On the Spurs, the 2011 NBA Draft, and solving for pattern

by

At the outset of the Spurs’ offseason, Gregg Popovich said the Spurs had two goals for the summer:

  1. to find a power forward to start next to Tim Duncan
  2. to re-become an elite defensive team next season

Hold onto that for a moment.

One of Wendell Berry’s seminal essays is called Solving for Pattern. Everyone should read it. It’s one of those deeply true because it exudes such plain common sense reads that would benefit just about any person. If you’re a snob, you won’t like it because it’s too obvious. If you’re a pragmatist, you won’t like it because it’s too demanding. But everyone else should love it, and they should read it twice.

Back when Isiah Thomas was ruining the Knicks, I secretly fantasized about a mob of angry New Yorkers belting him upside the head with rolled copies of Solving for Pattern, clinching it tightly in their fists, pleading for front office sanity with each wallop to the back of his head. Or, perhaps, paper air planing loose leafs of Solving for Pattern from the cheap seats into the coach’s huddle during timeouts. New Yorker’s are connoisseurs of every exotic variety of tough love. They could have pulled it off.

Solving for Pattern is about pig farming.

The essay makes this argument: solutions are not really solutions unless they positively impact every aspect of the whole. The point of solutions, rightly understood, are to promote the health of the system. Good solutions are rare, and bad solutions are entirely too common. Bad solutions typically take one of two forms.

The first kind of bad solution is bad because it introduces new problems elsewhere. That is, while a solution may work for its immediate fix, it creates new problem(s) in a different part of the complex.

The second kind of bad solution is bad because it immediately worsens the thing it’s trying to improve.

These two types of solutions often work together. Think of Isiah Thomas fixing his roster of unproductive, overpaid players by surrounding them with more unproductive, overpaid players.

Bad solutions never really solve anything. Bad solutions only compound problems.

Here’s the skinny on good and bad solutions, straight from Berry:

A bad solution is bad, then, because it acts destructively upon the larger patterns in which it is contained. It acts destructively upon those patterns, most likely, because it is formed in ignorance or disregard of them. A bad solution solves for a single purpose or goal, such as increased production. And it is typical of such solutions that they achieve stupendous increases in production at exorbitant biological and social costs.

A good solution is good because it is in harmony with those larger patterns and this harmony will, I think, be found to have a nature of analogy. A bad solution acts within the larger pattern the way a disease or addiction acts within the body. A good solution acts within the larger pattern the way a healthy organ acts within the body…The health of organ and organism is the same, just as the health of organism and ecosystem is the same. And these structures of organ, organism, and ecosystem — as John Todd has so ably understood — belong to a series of analogical integrities that begins with the organelle and ends with the biosphere.

Smart thinkers solve for pattern. Smart thinkers intuitively understand the relationship between all the parts. Basketball teams can be thought of in terms of organ, organism, and ecosystem. Great general managers are always about the business of solving for pattern, of relating player to team and team to franchise. Solving for pattern is what a coach does when he finally determines his team’s best rotations. And so forth and so on.

I spend entirely too much time thinking about what makes the San Antonio Spurs so consistently brilliant. I think about their court performance. I think about their front office performance. I think about how indistinguishable those two parts of their system (“the program”) are from one another. The Spurs are always already thinking in terms of the health of the organ, organism, and the ecosystem. Think of the Spurs’ insistence that their players fit a certain culture. That they be “Spurs”. The Spurs, in other words, think analogically in terms of organ and ecosystem, they relate player to culture.

But they make mistakes. And when they make mistakes, the entire system feels it.

The biggest mistake the Spurs have made is trading for Richard Jefferson. And the theme of their offseason, to this point, is to creatively fix many of the problems he’s introduced.

The Spurs spent the days leading up to the draft looking at Tony Parker trade offers. But make no mistake. The Spurs weren’t trying to trade Tony Parker so much as they were exploring whether Tony Parker was the necessary trade piece to move Richard Jefferson out of town. Mike Monroe saw the situation for exactly what it was:

Reports that the Spurs were discussing deals involving the three-time All-Star and MVP of the 2007 NBA Finals weren’t fiction. But the talks were initiated by teams that had a sense the Spurs were in a mood to blow up their core after the disappointment of the first-round elimination in Memphis.

According to insiders from a team that inquired, each team that called heard the same message from general manager R.C. Buford: Make your best offer, but understand we won’t consider a deal unless Richard Jefferson is part of it.

