Spurs Offseason Guide, Part 2: The Danny Green Conundrum and What to Do With Tiago Splitter

by

Here’s the problem with finding a scrap-heap guy and helping him transform into star role player: What was once a cheap contract with gigantic value can quickly become a luxury item that’s played its way out of your price range.

Danny Green’s ascension from the Fred Astaire of the Cleveland Cavaliers’ dancing bench mob to the ranks of the league’s best 3-and-D perimeter players has arguably been one of the most enjoyable reclamation stories in recent years, and it’s played a major part in San Antonio’s enormous success during that time.

Now, he’s about to get paid. Fortunately for the Spurs, his cap-hold situation is very similar to Kawhi Leonard’s, and what’s sure to be a contract pushing eight figures (if not leapfrogging the $10-million range) can be put off until the Spurs have handled other business.

But unlike Leonard, Green is not a restricted free agent, which means the Spurs will not have the right of first refusal. And trust me, he’s going to get a ton of attention. His defensive chops and ability to spread the floor are super valuable in today’s NBA, and while he may fit the Spurs’ system more efficiently than others, his skill sets translate pretty well regardless of style of play.

Make no mistake about it: If the Spurs lose Green, it could be a major loss should they not be able to fill the void with comparable talent.

The league has become a perimeter playground, where rostering two elite defensive players has become damn near a necessity against the likes of Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook, Steph Curry and Klay Thompson, LeBron James and Kyrie Irving — the list goes on. This is one of the primary reasons for San Antonio’s success since Leonard and Green became the full-time starters at the small forward and shooting guard positions, respectively.

Rarely do you have two interchangeable defensive parts on the perimeter that offers very little drop-off from one player to the next. The Spurs are able to switch liberally in transition defense, eliminating the risk of getting crossed up in an effort to locate an assignment; and on top of that, they’re able to give different looks to offensive players if a sharpshooter is getting too comfortable or a rim-attacker is creating foul trouble.

There is no perfect metric for measuring value in two-man lineups, but the duo of Green and Leonard sit atop or near the top of Spurs’ lineups in both defensive rating and net rating, and is right in there among the elite units in the NBA. Outside of all those pesky combinations the Warriors can unleash on teams, it’s tough to argue for a better defensive duo than the one in San Antonio.

So now the Spurs find themselves between a rock and a hard place. There is absolutely mutual interest between Green and the team, but this is the guard’s best chance at a big payday and a chance to truly secure his future — can’t fault the guy for that. Unless the team finds a way to shed some salary, an eight-figure deal is going to be difficult to shell out, even if Green is patient enough to let San Antonio handle its business before exercising their Bird rights to go over the cap.

Here’s the other thing: Without knowing the futures of Duncan and Ginobili at the moment, it’s difficult to get a real visual of San Antonio’s payroll situation. But, in all likelihood, the team would have to renounce the salaries of Marco Belinelli, Cory Joseph, Aron Baynes, Jeff Ayres, Matt Bonner and Reggie Williams (or most of them, at least) to give itself a legitimate shot to re-sign Green while still allowing for flexibility in the free-agent market.

But that involves a pretty substantial gutting of the roster, and while Pop alluded to a summer of change, it’s tough to imagine major turnover being the best course of action should Duncan want to make one last run. Would taking chances in free agency be worth the risk of sacrificing roster continuity?

Green and Leonard could cost San Antonio as much as $26 million or more this offseason, which would almost assure them of luxury-tax flirtation and a date with the dreaded cap “apron.”

Unless…

Trading Tiago Splitter

Built on the already-powerful foundation of anti-Splitter-ists, the “Trade Tiago” fan club has gained quite a bit of steam in recent weeks. Splitter underperformed this season, mostly due to injuries, and his inability to play extended minutes against a brutal Clippers front line really hurt the Spurs in early May.

Tiago’s value to this team has already been proven, but for some reason there remains a need to reiterate the point: When Splitter is healthy, San Antonio is a monster.

There is no coincidence the Spurs’ best run of the season came with their starting center’s return to the starting lineup. During that time they were decimating opponents by more than 15 points per 100 possessions, while the starting lineup was drubbing its counterparts by a net rating of 30.3 in 200 minutes on the floor together during that time — absolute murder-ball.

More specifically, it’s the pressure he takes off Duncan that makes the biggest difference. The old man no longer has to deal with the NBA’s inside brutes at a weight at least 20 pounds lighter than he carried around during his early years in the league. He’s now able to move more freely from the weak side defensively, saving energy for the offensive end and saving his knees for the postseason, where he has more responsibility.

During the regular season, Splitter took on 20 percent of the opposition’s post-ups while he was on the floor, allowing just .63 points per possession. That’s the second-best mark in the league among big men, just behind Blake Griffin, per Synergy. On the flip side of that, Duncan gave up .94 points per possession on post-ups, a number that sits down in the NBA’s 31st percentile.

