On the R.C. Buford rumor

by

Plenty of discussion to come regarding James Anderson and Ryan Richards, but we would be remiss not to address reports that R.C. Buford is a target in Paul Allen’s search to replace Kevin Pritchard.

We should start with what this isn’t.

If Buford is a target, or, as a friend pointed out, even if he’s been contacted by Allen’s headhunter, this is an entirely different thing than having interviewed for the position. The current reports deal in potentiality, not actuality. R.C. Buford’s only statement regarding the Blazers search for a new GM sends a clear signal that his interest in the Blazers job, if there is any, is trumped by his desire to extend professional courtesy to Kevin Pritchard.

“Kevin still has a job, and I don’t think people should interfere,” Buford said Wednesday.

Reading between the lines, it’s doubtful that Buford has had a formal interview with Portland.

Nevertheless, it’s not a great secret that R.C. Buford is one of the best GMs in the NBA. He’s a major force behind the best run team in sports. It’s hard to imagine a better candidate for the Blazers GM position than R.C. Buford. Interestingly, former Spurs front-office personnel Sam Presti and Danny Ferry are rumored to be in the mix, as well.

If I’m R.C. Buford, I’m very curious to hear Paul Allen’s offer. The Blazers will spend to win, and have one of the best young rosters in the NBA. San Antonio is one kind of basketball paradise, and Portland another. If the Blazers make a formal pitch to Buford, it’s like selling a citizen of Nassau on the beauty of Barbados. If a beach is a beach, Paul Allen’s strategy might simply mean offering  Buford a bigger house.

From a Spurs fan perspective, these rumors introduce a surprising layer of anxiety to the offseason. Spurs assistant GM Dennis Lindsey is a lead candidate for the Suns’ vacant GM position. And although Gregg Popovich is the President of Basketball Operations, he’s long since left the grind of front office work in the capable hands of Buford.

In an unexpected offseason twist, the Spurs’ lauded front office could turnover this summer. Â It’s premature to speculate whether the Spurs would lean more heavily on Popovich, turn to a current assistant such as Dell Demps (Mike Budenholzer?) or look to hire from without. Â Probably something else entirely. But the revolving door will have gone full-circle if Danny Ferry, Steve Kerr or Kevin Pritchard were suddenly in the conversation to replace Buford and/or Lindsey.

We’ll have entered a new era of Spurs basketball-one not ushered into existence by the retirement of Tim Duncan-if Buford takes another job. He’s at the center of all that the San Antonio Spurs do well.

  • MCS

    Guys:
    Nobody mentions FA Channing Frye, I think he will be a nice athletic big that can spread the floor and is also cheao

  • BigJ

    @Trade Tp

    Funny how we don’t hear a lot of press on the point you make. Certainly the press won’t call him a “pussy”, but not only would James be reviled in Ohio if he leaves, he will be stained with a weakness label that will wear on him like a scarlet letter.

    @Hobson 13

    Could not have said it better about Shaq. There are few atheletes more egotistical and self centered than he.

  • DieHardSpur

    CONCERNING SHAQ:

    15 minutes a game will not put us any close to contention that we were last year. If we had any player in the league - regardless how good he was (Lebron), he couldnt make us a contender if he was only giving us 15 minutes.

    I bring up 15 minutes becuase that is realistically all that shaq could provide us. Any more time on the floor and he would be taking up space and become a defensive and offensive liability…

    Shaq - Thanks, but NO THANKS!!!

  • sydneylla

    What’s the deal here? Five days since there was a post of any consequence? No pre-free agency pieces? No analysis of possible bi-annual exception players we should be looking at? Is there anyone left at the mother ship?

  • Trade Tp

    Big J - I like Lebron. I think hes good for basketball being intertaining and such. But in my opinion hes a biatch if he leaves. Its not the coach (he chooses the coach), its not really the players (he chooses them too), he just doesnt have the WILL to win. He would rather be like Sidney in White Men Cant Jump; look good and lose than look bad and win.

    Hes more of an entertainer than a basketball player.

    He could leave his mark as one of the greatest in the game if he stayed in Cleveland and tried to win rather than begging other superstars to let him win.

  • idahospur

    Definitely do not want Shaq. More of an FYI in that post.
    Agree with sydneylla.

