The pressure mounts the longer it goes

by

Tim Duncan, Manu Ginobili, Antonio McDyess and DeJuan Blair sit on the bench during the Spurs Game 5 loss to DallasHere’s a riddle for you: lots of folks are saying that the San Antonio Spurs need to win Game 6 tonight in San Antonio and end the series, because if it goes to Game 7 in Dallas, all the pressure will be on the Spurs. But by saying that, aren’t they putting all that pressure on the Spurs to win tonight instead?

I’ll let you ponder that for a minute.

Either way you look at it, I’m sure all parties involved would like for this series to end tonight. Except for the Mavs, that is. I guess by all parties, I’m saying us, you and the Spurs.

One key to Game 6 for the Spurs is slowing down the Mavericks in transition. Jeff McDonald of the San Antonio Express-News had a good writeup on the pace of play today:

Amid the obvious physical battles of the series, which have resulted in four flagrant fouls and one broken nose (Ginobili’s), there has been a subtler philosophical battle raging as well. It is a tug-of-war over tempo.

If the game becomes three-yards-and-a-cloud-of-dust, a la Games 2, 3, and 4, the Spurs win. If it becomes a track meet, as in Games 1 and 5, the Mavs do.

“They’re very dangerous with their pace,” said Spurs coach Gregg Popovich, who even after the Game 5 loss is 24-9 in potential close-out games, the best mark in NBA history. “We’ve got to make sure we get back as best we can no matter whether we’re scoring or not.”

The Mavericks are 2-0 in the series when they notch at least 100 points, 0-3 when they do not. In the three losses, they have averaged 88.

The Spurs are great at controlling pace. That’s the main reason for San Antonio’s consistent success against the Phoenix Suns in previous years. So it’s probable that the Spurs can control the tempo and make it a defensive game, where Dallas has struggled in halfcourt offense this series.

Another area I suggest keeping an eye on is the play of Tim Duncan and Manu Ginobili. Both had bad performances in Games 4 and 5. Together, Manu and Duncan are a combined 10-41 in both of those games. No bueno.

At least one of them, if not both, will have to be sharp offensively for the Spurs to win tonight. Unless the dogs have the same impact they did in Game 4, but that’s something you simply can’t rely on.

The third thing to watch in tonight’s Game 6 is how the Spurs adjust to Brendan Haywood. After coming off the bench for the entire series, Haywood started Game 5 and produced to the tune of eight points, eight rebounds (six offensive) and four blocked shots, and the Mavs big man shot 12 free throws.

How the Spurs counter the impact of having Haywood on the floor from the start will have a significant impact on how this game goes. It seems the more Erick Dampier plays, the better San Antonio does. Attacking the basket, which the Spurs didn’t do a good job of in Game 5 outside of Tony Parker, can get Haywood in foul trouble early and get him out of the game. Easier said than done, I know, but nonetheless must be said.

The longer this series goes after the Spurs were up 3-1, the more the pressure increases for San Antonio. Whispers of choke will start if the silver and black lose tonight. And what the Spurs can use more than anything, is rest. Not only will a Game 7 mean another game, it means another flight to Dallas and another night in a hotel. The Spurs need to do themselves a favor; finish it tonight.

  • Tanjavur

    Yooooohooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Big relief. Phew!

    Parker, Hill & Dice hit some big shots down the stretch. I think the Spurs beat one of the best teams in the 2010 post season. Now I hope Portland beats Phoenix so we get some rest before the 2nd round.

    Go Spurs!

  • SAS

    YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH we did it man. Greeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatttttttttttttttt win. Can any body saw mark cuban face!

  • Trade Tp

    I do hate Matt Bonner. He blows and he is a liability for our team. Blair is more productive in half the time. GET IT HENDERSON?Bonner is barely over 30% FG and 3pt for the series. 16mpg is too many.

    Hill shot 50% FG and 3pt this series.

    McDyess played better than I expected. I hate the fact that he never takes it to the rim. 0 FT attepts this series…ODD….

    Tim= Horrible series. less than 50% FG less than 50% FT. Almost 3Tos a game. Yikes.

    Jefferson= Shot over 54% from the field, yet only took 37 shots.

    Manu= Shot poorly from three 30%. Aggressive play saved us.

    TP= Great comeback. Dont like him taking all the jumpers. 62% FT…..

    Players of series= Hill/Manu

  • td4life

    Revenge!
    What a run the Spurs have gone on down the season stretch… amazing! All you Pop-doubters need to give it up: Coach just tweaks and studies his lineups, and rests his vets, just waiting for the postseason- he’s one of the very best. (And I’m glad Peter Holt gets to make some money this post season, which can only help our cause over the next few seasons.)
    Still, I am still surprised the Mavs went out so early this year, bad luck getting SA in round one. Does anyone have the size and talent to stop LA?
    Meanwhile, I think round 2 will be a little easier for the Spurs. It’d sure would help if we can hit our effing free throws more consistently!
    Can’t wait!