And this isn’t an indictment of Duncan. His weight loss several years ago gave new life to his aging game on both sides of the ball, but it’s a physical chore going up against the likes of Boogie Cousins, Blake Griffin, Dwight Howard, and all the other basketball behemoths that league throws at you on a night-to-night basis.

Splitter isn’t just a big body thrown into the scrum to take a beating, either. He’s skilled and physical in fighting for position both before and after the catch, and despite is lack of vertical athleticism, he’s very good at defending the rim without fouling. He’s versatile, too, ranging out to defend the Aldridges and Nowitzkis of the world and rooting his legs on the block against the post-up giants.

And while his back-to-the-basket offensive game is often cringeworthy, featuring an array of shots that sometimes flail like a beachball in the wind, he’s a great pick-and-roll player with excellent touch and quick instincts when he catches the ball in 4-on-3 and 3-on-2 situations. He’s a really good basketball player who’s important to what the Spurs want to do, but I’ve gone on far too long about this — I digress.

While the prospect of losing Splitter concerns me as it relates to Duncan’s longterm health over the course of a season, the idea of letting Green walk is something I find quite a bit more worrisome, especially with Tiago’s injury issues over the years. The NBA has gone small, and while there’s still huge value in size and front-court depth, deploying a center-center combination up front (which is basically what the Spurs have when Duncan and Splitter share the court) is quickly becoming dangerous against a league that’s firing 3s from four and even five positions on the floor.

And San Antonio has shown the damage it can do with Boris Diaw at the four. He’s got range all the way to the 3-point line on both sides of the ball, and still maintains the healthy figure to deal with some bumping and grinding on the block.

Most importantly, finding a way to unload Splitter’s $8.5 million salary on a team that could absorb it and get a $0 return — hey there, Atlanta Hawks and Coach Bud! — would open up a lot of possibilities for San Antonio in free agency. It could then mess around on the open market and still look to bring back some of its own, more inexpensive free agents. Not to mention, moving Tiago would also create an extra cushion that would make re-signing both Leonard and Green more of a possibility.

I really hate saying it, but this might be the way to go. Splitter is very valuable, but he’s not indispensable; and if the Spurs can find a way to replace his cap hit with more length and athleticism on the perimeter and still find a way to bring in another big body, it’s probably for the best.

It won’t be easy. Unloading contracts, even when attached to useful players, is a difficult task without attaching picks and/or prospects in the deal, and it may take multiple teams to get it done. San Antonio has been very careful with its picks and doesn’t owe anything to anybody at this point, so there may be possibilities there.

Regardless, if this team is to look “considerably different” next season, moving Splitter would be a major step in that direction.


  • Bobby Long

    I think the question that most people wonder is what is the possibility of signing Green, Leonard and Aldridge/Gasol type? Tim Duncan has already taken pay cuts throughout his career, I doubt he will do it again, especially after news about losing the 20 million to his financial advisor.

  • Tyler Spears

    I agree with trading Splitter. By no means do I dislike him- our last championship was assisted by his defensive versatility- but I’d rather lose him than Green. Plus, our draft spot has a lot of quality prospect bigs, which makes trading away Tiago even more bearable.

  • patrick

    The problem I see with trading Splitter to sign LMA is the impact once Duncan leaves. A Splitter/LMA front line would make a lot of sense, but where do the Spurs go if it’s just LMA holding down the front court in the post-Duncan years?

  • skeptic210

    $52M/ 4 years for Green. With the cap going to $90M, $13M per is more like $9M today, so everyone needs to reset their minds around the new cap.

    I wouldnt be surprised to see someone offer him $60M/4 and it will be tough to sign him for that, but I probably would.

  • DorieStreet

    Keep Green.
    If there is a team wanting Splitter- do the deal.

  • Graham

    Honestly? Almost non existent from what I understand. Too much money between the 4 that you lost without turning the bench into a complete joke in my opinion

  • Graham

    I’d just as soon hold on to Splitter, focus on retaining Green and Leonard, and get Duncan back for two more years and fill in the pieces around them for next year. We should maybe think about making a play at Horford this following year, for example.

    If we can find a good Splitter facsimile then I would be open to trading him, but I’m skeptical that any replacements wouldn’t be fool’s gold.

    We need to be patient and focus on keeping our proven talent while hunting for optimal additions rather than rolling the dice that could set us up for a Lakers style disaster.

  • Graham

    Yes, honestly he’s worth that with the cap jump. I really feel focusing our cap on retaining our key guys should be the priority at this juncture.

  • TD BestEVER

    Yes, trade Splitter. We proved this year in the regular season that he is easily replaced by Baynes. And in the playoffs, if POP had benched him for Diaw we would have won that as well.

    Add all this with the report that LMA isn’t resigning with Portland and you have your recipe for success.

