Roger Mason Jr.: An unfinished portrait

by

Roger Mason jr

Watercolor by Jesse Blanchard

Whether through a series of unfortunate circumstances or simply misplaced expectations, The Legacy of Big Shot Rog will likely end as one of the most regrettably unfinished chapters in recent San Antonio Spurs history.

Roger Mason Jr. came to San Antonio with little expectations from Spurs fans but quickly endeared himself to the AT&T Center crowds with clutch shot after clutch shot. There was the Clippers game. The Phoenix Suns on Christmas. The Lakers and Celtics. Â He was Big Shot Rog:

His shot is so elegant. He is the essence of a pure shooter. His feet are square. His hands are high. His body and the floor form a perfect right angle. He can stop on a dime and still go straight up. And even when being fouled, which obviously limits his ability to maintain such idyllic physical composition, the mangled forms of his shot shine through. You see each little puzzle piece working tirelessly to make sure the shot remains on target. Some might call it “focus” but I think it comes from something slightly different. It radiates from his confidence. Not just confidence. Charisma. Roger Mason Jr.’s late game heroics are like an unexpected baptism.

That portrait of Roger Mason Jr., written over a year ago by Graydon, was everything the San Antonio Spurs needed this season. Because of that first impression, head coach Gregg Popovich stuck with Mason through all of his struggles. But even given every opportunity, Mason never had a chance.

With the acquisition of Richard Jefferson, the return of Manu Ginobili and the ascension of George Hill, Mason found himself on the wrong end of a minutes crunch. And then there was the injury, a torn ligament on his shooting hand that required surgery.

As far as contract years go, few have had as bad a go at it as Roger Mason Jr. did this season. His three point and free throw shooting each dropped nearly 10 percentage points (42% to 32% and 89% to 79%) and his scoring average was cut in half, from 12 points per game to six.

To his credit, Mason never made any excuses and with the exception of a leaked trade request, he publicly played the part of consummate professional. In many ways, Roger Mason Jr. was the perfect typecast of a Spurs role player-a three-point specialist who, while limited, fit in seamlessly with the San Antonio Spurs star players and the character of the team.

In any number of parallel universes where a handful of things go differently, it’s not too hard to picture Roger Mason Jr. following Mario Elie, Steve Kerr and Robert Horry in the pantheon of San Antonio Spurs role players who shined on a title team.

Unfortunately for Mason, he was either physically unable to perform or was simply asked to do too much. Throughout his tenure in San Antonio, Mason constantly had to acclimate himself to different roles as Tony Parker, Manu Ginobili and Tim Duncan shuffled in and out of the lineup.

Whether due to injuries or Tim Duncan’s emerging inability to consistently draw double teams, for a spot-up shooter Mason continuously found himself taking on more playmaking responsibilities than his skill set is capable of.

Advertised as an emergency ball handler, Roger Mason Jr. is a point guard only in the sense that he can dribble just well enough to bring the ball up the court. Still, Mason was thrust into this role due to injuries and the fact that the Spurs current backup point guard, George Hill, shares the same weakness without the benefit (in theory) of Mason’s off the dribble jumper.

Ideally, Mason is a one or two dribble player who thrives off of others’ dribble penetration or double teams. The San Antonio Spurs brought him in to be exactly that player.

But like a brilliantly designed play that executes perfectly in every way except the finish, Roger Mason Jr.’s work here was incomplete. If there were a moment to sum up his season, it would be such a play against the Cleveland Cavaliers.

Coming out of a timeout down three in the closing seconds, head coach Gregg Popovich diagrammed the perfect play-an open look for Roger Mason Jr. Almost every moment screams success, even the follow through on the jump shot, only for whatever reason it just doesn’t work out.

Despite his struggles this season, Roger Mason Jr. is definitely an NBA player, just not likely with the San Antonio Spurs any longer. Nor is his career likely to approach the heights it reached his first season here, which is regrettable, because the story of Big Shot Rog had too promising a start for such an anticlimactic finish.

