3-on-3: Game 2 reactions

by

Visit our Spurs-Mavs Series Hub for all the content posted during the first round. You know what? Just go ahead and bookmark it.

As Spurs Land tries to come to grips with a tougher-than-expected first round series, Jason Gallagher from TrueHoop Network site Ballerball joins Matthew Tynan and me to discuss what’s happened so far and what’s up next in today’s 3-on-3.

1. How has your outlook on this series changed after two games?

3on3_truehoopnetwork_110
Matthew Tynan, 48 Minutes of Hell: Well, I picked a sweep. So… yeah. Really, I think the Spurs are fine. They played like garbage in Game 2 (and much of Game 1), but Carlisle’s usage of this “hide our worst defenders and switch on all pick-and-rolls” defense has absolutely been effective and made this series serious. This is going to be more difficult than I originally thought, but I’d be shocked if Dallas pulls it off.

Jason Gallagher, Ballerball: There is absolutely nothing bold about this, but it’s now looking like it could be an actual series as opposed to a blow-out. The Mavs have taken their discipline to a whole other level this series. Because of the lack of actual raw talent on this team, being concise and dedicated to Carlisle’s strategy is the only way in hell that Dallas has a shot at competing in this thing. Whether it’s sticking to their defensive schemes or being disciplined in their shot selection, Carlisle has these guys locked in and looking like the better squad.

Andrew McNeill, 48 Minutes of Hell: Pretty much this:

Really, I don’t think even the homer-est of Mavs fans saw this coming. That said, as one of our astute commenters pointed out in a recent post, we saw a similar first two games of a series in San Antonio’s second round matchup last year with Golden State. I get that the Warriors and Mavericks are two completely different teams, but San Antonio’s reaction to the beginning of each series was about the same. But San Antonio made their adjustments and controlled the rest of the series. I think we’ll see something similar with this series, it’s just going to be tougher for the Spurs than expected. That said, Rick Carlisle is a different beast than Mark Jackson.

2. How long can Tiago Splitter continue to limit Dirk Nowitzki’s offense?

Tynan: I don’t see any reason why it’s going to be much different. Splitter has been very effective, and this version of Dirk lacks the foot speed to get by opponents consistently on the dribble-drive and off pump-fakes. Unless Dallas starts to introduce some new offensive wrinkles for Dirk in pick-and-pop situations, it’s hard to imagine he’ll just go off consistently against San Antonio’s defense. Then again, it’s Dirk we’re talking about.

Gallagher: This does sort of feel like a ticking time bomb, doesn’t it? Tiago is doing about as good a job on Dirk as I’ve seen all season, but I think Dirk is due for one of his patented “good defense, better offense” type of games. Charles Barkley said it after game two; when you’re older you can’t dominate an entire series, but you can certainly have a couple dominant games. I think we’ll see Dirk dominate at least one of these games on his home floor.

McNeill: I can’t imagine for much longer. Splitter is doing an excellent job staying close to Dirk and bodying him up without fouling, but Dirk is still a elite player with a high release and excellent mechanics. The shots will start falling soon. Luckily for the Mavs, Nowitzki isn’t killing Dallas when he’s on the floor as a result of his lack of offensive production. Dirk’s net rating is +8.7 points per 100 possessions so far in this series, which is about double his regular season average.

3. Will Game 3 be a bounce-back game for Kawhi Leonard and, if so, what will that look like?

Tynan: It has to be. I’d put my money on him producing better than six points and five rebounds, and really, he’s due. We’ve seen what he’s capable of doing against Dallas, and he’s got to turn up the aggressiveness about 10 notches to get himself going. The Spurs don’t necessarily need him to score systematically in half-court sets; they need him to bring the game-changing chaos that makes him so unique.

Gallagher: Absolutely. Game 2 was a turd in the rough for Kawhi due to that silly foul trouble he got himself into. I have too much faith in him and Pop to think that Kawhi will duplicate this in Game 3. The Mavs are practically daring anyone but Tim Duncan and Tony Parker to take over on the offensive end, and I think Gregg Popovich finds a way to get Kawhi going. On the other end, he’ll be far more disciplined and be back to his defensively dominate self.

McNeill: I think you have to expect Leonard to be a lot better in Game 3. [Thanks, Captain Obvious.] Foul trouble played a huge role in Leonard’s disastrous Game 2, which is something that doesn’t typically happen. Leonard only racked up four or more fouls eight times in the regular season. San Antonio will need Leonard to post up plenty in Game 3, especially if Dallas continues to match-up Monta Ellis on Kawhi. Watch out for Monta trying to draw the charge on Leonard down low, though. Leonard creates a lot of contact when backing Ellis down, and the opportunity seems too great not to give it a shot. As far as what a bounce-back game looks like, I think it’s something in the 15-18 point range with the threat for double-digit rebounds. The key is how much chaos he can create defensively. If he can get a couple of steals for easy baskets, well, that’s the type of stuff opposing teams can’t plan for.

  • brunostrange

    hey, Gallagher, it’s “dominant.” You’re welcome.

  • Dapimp Ofdayear

    A few points:

    1. Watching the OKC-Memphis series, I’m glad the Spurs, with the way they’re playing right now, avoided Memphis.

    2. The comparisons to the GSW series last year are apt, but the Spurs had already swept a playoff series by then. And honestly, they didn’t gain control of the GSW series until they ratcheted up their team defense several notches, which is exactly what they must do here.

    3. I love the suggested strategy of Kawhi working Monta Ellis over in the post. We really need to wear down these Mavs guards however we can, which should negatively affect the percentages of the mid-range jumpers they have feasted on so far.

  • Graham

    That Lakers series wasn’t a real playoff series, If anything it did more harm than good since we basically sleepwalked through it.

    Agree on the physically punishing the mavs guards for the switching part, but some credence to starting Manu or Marco and having Green come off the bench should be there. Having Green shadow Vince or Harris is a good idea, and having a second ball handler to force more mismatches has got to be an interesting idea. Still, maybe we should save tinkering with lineups for later. Lazy turnovers was a HUGE part of why we lost, considering how well we shot from the field.

  • Dapimp Ofdayear

    Yeah, you know the more I think about it, the Spurs just need to shift gears and play with some amped up intensity on both ends. It’s like they’re still at the end of the regular season, mentally. Once they come out with some fire, desperation, and as they call it, “appropriate fear,” (as opposed to mere lip-service) I think we’ll begin to see that they are simply the better team.

  • Chris Massara

    We still can’t figure out 2014 of Harris just like 2006 version; how about having Marcu start and Green on the bench with Manu so he can guard Harris?

  • Pingback: A look ahead at Game 3: Spurs need to get in gear