    TD - 7 million with some money next year or the year after he retires
    LMA 18 - or whatever the MAX is for him
    Green at 10 - You can back load it a bit start off at 9 and end at 11 or so.
    Baynes 3 mill
    Then a bunch of draft guys to fill in the spots. even if we trade out of the 1st round to a couple early 2nd round players we should be ok. I know Houston wants to get another late 1st rd pick. We can realitically make a run at LMA/Gasol and keep Green if we trade Splitter.

  • RawJa777

    Except we were a shell of our former selves with Baynes and got eliminated when he was asked to handle Splitter’s minutes in the playoffs (which he couldn’t do and ultimately rode the bench). When Tiago played and was healthy, we won the championship and rolled through the best in the league, including the Champion GSW, at the end of this season. We ONLY played well when Splitter was healthy. Also, LMA doesn’t replace Splitter. He replaces Diaw. Let’s all realize this now.

  • RawJa777

    My bad, Splitter didn’t play in that game vs Golden State. Point is still valid though, we were a MUCH better team with him in the lineup. As far as his recent injury history, you know who else has missed quite a bit of time in the last two years? Kawhi Leonard. Let’s not trade him either.

  • TD BestEVER

    Problem is we could have won with Diaw in the game starting instead of Splitter. And we have won 65% of our games with Tiago out of the line up the last couple years. So yeah we play well with him but just as well w/o and those numbers don’t lie. And We don’t need to replace Splitter. LMA/Duncan>Splitter/Duncan all day and tomorrow. The only thing you need Splitter for are mobile bigs, and with LMA/Diaw we should have that covered.

  • TD BestEVER

    But our record w/o KL was just above .500 and we won about 70% of our games this year w/o Tiago. So yeah those 2 aren’t close.

  • brunostrange

    If I were betting, I’d wager Splitter is gone before the end of July. With the news that Aldridge is almost certainly not returning to Portland, it seems SA has as good a chance (if not an advantage) of landing him as anyone (I’d prefer Gasol, but I don’t think he’s leaving MEM). Any way you cut it, making such a deal entails unloading Tiago. He’s been a great value to the team, but them’s the breaks.

  • DorieStreet

    I wish Tiago would/could have come over the summer he was drafted (2007). At least one of those titles the next 5 seasons (2008-12; most likely ’08) would have gone the Spurs’ way).
    Seems to me that Aldridge is attempting to throw a bone to POR….letting his team know the day of the draft he’s gone.

  • Ryan McShane

    If you’re getting LaMarcus Aldridge, wouldn’t you want to trade away Diaw? I feel like their skill sets are most similar (considering we did not see point forward Diaw this year). Splitter would be better traded away if Gasol or Jordan found their way here.

    I can’t wait for the draft and the first few weeks of free agency. This roster is a blank canvas, and Popovich Picasso is about to go to work.

  • brunostrange

    I’d still trade Splitter. For starters, Splitter’s contract is a bit of a drag on SA. I don’t think getting rid of Diaw, while keeping Splitter, frees up enough cash to land LMA unless you really go about gutting the rest of the roster. Second, with the trend toward small ball, Diaw is a much better alternative on the court than Splitter. Unless your opponent has a dominant big, Diaw is a better option (and if the Spurs are to return to the finals, they’re going to have to get past OKC and GS, against whom Diaw is the better match-up)

  • Jezav

    The problem with trading Splitter is not so much that it leaves the Spurs thin at center (which it does), but that I think it makes it less likely that Aldridge would want to come to the Spurs. If Aldridge comes he is going to want someone next to him who is going to take the pounding of matching up against other centers. That is not a good role for Duncan at this stage of his career, and the Baynger, though he has improved, would not be the answer at a starters level of minutes. Aldridge is going to want Splitter (or another good center, through that would cost more than just keeping Splitter, and Splitter has proven awesome as the kind of center Aldridge would want to play beside). Trading Splitter would make SA less appealing to Aldridge

    Also, I just saw the report on ESPN about the Spurs thinking that Duncan will come back and it mentions that they rebuffed several trade offers for Splitter. That may be because the offers were crappy, but it also might be because they know that they need two bangers to play next to both Duncan and Aldridge if he comes. I think Danny is the one who might be the casualty. If we could keep both Splitter and Green while adding Aldridge (along with Kawhi of course), the Spurs might be the best team next year assuming that team chemistry cooperates and key players stay relatively healthy. As it was, my (maybe biased opinion) is that the stretch of basketball the Spurs played when Splitter re-entered the starting lineup until he got re-injured may have been the best stretch by ANY team at any point last year, which made it all the more disappointing when the injuries came into play at the end of the season. That team was a juggernaut :-(

  • Dapimp Ofdayear

    When discussing (correctly, I might add) Splitter’s value against the playoff Mavs, Grizz, and Blazers, it must also be mentioned that he was borderline unplayable against the likes of OKC and Miami.