  • doggydogworld

    It’s difficult to find good character guys like Roger who have both the humility to accept a secondary role and the courage and talent to step up and make the big shot.

  • http://espn.com Jacob

    adios amigo

  • http://blackprint.cc The Wes Reviews

    I blame RJ.

  • TrueFan

    I could’ve just imagined it, but Roger’s form seemed a little off all year. The best way to describe it was cocky-lazy, like he forgot the fundamentals this year because he was so successful last year. It’s unfortunate that he couldn’t contribute timely 3s en route to another championship.

  • Tyler

    It’s hard for me to believe he’s as bad as he played this year. Seemed like the season just snowballed for him - got into a funk which he could never get out of. Combine that with an injury…. No excuses though - he was terrible.

    I always liked Roger off the court. For Roger’s sake, hopefully a change of scenery (and an offseason of recovery/work) will do the trick.

  • Renato

    This article outlines exactly y I was critical of pop all season long. Rodger Mason Jr should have been the starting 3 and RJ should have been on the bench. As the article points out, the spurs tried to make him some1 he was not while destroying the player he was. I understand the injury played a big role, but this dates back to last year when they were using him as a point gaurd.

    I have many times on this blog also been critical of the front office for its lack of development of young talent. Consider that both dragic and barbosa of the suns were drafted by the spurs. Would not one of those players fix the problem of the lack of a second point gaurd on the team or jump shooter, allowing us to not destroy mason and be forced to aquire RJ? I felt RJs aquasition was a lack of faith in Hill as well, that he could not become that 4th scoring option.

  • lvmainman

    Mason not the perfect fit for the Spurs because of his need for a rhythm dribble to shoot as evidenced by the Clippers, Lakers, Celtics game winners.

    Spurs need a catch and shoot 3 pt shooter in the mold of Elie, Elliot, Kerr, Jackson, Horry, Barry, and Finley. There are some available in free agency but the Spurs won’t be able to afford them without a trade. From Redick, Korver, Morrow, Bell, or Miller (my #1 choice because he has size and can pass), I hope the Spurs get someone that can make a 3.

    Speaking of Finley, even though he hardly plays, did he join the right team at the right time or what?

  • McSpur

    @Renato

    The Spurs drafted Barbosa and Dragic on behalf of the Suns. They were their picks all along.

  • http://48minutesofhell.com Jesse Blanchard

    I do not think Mason’s struggles came due to cockiness or laziness. At his best he was the epitome of a Spurs role player for more than his skill set. Having bounced around the NBA and Europe, Mason has as Pop likes to put it, “gotten over himself”. Remember, he worked diligently in the offseason to come back lighter and quicker (not sure that it worked, but he did it).

    I think that his struggles at the beginning of the year came due to Parker and Ginobili’s inability to break down a defense early in the season and teams deciding not to double Duncan. Defenses were staying at home on shooters and if you remember, the entire team was at one point in a shooting slump because of it. I want to say that as he seemed to be hitting his stride, he had an ankle injury or something…does anyone remember for sure? Then came the hand injury.

    He did not make an excuse and he was out on the court, so yeah, he has to be judged on his performance though his performances are a little more understandable given his injury. It’s not always an excuse if it’s a legitimate reason.

    And regarding the coaching and front office: It would’ve been hard to keep Mason in the starting lineup. Eventually, a guy just has to produce and he didn’t. He was used as a point guard mainly because the Spurs did not have a lot of options at the time. Last year, Mason was a better offensive player than Hill and even now, their half court abilities at the point guard spot are very similar in that neither really break down defenses.

    The Spurs technically drafted Dragic and Barbosa, but they were in prearranged deals so they were players that Phoenix told them to take. With Barbosa, they already had and were trying to work with Beno Udrih. The Dragic trade was the one that acquired Blair, and seeing as how he hasn’t really been heard from since that fourth quarter I feel the Spurs still came out ahead on that one.

