true in journalism, in which you are not just responsible for your own ideas but those of someone else. Over time most writers give in to the temptation to make our very difficult craft easier, if even for just a moment. Over time most of us settle down.

While the temptation to settle down and the challenges posed by the economic and structural transformations the media industry is undergoing do not have the same root cause, I believe the solution to the latter can be found in resistance to the former. I believe that the best way to not merely survive but thrive as a member of the media in 2015 is to not settle down.

Believe it or not, I spend a fair amount of time thinking about our audience. Partly this is because I’m still a little astounded anyone is the least bit interested in reading our writing, but mostly it’s because I don’t believe we will survive if we aren’t providing value to our audience. I’ve always been proud of what we’ve published, but recently I’ve questioned the amount of value we’re providing. This isn’t a question of quality. The matter at hand is scarcity.

If a commodity exists in infinite supply, it is rendered valueless. This is economics 101. Scarcity is what creates value. And content is the least scarce commodity in existence. If our goal at 48 Minutes of Hell is to provide value to our readers, then we face a very particular challenge: We must become alchemists, transforming a valueless commodity into a valuable one.

The best way — the only way — to do this is to refuse to settle down. And that is what we intend to do.

A lot of things are going to change. For instance, we’ll be doing away with things like game recaps. Why? Because you likely watched the game, and even if you didn’t, you can find a recap elsewhere. Our goal is to bring you ideas, information, and stories about the San Antonio Spurs that you can’t readily find elsewhere. Sometimes our ideas will flash by on Twitter. Other times they will be unpackaged over the course of thousands of words. The time it takes us to capture the idea isn’t what matters. What matters is that, when you are finished reading, you should be confident that you donated your time to a group of writers who never settled down.

  • MarkBarton

    Very nicely written piece. I understand you want to go for quality over quantity, and while that’s admirable, people tend to revisit sites often when they know that there’s going to be new content every time they visit. If you’re not going to generate daily content, you’re going to have to find another way to direct traffic to the site. I know you have excellent writers, so I hope you guys figure it out, because I know the articles you produce are going to be great when they appear. And I can’t wait for Caleb’s next video/mashup.

  • MarkBarton

    BTW, Adler is one of my favorite writers, bonus points for putting her quote at the top of the article.

  • Jezav

    “Good, better, best. Never let it rest. Until your good is better and your better is best.”

  • Jezav

    I’ve really enjoyed the writing from 48MoH over the years, and I look forward to what you have in store for the site next. Best of luck!

  • Tyler

    Couldn’t agree more. While I might be in the minority, as a true basketball nerd, I’d rather have your (valuable) time spent on one long form, original piece (weekly or even twice a month). That’s where you can truly dive into the minutia of the game (again, I’m a nerd). Anyone can do game recaps with freaking grades - blah, little to no value there.

    I’d imagine Zach Lowe is the template you’re going for here - long form, highly intelligent analysis every weekish.

    As far as traffic on the site, while viewership might decrease initially, come up with great, original content and the viewers will follow - and they’ll most likely be more valuable from an advertising perspective, but that’s a whole other topic.

    Good luck.

  • Mike Smith

    Times are tough. Even for those that write for a living. My favorite part of this site were the recaps. Sure we watched the game and other places posted about the highlights. But 48 was one of the few places where I as a Spurs fan had a forum to read about season long trends found game after game. These included rundowns of the superstars to the lesser known players whose names would never be mentioned on larger networks. I’m sure hard choices had to be made. I can only hope that what is left over is worth clicking.

  • Gomezd

    Agree completely, I loved 48moh recaps precicely because of the unique insight. The guys were always able to detail how the players performed in the context of the spurs season so far and in the future, something which was quite unique. National media dont mention it and other spurs sites failed to look much beyond that particular game.

  • Stephen

    I agree. Your recaps and grades were things I regularly turned in for, because no one did them like 48MOH. Thank you for them, they will be missed. (Any insights on other sites that give good recaps discussing all the pieces of the spurs will be appreciated.)

  • Dapimp Ofdayear

    Eliminating the “What’s the Story” and “Game Recaps” are eliminating the best thing about this site.

  • Dapimp Ofdayear

    Another thing, sometimes it’s about a particular writer’s style of communication, delivery, quirks, verbal ticks, and insights that draw in and bring back readers. You’re acting as if just because somebody else is delivering similar information that it’s allthe same quality, or consumed in the same way. That’s not the case at all. I can read all about basketball, and I do all over the web, for example, but Zach Lowe’s style of writing, angles, nuance, and insights are simply more enjoyable to me than other writers covering the same topic.

  • James

    Honestly, I come to this website primarily for the recaps. I live in Missouri and frequently cannot see the games (as a poor student I can’t justify paying for league pass). Please reconsider. I know a lot of time/passion/thought has gone into this decision but I will certainly be greatly saddened by the loss of this resource.

  • Tyler

    But your point about Zach Lowe is exactly the reason I believe they are making this change - Lowe’s time is spent on hard hitting, in depth pieces on leaguewide and/or team specific trends, not on game recaps.

    Maybe it’s just a matter of taste - I watch every game, so game recaps don’t have much value to me. I’d rather spend my time reading about the macro, below the radar trends that take place over the course of the season, rather than the micro, game-to-game stuff.

    In an ideal world, I’m sure the writers on 48MofH would love to provide great content after each and every game. But unfortunately, time is the most valuable resource, and allocating it efficiently means some things have to go.

  • Pingback: Editorial Odds and Ends()

  • Ryan McShane

    Does this also mean the staff at 48moh will be reduced?