The talks usually ended there, and when draft night ended Thursday, Parker remained a Spur.

Richard Jefferson is a problem. He’s overpaid. He under-performs. His contract threatens to cripple the Spurs under a more restrictive, cap-tight CBA. Jefferson is a mediocre defender but the Spurs need a wing stopper — the only thing RJ’s defense has put a stop to is Gregg Popovich’s long suffering, patient, and tender disposition.

RJ is, in hindsight, a bad solution. He didn’t improve the thing he was meant to fix: wing production; Bruce Bowen was 10x the basketball player RJ is, box scores be damned! — and his presence has created new problems that didn’t exist prior to his arrival. He’s an organ that is polluting the organism.

Yesterday the Spurs traded George Hill. At first, I didn’t see what R.C. Buford was up to. George Hill was, after all, San Antonio’s best perimeter defender. Why move him when the team has made it a goal to improve defensively? But after a night’s reflection, it’s easy to see that Buford’s design is to solve for pattern.

John Hollinger did a fantastic job explaining the (good) solutions the George Hill trade introduces to the Spurs’ system:

In a stellar trade that showed how they’re always a step ahead of everyone else, the Spurs sent guard George Hill to Indiana for the rights to the 15th pick (Kawhi Leonard), the rights to the 42nd pick (Davis Bertans), and the rights to European Erazem Lorbek.

On paper, trading an established rotation player for the 15th pick in a weak draft seems like a reckless gamble, but there’s a key difference between George Hill and Kawhi Leonard: their paychecks.

Hill will be a restricted free agent after the coming season, and the Spurs looked at their books and made a decision that they couldn’t pay two point guards (Hill and the equally widely shopped Tony Parker) — especially while they were also paying Manu Ginobili, Tim Duncan and Richard Jefferson and looking at a more restrictive post-lockout salary cap environment.

Leonard, meanwhile, will be on a rookie contract for the next four years, providing the Spurs with a very reasonably paid but (likely) productive player to offset the millions they’re paying declining assets like Duncan.

So Hill goes now, before the Spurs have any drama over whether to extend him or risk losing him in restricted free agency next summer. San Antonio keeps its cap situation somewhat under control, and can plug James Anderson, Gary Neal, rookie Cory Joseph and whatever veteran backup point guard they sign into Hill’s former minutes without losing much in the backcourt.

Meanwhile, Leonard fills a more glaring need — a combo forward who can help them match up when opponents go small. This has been an Achilles heel of the Spurs for years, and presuming Leonard can play, he solves the problem.

The Spurs have plenty of work ahead of them. For example, they need find that power forward Gregg Popovich wants, and it won’t be easy. But last night’s trade made them better. It introduced a pattern of improving health to San Antonio immediate and long term future.

  • titletown99030507d

    Makes you wonder why we resigned Tony and Manu. We could have thrown all kinds of Money to FA’s. 

  • titletown99030507d

    I’d like some input as to what kind of line ups we may be seeing after Timmy’s done next season. I know we can’t replace Timmy yada, yada,  but lets get real here what are we looking at with what could be available now and after next season that we can bid for. Actually after next season. Just looking ahead.

  • Pingback: Why the Spurs were wrong to trade George Hill | Numeranda()

  • DorieStreet

     ‘Of the cuff’ roster based largely on who’s here and likely to remain.

    Parker      Neal                  Joseph
    Manu        Anderson
    Butler       Green                Leonard
    FA PF      Blair                   Bonner
    Splitter     FA C                  Lorbek     

  • DorieStreet

    Roster salary will be lower; might as well use the 15th roster spot too– Bertans/Hanga

  • DorieStreet

    We resigned them for this past season = one last shot (or two) at the title.
    61-21, top spot in western conference playoffs–couldn’t ask for a better point from which to start.
    According to Pop, Manu’s injury, poor shooting and some bad play stopped the team.
    According to many fans, Manu’s injury, poor shooting and the frontcourt matchup vs MEM stopped us.
    Replace Jefferson and McDyess; rejuvenate Blair, start Splitter; will that work in a 50-game 2012 season or a normal 2012-13 campaign?

  • td4life

    “At the outset of the Spurs’ offseason, Gregg Popovich said the Spurs had two goals for the summer:
    1.  to find a power forward to start next to Tim Duncan 2.  to re-become an elite defensive team next season ”

    Uh, yeah.  They should have had those goals in mind last year when they were busy overpaying Matt Bonner and negotiating a long deal for RJ (instead of trading his expiring for Tyson Chandler (or at least Tyson Chandler).