  • idahospur

    Name of the Spurs game: Produce or leave. Many players have off years and unfortunately, consequences follow. It’s just my hope that if he gets out of San Antonio to get as far away as possible. It always hurts seeing a former Spur in another jersey. Best of luck Roger.

  • Emils Ozers

    RMj time is over.
    I hope Spurs take Raja Bell in FA. He can make good shots and can lock down his match up in defensive end. He could become second Bowen. Good fit for Spurs.

  • http://48minutesofhell.com Jesse Blanchard

    While I do agree that RMJ time here is probably done, I’m not so sure Bell is the answer. He was already slowing in Phoenix a bit, only no one remembers because he was traded to Charlotte and then injured his wrist. I’m not sure how the layoff from basketball will treat him. That’s not to say he won’t have a good season, just that there are no guarantees and chances aren’t likely.

  • rj

    great piece on roger, but he never seemed to be a spot up shooter. he was more of an off the dribble shooter. he shot much better in motion of a screen than from the corner or any other spot. maybe i’m wrong.

    nice painting. facial symmetry needs a little work though

    are we to expect individual articles/paintings (lol) of each spur? really looking forward to it

  • Kevin

    Did you paint this unfinished portrait just for the sake of illustrating this blog posting? If so, then hats off to you.

    If not… then why, exactly, were you making a painting of RMJ?

  • BALLHOG

    Since Coach Pop pretty much ended Rog Mason’s career…Hope he is willing to front Rog a couple months rent, at least!

    Playing Mason at point was a career killer…Exposed too many flaws in his game..

  • boris

    Good article, totally disagree with Renato. It could be the surgery, it could be the contract, but basically this season whenever the Spurs needed Roger to hit a shot he clanged it. If you’re primarily a three point shooter and you shave 10% off yr percentage, I don’t think that’s a role issue (he had a ton of open looks). I always really liked him but he just killed the Spurs this season. He might be done.

  • Bushka

    Wow would not have seen that coming, ballhog has used an article on Roger Mason to illustrate that Pop is an imbecile.

    In other news Tim Duncan is tall, and Tony Parker is fluent in French and English…

  • Bob

    Unfortunately Renato the spurs FO can’t keep every player they draft/sign. Some players dont flourish in the spurs environment (perfect example RJ) but others do (Mr reliable bruce bowen). Sure dragic had one deadly game against us in the 2nd round but in other times during the playoffs he has dissappeared. We missed out on scolas presence but with the pick we got from his trade, we got blair. Instead of asking for splitter, maybe we should be hoping the FO get themselves a crystal ball.
    PS. whoever suggested bobby jones as a potential FA target, was right on the money. What happened with his previous stint with the spurs?? Does anyone know

  • Kevin
  • Renato

    Those are examples of players not saying those would have been the picks. Here is my overall point, for too long the spurs concentrated on the now without thinking of the future. Season after season they installed quick fixes at back up PG and Center. This season, they tried to do it at SF. The problem is Duncan no longer can hide weaknesses on the team. The past 2 drafts are first time I have seen the spurs address the problem with their age by drafting young players and having them stick. They need a balance between both, veterans and devloping talent, not just signing veterans as quick fixes

  • doggydogworld

    Renato, it’s kind of silly to chastise the Spurs for not building through the draft. We haven’t had an early pick in a dozen years yet we’ve got two stars and two solid role players with late first and second round picks. Next year we might add Splitter to the mix. Show me another team that’s getting that kind of contribution from such late picks.

  • Bushka

    Renato I find that difficult to agree with. Mahinmi was a future project pick, as was Splitter and George was a guard to groom to take over from Manu/TP.

    Nando De Colo is the same and despite the unfortunate loss of Scola he was also a plan for the future pick. Not to mention that when we couldn’t get something good from that we turned it into Blair.

    The spurs bought an entire minor league franchise into the fray to plan for the future and develop and stash players i.e Hairston Mahinmi etc etc.