  • Pingback: Kawhi Leonard: The Modern Prometheus()

  • Phoolish

    Agree completely. Those were the reasons I have had this site bookmarked for years. If they are gone I see myself drifting away. This makes me sad.

  • the drwolff

    You have a unique following…and change the product? Hershey bars are now doughnuts? We’ll still call them hershey bars though? They’ll eat em cause everyone likes doughnuts…true, but we came to this site for hershey bars. Mark Cuban would call that business suicide I would guess the formatting for what’s the story and grading exists. I guess the problem is that “Serious journalists” are the ones doing the site as opposed to someone working a day job and doing this as a hobby. Fans, short for “FANATICS”, would be in their spurs pajamas typing by a Duncan bobble head before climbing into their comfy black and white spurs bedsheets…grey duvet, of course…to discuss their team at length. I actually thought that’s what you guys were doing. This isn’t about winning the pulitzer. It’s about changing the $5 seats to luxury boxes. Rubbing elbows with the elites is more prestigious(lucrative) then having a dog with the bleacher bums. How corporate…how normal…move over corner store…walmart’s coming and it’s product is going to be SOOOO MUCH BETTER (bands playing, dancers, confetti)…who gets screwed…the fans/consumers. I drop in to your site because I love the corner store and HATE/HATE/HATE the slaughterhouse atmosphere at Walmart.
    “The pursuit of money is the demise of all good things”—-me
    In the end it’s your site and you can do whatever you want…just like a fan’s sobering realization they have no connection in reality to any “Team”. We aren’t players, just privileged observers and it’s an AMERICAN franchises right to squeeze the privileged observers for every cent. I don’t agree with the statement of unique challenges to today’s journalist…go see Bob Ryan. How many bus trips would you have went on following a third class sport in a city DOMINATED by baseball and hockey. The spurs, of all teams, are the shining remaining bastion of sport over hype. It’s about basketball and not about what the media/public MAKES of basketball. In essence it’s about the math being mightier then the pen. This age of anointment and who can lipstick the pig to super stardom before they actually WIN anything of significance.
    My favorite story is the chocolate addict who drives 20 miles to get his hershey bar and he gets to the counter and asks the service person for his hersheybar….to which the service person replies…Sorry, we’re all out of hershey bars, BUT we have this delicious, tasty, specially yummy, peppermint. How you, as the consumer, respond to this, defines your ease of manipulation in crystal clear psychological terms. “FU”or “No thank you I’ll go to the next store” would be varying degrees of respecting your OWN will and knowing what you want out of life vs the pleasing nature of “OK, I’ll try the peppermint” to which you just sublimated your will to the store owners…now get down on all fours and “BAHHHHH”. Please pay no attention to the metal clanking of shears. That’s a good sheep…here’s your grain, er, peppermint while I go sell your wool for 3 times what the peppermint cost me. (an economics story as old as time).

    Kawhi…exposed…Durant last night. beat him up on both ends. If you watched the game last night without ANY prior spin to opinions. Kawhi looked like the former MVP while Durant looked like a decent role player being overused.

    Aldridge isn’t comfortable yet and it’s obvious in three plays.
    1. The double timeout to get the inbounds correct.

    2. he passed on an elbow jumper that was WIDE open and that is HIS shot.
    3. My Grandmother catches that Green miss and gets off the easy putback…what the hell was that…IN CRUNCH TIME!

    Parker looks terrible. He has always had to eat it on D yet we overlook that due to him pouring in 20 a game and collapsing the D…last night it was painful to watch OKC go to DION FRICKEN WAITERS posting parker in crunchtime…twice…and HE CONVERTS??? I was embarrassed for Tony. I’m not sure we can suffer that defense in big games. We’ll see that many…many times over the season.

    West looked solid. Playing alongside Boris our rebounding suffered.

    Slo mo looked solid last night. Funny how you don’t realize how big he is till he rises up for a shot over his USUALLY smaller defender.

    AT OKC was a coin flip. the loss is not welcome, but not unexpected. We looked VERY good with a few bugs to work out on the whole. The formula still holds true though. Danny Green having a poor offensive game isn’t an automatic loss…it means we struggle…Danny Green having a good offensive game means we blow them off the floor.

    Having Tim and Lemarcus in there together will draw the rim protector away no matter if he’s the 4 or the 5. If he’s on aldridge then LA goes to the 20 footer.

    Rules question. Danny Green gets hung in the air with Adams completely in his face. In desperation Danny lets go a hard bounce pass to Adams left hoping the rolling Duncan will get it. It is too far away and bounces untouched…up into the hoop for the miracle 3…or is it 2. Green was definitely behind the arc when he lets the pass/shot go. What’s the answer?

    Good luck with the site. Have always enjoyed the chocolate of 48MoH. Hate peppermint.

  • Lance MD

    All of this “writer’s angst” and “new direction” for the site comes off as pretty pretentious and masturbatory. Look, I like the Spurs and I enjoy a well written breakdown, but you guys realize that this is just basketball, right? There is nothing particular about your prose and think-piece self-reflection/flagellation that compels me like the site and return to it, so please just tone it down a bit - especially Gordon. You’re taking yourself way too serious.

  • Tyler

    Just my opinion, but I think you missed the whole point of what the writers were saying - they are doing this as a serious hobby (fairly certain 48MofH doesn’t pay the bills; they have day jobs), and the whole grades and game recaps is too taxing, and as a result, takes away from their ability to write the in-depth, complicated and time consuming pieces.