    Might as well be optimistic about Leonard, but I do believe Hill could have been bundled with one of those above mentioned overpaid players… Hill can light it up and defend, and will be a good 2-guard in this league; it will be painful to watch if Leonard doesn’t measure up or Anderson remains fragile.

  • td4life

    “At the outset of the Spurs’ offseason, Gregg Popovich said the Spurs had two goals for the summer:
    1.  to find a power forward to start next to Tim Duncan 2.  to re-become an elite defensive team next season ”

    Uh, yeah.  They should have had those goals in mind last year when they were busy overpaying Matt Bonner and negotiating a long deal for RJ (instead of trading his expiring for Tyson Chandler (or at least Tyson Chandler).

    Might as well be optimistic about Leonard, but I do believe Hill could have been bundled with one of those above mentioned overpaid players… Hill can light it up and defend, and will be a good 2-guard in this league; it will be painful to watch if Leonard doesn’t measure up or Anderson remains fragile.

  • td4life

    “At the outset of the Spurs’ offseason, Gregg Popovich said the Spurs had two goals for the summer:
    1.  to find a power forward to start next to Tim Duncan 2.  to re-become an elite defensive team next season ”

    Uh, yeah.  They should have had those goals in mind last year when they were busy overpaying Matt Bonner and negotiating a long deal for RJ (instead of trading his expiring for Tyson Chandler (or at least Tyson Chandler).

    Might as well be optimistic about Leonard, but I do believe Hill could have been bundled with one of those above mentioned overpaid players… Hill can light it up and defend, and will be a good 2-guard in this league; it will be painful to watch if Leonard doesn’t measure up or Anderson remains fragile.

  • feingarten

    The trade for Leonard may very well prove to an excellent choice but it will only be excellent and justified IF and that’s a BIG IF, Leonard turns into the second coming of Bruce Bowen.

    Should he fall short, Spurs fans will be very irritate and extremely disappointed to have given up a proven player for a kid whose ‘talent’ may not be as good as advertised

  • TD BestEVER

    Ya like I said there’s no reason to restructure when the FO isn’t going to make any serious additions anyway…..plus If they weren’t so cheap in the past with the $$$$$ We would have more titles and a proven player to replace TD………..instead we are stuck with POP

  • Pingback: Will a new amnesty provision help the Spurs get rid of RJ?()

  • http://khandorssportsblog.com/wordpress khandor

    Tim,

    Great read, as always.

    IMO, the Spurs absolutely owned this year’s NBA Draft … with their trade of George Hill and selections of David Bertans, Adam Hanga … each of whom holds the possibility of becoming a future “star” player in the NBA … Cory Joseph and Kawhi Leonard.

    That is simply a gigantic haul of NBA level talent … in return for losing only George Hill.

    The Spurs are the best run operation in the entire NBA … because of doing stuff like THIS – i.e. “Solving for pattern” – on the regular.

    Cheers

  • DorieStreet

    Put more emphasis on “future” –until Bertans and Hanga show up in America   -along with Nando de Colo and Ryan Richards– this “giantic haul of NBA level talent is just potential.
    Given the amount of time that goes from draft night to summer league tryout for the Spurs’ international picks (if they do sign a contract)—
    1/3 to 50% of the roster you listed on your sports blog will be gone.
    McDyess, Duncan, RJ–definitely –this season or next. I don’t see any of the Euro’s getting over here until 2013-14.

  • JSandy

    They still need another reliable big man capable of scoring. Duncan is just too slow at this point to take on a zach randolph one on one.  Another glaring problem i see is there distinct lack of shotmaking in the postseason, i have noticed this the last few playoffs, when 3 point shot windows get shorter and much better contested they can not make them at nearly the clip they need to.  They suceeded in the regular season because nba teams are lazy as hell in the regular season, and do not run out on shooters like they do in the postseason

  • Titletown99030507d

    A shot or two? One which has transpired but the two. No way. 

  • Titletown99030507d

    Yeah, plus we’ll be able to get a better look a Splitter next season without what the if’s. You know the slow start because of injury and Pop’s don’t change what ain’t broke mentality. Yeah look what it got us. 

  • Pingback: Making Sense Of Draft Day | Spurs Planet()

  • Pingback: FIBA Eurobasket, Americas Championship boast Spurs players()

  • Pingback: Kawhi Leonard erases any NBA Finals drama as series MVP()