    This is without bringing in the whole Draft better than the other guys scenario where we get all stars like Parker & Manu at ridiculously late numbers.

    They are one of if not the most forward thinking plan for the future franchises in the entire league.

  • Jim Henderson

    doggydogworld
    May 25th, 2010 at 7:44 pm

    That’s a good point, doggy.

  • SpursfanSteve

    Not to mention that by thinking of the now we were able to win 4 titles. Just sayin. You keep drafting project players, there is no telling if they will mature at the same rate so they can produce on the court at the same time.

  • Renato

    There needs to be a balance.

    @Doggyworld: As I stated, hill and blair were the fist 2. Its key to remember the spurs did not develop manu, rather chose a good player.

    The spurs have always had a good eye for talent. But what is the point of drafting players if they are never goin to develop?

    @Bushka: They have a D-league team, they have players in europe, yet look at the team that won championships, how many were drafted by the spurs. Excluding TP & Duncan who were drafted and developed by the spurs, you have manu who was drafted but not developed by the spurs and udrith, although he brarely played.

    My point is at the end of the bench you always have 2 or 3 guys who never play or who play mop of duty or spot minutes. For too long the spurs put veteran players instead of maybe one or 2 young talents to try and develop. Would the spurs have lost a championship if they had a young developmental big instead of a veteran on the bench? prob not

  • http://48minutesofhell.com Jesse Blanchard

    Renato, I’m not really sure what the complaint is or how many young developmental guys you want on a roster trying to win a championship?

    This past season at different points you had Ian Mahinmi, Marcus Haislip, Malik Hairston, Alonzo Gee, Garrett Temple and Curtis Jerrells on the roster. Not to mention Hill and Blair who are still developing. (btw, the Dragic trade brought back Malik Hairston AND DeJuan Blair if I’m not mistaken, so thats two young talents for one…should that still be brought up?)

    A year earlier Marcus Williams was included in that mix, and for a brief time Pops Mensah-Bonsu.

    Matt Bonner is a rotation player who the Spurs brought in and developed somewhat. Around the time they acquired him they also tried Jackie Butler.

    On the wings the Spurs have had looks at DerMarr Johnson, James White and Linton Johnson off the top of my head.

    At the point guard, prior to Hill there was Beno and prior to Beno, Tony Parker was the developing point guard.

    In the pipeline we have James Gist, Tiago Splitter and Nando De Colo…and I think Williams might even be back in Austin.

    I’ll end this by saying that the two teams likely to reach the Finals, the Lakers and Celtics, have a minimal amount of young talent on the roster. The Lakers drafted Bynum (with a lottery pick) and got Shannon Brown. Farmar can’t beat out Fisher. The Celtics snagged Big Baby with a late pick, but Perkins was acquired when they were horrible and had minutes to force feed him. Rondo is in the same situation as Parker and there’s not young PG’s behind him.

  • doggydogworld

    @Bushka, the Scola trade netted us cash, Vassilis Spanoulis and the 53rd pick in 2009 which we used on Nando De Cola. The 37th pick which got us Blair was not involved in that trade. It came from Phoenix in the Dragic/Hairston trade.

    That Phoenix trade was wild. Our 2008 #45 for their 2008 #48 and 2009 #37. They gave up a 2nd round pick just to move from 48 to 45??? These draft-day trades are usually done while the clock is still running, and the teams then make the official selections per the other’s direction. The Suns were the only team who worked out Dragic — he was their guy all along. It’s possible Hairston was our guy all along. We already had a 26 year old Tony Parker and a newly-drafted George Hill, making Dragic somewhat redundant. If we had indeed planned to pick Malik Hairston at #45 then we got DeJuan Blair for free.

  • Tyler

    Good discussion. Personally, I’m pretty happy with the results of our draft picks over the last decade or so. No other team that has consistently drafted at the bottom of the 1st round has had as much success as the Spurs. We’ve done a lot with very little.