  • Phoebus

    Trade TP:

    Seriously, if you want a job in the Spurs’ FO, angle for that.

    Until you get it, your synopsis of certain players having had “bad games” b/c of their fg percentage smacks of too much Hollinger truism.

    The rest of us are pretty sure that Pop knows how to run the Spurs.

  • wannabe_fan

    Impression of mavs fan: OOOH, the refs hate us…WAAHHH…the NBA doesn’t want us in the finals…WAAHHH…the Spurs play dirty…WAAHHH…our best players have no heart…WAAHHH…

    Go Spurs Go, bring on the Suns!

    We can’t sign Bowen and Horry for the next series, can we? How about bringing them back as “Special Asst. Coaches”? If a coach leaves the bench and gets suspended…oh well.

  • the wanderer

    Mavs are out, belying their number 2 seeding and exposing Cuban’s myopic team-building strategy. Portland or Phoenix is next, but I’m more worried about the sleeping giant in LA. Lakers haven’t played their best ball yet.

  • SAS

    WOW! What a great defence game.
    can any body noticed how we limited F***ing MAVS

    Game 6-87 Points——-Spurs Win
    Game 2-88 Points——Spurs Win
    Game 4-89 Points——Spurs Win
    Game 3-90 Points——Spurs Win

    What a great consistency in Defence.

    Once Again

    OFFENCE WIN GAMES BUT
    DEFENCE WIN CHAMPIONSHIPS

    GO SPURS GO!

  • Phoebus

    Fingers crossed for the blazers to win tonight and create as much rest as possible for us.

  • Andres

    Wow, great game. Lots of suffer. But we get the win!!!

    Bye, bye Mavs!

  • lvmainman

    Suns are a tougher matchup than Dallas because they have better shooters at every position. Kidd, Marion, Haywood were lousy shooters. Suns have Frye not Haywood, Hill not Marion, and Nash not Kidd. Suns shooters are way better and tougher to defend than the Mavs. We won’t be able to hold the Suns under 90 pts in 4 games. They also have Dragic, Barbosa, and Stoudamire. The Suns are loaded with more scorers than the Mavs.

    But it will be easier for us to score hopefully with Nash, Frye, Dudley as defenders. Duncan might have more success in the post if Lopez is still hurt. Plus the open court game benefits Jefferson, Hill, and Parker. But, Parker has a hard time being guarded by Grant Hill.

    The Suns are a way tougher matchup than the Mavs.

  • Trade Tp

    Phoebus- please explain, if you can, your previous comment addressed to me.

    Td4life- Pop won this game through coaching the previous game. Kudos

  • Phoebus

    Trade tp:

    no. listen to others, have fun while while we’re winning, stop being such a know-it-all dick.

  • Bushka

    The thing is.

    The most negative people on the forum have been the ones basically caning Pop and others non stop all season while some have been preaching a patient approach with a firm belief that the front office had a better grasp of wtf they were doing than anyone else.

    Now instead of just saying yeah they knew what they were doing, there is still this negative miasma over every comment.

    Ballhog with the entire pop bum sniffing thing he is into is a prime example of refusing to see the forest for the trees.

    The spurs are into round two after beating the 2nd seeded Mavs. Pop caned Rick Carlisle in a coach vs coach capacity while they did it.

    Why not just get with the programme and be freaking happy about it.

  • the wanderer

    Suns’ pick-and-roll game between Nash and Stoudamire will be one of Spurs’ biggest problems in the series, if it goes to that. Many of Stoudamire’s points in the regular season against the Spurs were from dives into the lane via Nash feeds. Clogging the lane opens up spots for shooters.

    In a nutshell, the series will pit the Suns’ high-risk, high-output offense (consisting of fastbreak and early offense points that tend to generate turnovers or hurried shots as well as low-percentage three-point shots out of pick-and-roll situations) against the Spurs’ inside-oriented, low-output offense achored on penetrations and post-ups.

    Spurs have a better chance on offense, percentage-wise, but their chances get even better if they continue to deliver the newfound D they exhibited in the first round.

  • the wanderer

    After posting the comment above, I checked the Suns-Blazers game (Suns appeared headed for a win as they had a 7 point lead with 2 minutes remaining) and guess what. Suns were shooting 50% from the three-point area even in the face of a hostile Portland crowd!

  • Pingback: San Antonio Spurs close out the Dallas Mavericks | 48 Minutes of Hell

  • Bushka

    We have the horses to beat Phoenix, so long as we do a good job of controlling the pace.

    I like our chances.

    It is one hell of a grudge match double feature though isn’t it?

    Dallas then Phoenix. Heh.

  • Trade Tp

    Sorry to make you look like an idiot Phoebus