  • BigJ

    @ Trade Tp

    I agree. After all I’ve read over the last few weeks it’s clear the James’ Collective (he and his crew largess) have been in complete control of his image, the hype and the potential. My concern for him is “if” he peaks the process and ends up in the Big Apple (for example) and gets all that he wants, what happens if he doesn’t deliver?

    Conversely, if he returns to Cleveland and simply wins one title there he will have accomplished something Jim Brown couldn’t even do. Given nothing else, his legacy in the state of Ohio would be etched in stone.

  • Spicy

    BREAKING NEWS… Richard Jefferson opts out of final season of contract leaving 15 million on the table for free agency, according to KSAT news.

    Finally a chance to upgrade the roster. Now have at it RC Buford. Time to rework the roster.

  • Spicy

    The move will move the Spurs below the luxury tax line, but not the projected salary cap. It does not necessarily mean the Jefferson era in San Antonio is over… (one can only hope)

    Jefferson, who arrived in a trade with Milwaukee last offseason, never quite reached expectations in San Antonio. (there’s an understatement) He averaged 12.3 points and 4.4 rebounds in his first — and perhaps, only — season with the Spurs.

  • Andrew

    Sorry, this has nothing to do with the post or the replies but after reading all the rumblings about free agents and what not, it’s nice to see Kevin Durant not playing games (except for basketball). Kevin Durant is all of what good basketball should be, too bad he isn’t a Spur…

  • Sam

    SPICY
    holy shit man i just read the article on nba.com we can now afford some helpful free agents

  • BigJ

    Certainly makes the Spurs off season more entertaining. I’m curious if there is more going on behind the scenes here that will develop regarding RJ.

  • lvmainman

    Wow, RJ stuck it to the Spurs. Opts out and the Spurs still have maybe $3.5 million to sign a free agent?

    Did Popovich wear out, grate on, and annoy all the Spurs this past season? Mason, Finley, Ratliff, Haslip, Jefferson all wanted to leave the Spurs! 5 players wanted out at all costs!

    Front office has really messed up the chances of a championship in the last year. 6 expiring contracts and not 1 is used to improve the team? Stephen Jackson to be had for a bag of chips, Caron Butler to be had, Yi Jianlian available, Corey Maggette to be had.

    Looking bleak for the Spurs. Just wait until they add Tracy McGrady for the NBA minimum. It means Tony Parker will get paid, though.

  • Jim Henderson

    lvmainman
    June 30th, 2010 at 5:47 pm

    “Did Popovich wear out, grate on, and annoy all the Spurs this past season? Mason, Finley, Ratliff, Haslip, Jefferson all wanted to leave the Spurs! 5 players wanted out at all costs!”

    There’s always reshuffling going on with any NBA team these days. Besides, the Spurs are not going to EVER win with those players on their team anyways. Good riddance!

    “Front office has really messed up the chances of a championship in the last year.”

    There one of the best front offices in the league. That is, unless you know of any FO from a medium to low market that’s ever been able to win 4 titles during an 8-year span. They’re not God. The rate of success they’ve had is simply unsustainable over a LONG period of time. Do you even know how difficult it is to win a championship?

  • lvmainman

    @ Jim Henderson,

    Might be the 2nd time our opinions have been in agreement, since you support my statement the front office has really messed up in the last year by not being proactive with their expiring contracts.

  • Jim Henderson

    lvmainman
    June 30th, 2010 at 6:34 pm

    “…..you support my statement the front office has really messed up in the last year by not being proactive with their expiring contracts.”

    All I can say is that they have not been able to “get it done” in this regard recently. I would imagine that they’ve been pretty “active”, but just have not been able to make the right deal work with the right team (we’ll never know for sure how “active” they’ve been so far this off-season). At this point, it remains difficult to indict the Spurs FO on this front. Sooner or later though they’re going to have to make some sweet moves again that pan out better. And despite my frustration at the moment, I won’t be surprised if they do. Stay tuned …….

  • Jacob

    I agree about Frye. If he is available for at or about the same price that Phoenix had him for, I say we nab him. He’s longer, taller, younger, has a better ppg, 3 pt % (playoffs INCLUDED), and rebound rate than Bonner. I dont care if we have Bonners bird rights or not, Frye could still be had for less than Bonner, even considering his tax, and unlike Bonner his play actually excelled in the playoffs.

    Another free agent that I would like to see us go after is Josh Childress. He is an excellent defender and his length and athletic ability would be a welcomed addition to our wing defenders.