    And despite our struggles this past season and our aging core, I think our future is pretty bright. As NBA franchises go, we’re in a position of strength. We have one of the best owners in sports, a FO that has demonstrated they know how to put together a winner, and a decent mix of experience and youth (and getting younger).

    We’re like the Johnson & Johnson of the NBA - a solid, extremely well run company, yet unspectacular or flashy, who over the long run, crushes the competition.

    Can next season start already?

  • Jim Henderson

    Look, the Spurs have TWO number one picks since 1987: David Robinson & Tim Duncan. I don’t think there’s ANY team in the history of the league that has had a success ratio like that. Unbelievable. There’s only been a handful of teams that have had even ONE number one pick of this caliber in the last 20 years, and most of them weren’t able to keep them for 10+ years, as the Spurs did with TD & the Admiral.

    How do you top that?!

  • Joe

    There is no such thing as a true rebuilding process without a top-10 pick, which we haven’t had since we got Timmy. Even with a pick that high, you still have to get pretty lucky. At the time, who other than Bill Simmons thought Greg Oden would be anything less than the next best big in the game?

    I don’t really agree with the argument that we haven’t developed young talent enough, but even if that were true, there is a benefit of completely crashing once our window shuts. The past 20 years have shown that acquiring very high draft picks at the same time that you clear a ton of cap space is one of the best ways to rebuild a true contender. How many teams get stuck drafting between 10 and 20 each year, making them not good enough to hope for anything better than a low playoff seed but not bad enough to get real help?

  • Jim Henderson

    Joe
    May 26th, 2010 at 1:10 pm

    “There is no such thing as a true rebuilding process without a top-10 pick, which we haven’t had since we got Timmy.”…….

    ……..”How many teams get stuck drafting between 10 and 20 each year, making them not good enough to hope for anything better than a low playoff seed but not bad enough to get real help?”

    I don’t agree with your basic premise (you’re putting too much faith in lottery picks), although I don’t really know what you mean by, a “true rebuilding process”. In my view, it’s not necessary to crash & burn first before you begin the process of building yourself back into contention. There’s been a ton of mid-to-late first round picks that have gone on to have VERY productive careers, and of course, acquiring “key” pieces through shrewd trades & free agency pick ups can also help get a team back on top. There’s no reason to just let a team play out the string and implode so that you can just “hope” to get back on top in 5-10 years though a “true rebuilding” process. This clearly describes a case whereby “conventional wisdom” does not in fact represent the most sound strategy.

  • http://48minutesofhell.com Jesse Blanchard

    Except for in the NBA, elite stars win championships. And those guys are generally top lottery picks. The 15 and back guys are usually secondary stars, and as the Atlanta Hawks have proven, you do not win in this league with a roster full of them. And as the Cavs proved, you can have the best player in the league, but if you do not have a secondary star, you’re still in trouble.

    The All-NBA Teams:
    LeBron James-No. 1 overall pick
    Kevin Durant-No. 2 overall pick
    Dwight Howard-No. 1 overall pick
    Kobe Bryant-No. 13 (and probably would have been in the top 10 had he not been one of the first high school wings in the lottery)
    Dwyane Wade-No. 5 overall pick

    Carmelo Anthony-No. 3 overall pick
    Dirk Nowitzki-No. 9 overall pick (would have gone higher had the Euro invasion happened earlier).
    Amare Stoudemire-No. 9 overall pick
    Steve Nash-No. 15 overall pick
    Deron Williams-No. 3 overall pick

    Tim Duncan-No. 1 overall pick
    Pau Gasol-No. 3 overall pick
    Andrew Bogut-No. 1 overall pick
    Joe Johnson-No. 10 overall pick
    Brandon Roy-No. 6 overall pick

    Of the people who you can build franchises around, only Nash currently is out of the top 10. Rondo remains a possibility, but you have to remember who he is flanked by (Pierce and Garnett), but he has an opportunity. Of teams without an MVP quality player, the Pistons are the only team in recent memory to prove the exception to the rule.

    And finding franchise players in the mid-to-late lottery? The best opportunities were probably nabbing a high school or an unknown foreign prospect, but those are hardly possibilities now, are they?

  • Bushka

    Jesse & Doggy you are both obviously right on the money.

    I forgot that Spanoulis and his return to Greece was the Scola pick.

    Renato,

    I don’t understand your viewpoint. The spurs have been a mostly home developed team for quiet some time, and make an absolute living out of resurrecting other teams off cuts.

    Bowen is the most obvious, but every year we tinker with bits and bobs that no one else in the league wanted.

    The idea that Manu was developed elsewhere doesn’t hold water, he still got drafted by the Spurs not the Knicks or the Rockets…

    George Dejaun Parker Ginobli Duncan Hairston are all rotation players and were all drafted by the team. Mahinmi was a draft pick as well.

    Bonner was developed and given an opportunity by us (he was another off cut). Thats the majority of our starting five and bench directly attributable to the home team…

    Not to mention we still have Splitter and De Colo stashed for the future and a #20 pick coming in this year.

    Not to mention the massive infusion of talent placed in Austin to develop for the future guys like Gee Jerrels Temple Williams.

    Tolliver Haislip Gist were all either stashed in Europe or dragged in to have a shot at the stretch four slot.

    The spurs don’t really leave a stone unturned in the quest for personell. They swung hard at the RJ trade by setting up their contract structure brilliantly (semi guaranteed final year contracts are the best expirings money can buy).

    This front office is smart and ludicrously lucky.

  • Jim Henderson

    Jesse Blanchard
    May 26th, 2010 at 6:04 pm

    “Except for in the NBA, elite stars win championships. And those guys are generally top lottery picks.”

    Granted, generally, but by no means prohibitively. Hell, just look at the Spurs, Tony Parker & Manu Ginobli. In addition, oftentimes lottery picks are acquired through free agency or through trades (see the Pistons, and Celtics last title teams, for examples). The idea that they must be your original draft pick is not born out by history.

    “The 15 and back guys are usually secondary stars …… and as the Atlanta Hawks have proven, you do not win in this league with a roster full of them.”

    There are several reasons why the Hawks have not gone deep into the playoffs, but a lack of lottery picks on their roster is not one of them. In fact, they have six:

    Joe Smith - #1
    Marvin Williams - #2
    Mike Bibby - #2
    Al Horford - #3
    Jamal Crawford - #8
    Joe Johnson - #10

    By contrast, the defending champion Lakers have five:

    Gasol - #3
    Odom - #4
    Morrison - #3 (HUGE bust)
    Bynum - #10
    Bryant - #13

    Meanwhile, the Spurs won a title in 2006-2007 with two lottery picks:

    Duncan - #1
    Horry - #11 (acquired as a FA)

    Out of all the All-NBA players you list, only four (Bryant, Gasol, Wade, & Duncan have won titles, comprised of just 3 different teams. Most of the other principal lottery picks that played beside these players during their championship years were acquired through trade or free agency.

    Drafting one’s own lottery picks is by no means the main way that teams win championships. That is a misconception. Look at the Lakers, look at the Celtics, look at the Spurs, look at the Heat; the teams that have won all the titles for the past decade. Three of them have just one lottery pick that they themselves drafted, and one had no lottery picks that they drafted. And if you look at Parker (and we could conceivably have him for a good five more years), he has put up a career that is better than about 75% of all lottery picks in the past dozen years. No, we don’t need to get to the draft lottery any time soon, and we could still have a decent chance for a title over the next several years, if we think outside the box, play our cards right by being open to bold moves, and of course, have some luck in our drafts & acquisitions. And, well, luck is always a part of the equation.

  • Bushka

    Drafting a lottery pick that turns out to be one of the all time best ever seems to be the consensus.

  • Jim Henderson

    From my post above:

    “Look at the Lakers, look at the Celtics, look at the Spurs, look at the Heat; the teams that have won all the titles for the past decade. Three of them have just one lottery pick that they themselves drafted, and one had no lottery picks that they drafted.”

    *correction*

    All four teams listed above drafted one major star lottery pick (Bryant, Pierce, Wade) unless you want to count Andrew Bynum, who did not even play for the second half of the season in the year that team won the title (last year).

    What I forgot to mention is the Pistons title team of 2003-2004, which beat a Kobe & Shaq team in 5 games in the finals. That team had no lottery picks that they themselves drafted. Their lottery picks were acquired through trade (R. Wallace, R. Hamilton), or free agency (Billups).

    One thing I will concede:

    A common variable for those teams that get a shot at winning “multiple” titles, often back to back, is apparently having the opportunity & luck to draft a MEGA star in the lottery. Think of Magic & the Lakers, Bird & the Celtics, Isiah & the Pistons, MJ & the Bulls, Hakeem & the Rockets, Kobe & the Lakers, Duncan & the Spurs. That’s some pretty select company. Even if you get in the lottery now and then, the chances of you getting that type of player is VERY slim. We’re very fortunate as Spurs fans (to have had a shot at multiple titles), and in select company indeed.

  • Joe

    @ Jim & Jesse:

    Good points, but I think the Hawks are not a prime example — they’ve drafted terribly and would be much, much better if they’d made better choices. For example, in 2006, they could have had Brandon Roy instead of Shelden Williams. In 2005, they could have had Chris Paul or Deron Williams.

    Your observation, Jim, that high draft picks don’t necessarily make you a contender is very good, but I would argue that sometimes that’s because teams don’t know when to cash in their chips. For example, if the Bulls had pulled the trigger on the KG deal when they had a chance, they would be legit contenders instead of perennial contenders for a low playoff seed. The same is true of the Warriors.

    My point is that you don’t have to keep your high draft picks to build a championship contender, you just have to make good choices to maximize their value rather than holding onto assets too long to the point that their value depreciates substantially. You’ve gotta know when to hold ’em, know when to fold ’em . . .

  • Jim Henderson

    Joe
    May 27th, 2010 at 12:24 pm

    “My point is that you don’t have to keep your high draft picks to build a championship contender, you just have to make good choices to maximize their value rather than holding onto assets too long to the point that their value depreciates substantially. You’ve gotta know when to hold ‘em, know when to fold ‘em . . .”

    Well, I agree with that, and not just in terms of a teams own high draft picks. Thus, for example, we should consider trading in our “diamonds in the rough” before the quality of these gems begin to deteriorate even further (Manu, McDyess), and pick up some young stones with their shine intact (Harden - Age - 22 - 3rd pick, 2009; Collison, Age 29, 12th pick, 2003, D.J. White, Age 23 - 29th pick, 2008). It’d be a good deal for BOTH teams.

    A link on PF’s (White included) coming out of college in 2008:

    http://www.draftexpress.com/article/Just-By-The-Numbers-Evaluating-This-Year-s-Power-Foward-Crop-2935/

  • http://www.ldhl89.blogspot.com Luis

    Ginobili in offense 2009 - 2010
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RUUlE9nRBQ

  • RaiderEd

    People seem to forget that Mason actually stunk up the last 6 weeks of the previous season as well. After the All-Star break his 1st yr. he struggled and got worse and worse until the playoffs when he was literally worthless. He was in a zone when he started the seaosn with the Spurs, playing over his head. He’ll never get back there.

  • JimmyDean

    It’s okay. He’s a music producer or manager now. Yall didnt catch his girlfriend and artist at the Spurs playoff games singing? That’s his post-basketball career. He’ll land on his feet.

  • speakingofspurs

    We can’t blame Mason Jr for what happened to the Spurs this year. That just ain’t fair. It goes deeper than that. Start with management