Advanced Scouting: Chicago Bulls at San Antonio Spurs

by

I am going to try my hand at creating game previews including statistical details and game plans for potential areas of focus for the Spurs. I can’t promise anything, but if you have anything else you want to see, let me know.

Chicago Bulls at San Antonio Spurs 8:30 CST November 17, 2010

SRS ranks:

Chicago: 3.51 (9th)
San Antonio: 7.07 (4th)

Key Player Statistics (courtesy of 82games.com (effective November 11, 2010) and basketballvalue.com:

Chicago Bulls Player Ratings

PlayerPercentage of teams minutesPER minus Counterpart PERLast Year Net PEROff court +/-per 48 minutesOff court +/-per 48 minutes2 Year Adjusted +/-
Noah0.8282.36-28.1-1.17
Gibson0.6210.7-3.33.7-64.43
Bogans0.52-4.4-6.614.6-15.6-1.75
Rose0.77-3.55.72.3-7.9-3.99
Deng0.763.24.6-1.75.44.59
Watson0.231.4-2.1-8.62.52.51
Asik0.29-12.6N/A1.1-0.5N/A
Korver0.41-9.81.7-1.61.12.56
Brewer0.251.30.5-26.48.7-6.53

Spurs castaway Keith Bogans has played significant minutes for the Bulls up to this point in the season. It’s interesting that the Bulls have performed drastically better with him on the floor this year, but it’s important to remember that we are only 9 games into the season and on-court/off-court numbers tend to be very inconsistent.

Most valuable lineup:

K. Bogans, L. Deng, J. Noah, D. Rose, T. Gibson +59 in 136 Minutes

Preferred method to create shots: Pick and Roll

Last year the Bulls relied heavily on the Derrick Rose running the pick and roll, and with good success. The Bulls scored 98 points per 100 pick and roll possessions that started with Rose handling the ball. This ranked in the 71st percentile for NBA teams.

In the offseason, the Bulls made significant offensive acquisitions in Carlos Boozer and Kyle Korver. They have more efficient scoring options than last year, especially once Boozer makes his return/debut, but Rose will likely remain the offensive catalyst. This article illustrates one of the Bulls changes in offensive focus.

Appropriate Spurs counter: George Hill and defensive help on drives

George Hill and Tony Parker were the primary defenders of Derrick Rose last year. George Hill is likely the best matchup against Derrick Rose, but few, if any, players are capable of effectively staying in front of this athletic freak. Limiting his effectiveness will take smart defensive help. Although Rose’s assist totals are up this year, his turnovers have also increased and his assists tend to be less valuable than other all-star point guards. Assists on close shots and dunks are significantly more valuable than assists on jump shots. This year, about 31% of Rose’s assists are on close shots. By comparison, about 52% of Steve Nash’s assists are on close shots. Double teaming Rose can often result in turnovers and when it doesn’t; Rose’s passes aren’t among the most lethal you will find (but it should go without saying that Korver’s defender should not be quick to help).

Usually, a smart game plan against someone with Rose’s explosiveness is to entice them to shoot jump shots. However, despite Rose’s career three point percentage of under 25% and his mediocre free throw rate, he was very successful on 2 point jumpers last year (compared to the rest of the league) at nearly 47%. Despite this, I would prefer nearly any opponent not named Derek Fisher to take more two point jump shots than close shots.

Defensive Weakness: Exploit Luol Deng on the pick and roll

After helping turn around the Celtics defensive performance, many expect(ed) the Bulls to show vast improvements defending the rim in 2011. Thus far, the Bulls have climbed to 7th in the NBA in defensive rating after ranking 11th last year. (A side note relating to the link, the Bulls ranked right around average in defending pick and roll ball handlers in 2010.)

Luol Deng has been a very good isolation perimeter defender over the last couple years. His opponents rates of 0.73 and 0.84 points per possession ranked in the 83rd and 56th percentiles in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Despite his success in one of the NBA’s most significant and high profile situations, Deng has struggled against the pick and roll, allowing 0.95 and 0.92 points per possession and ranking in the 10th and 36th percentiles in 2009 and 2010.

In 2010, Deng predominantly defended Richard Jefferson, Manu Ginobili and Tony Parker. The Spurs can exploit Deng’s weakness by running Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili off of pick and rolls when he is matched up against them. When the Bulls use Deng to defend RJ, isolation plays for Ginobili and Parker become more enticing.

Conclusion

The Spurs have enjoyed a sterling start to their season. Coming off of 2 days rest, they have a very good opportunity to continue their winning ways when the Bulls come to town.

Other things to watch for

*The Spurs are running more this season than in previous seasons. This season, San Antonio ranks fourth in the NBA with 19.8 fastbreak points per game.
San Antonio Spurs
Last 5 Years
FB PPG NBA Rank
2010-11 19.8 4
2009-10 12.5 23
2008-09 9.4 28
2007-08 9.5 24
2006-07 11.6 19
(information courtesy of NBA Statistics and Information Research)

*The Spurs can tie the team record if they win for the 9th time in 10 games. The last time the Spurs won 9 of their first 10 games was in 1982. That team finished 48-34 before being eliminated in the second round by the LA Lakers.

*Tim Duncan will tie the David Robinson as the all time Spurs record for games played tonight. Duncan is off to a slow start, but is within 38 points away from breaking David Robinson’s the Spurs NBA scoring record. With 20,762 career points, he still has some work to catch George Gervin’s ABA/NBA franchise mark of 23,602.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Spurs Stats | Advanced Scouting | Chicago Bulls 11/17/2010 | 48 Minutes of Hell -- Topsy.com()

  • dingo

    Bulls looked good last night v Houston, hopefully they will be tired and with our 2 days off can get an early lead.

    I’ll also be interested in the rebounding match between Noah and Duncan/Blair. And if Tony/Hill can do anything to stop Rose.

    Since I live in Chicago this will be on TV, pretty excited, Go Spurs!

  • Greyberger

    Great preview Scott. Bulls are a strange beast this time of year. They’re relying on that starting lineup to keep them in games; it accounts for 35% of their total playing time. When you remove that lineup from the accounting they’re a below-average team.

    We can be pretty sure they trot out that lineup three times tonight regardless of who the Spurs send out. We should definitely capitalize on their weak bench when they’re resting Noah or Rose.

    Both starter groups are scoring very well to start the season. Bulls starters are at 117.9 and Spurs at 122.7 points per 100 poss. Either this will be a wildly high scoring game or we’ll see some regression to the mean in action.

    Spurs are fifth in pace right now, Chicago is tenth. When we played the running gunning Rockets there were 110 possessions in the game. That was more than any regular season game last year; even the Warriors games where we scored 118 and 147 only went up to 106 possessions. We really are in uncharted territory with this team’s willingness to run.

  • bduran

    “They’re relying on that starting lineup to keep them in games; it accounts for 35% of their total playing time. When you remove that lineup from the accounting they’re a below-average team. ”

    Is this unusual? Glancing at 82games.com it looks like the minutes for their top 5 are in line with everyone elses. You’ve got Rose, Deng, and Noah getting 37-38 minutes and Bogans and Gibson getting sub 30. Doesn’t seem too outlandish. Also, if you removed the starting lineup from most teams they’d be below average, unless you only meant to compare bench’s.

  • Greyberger

    Doing some quick math, I found only the Lakers and Hornets have a starting five that plays more often than the Bulls (by percentage). The Lakers’ starters played 42% of their teams total minutes and of course crush all competition during these times. The Hornets are also at 35% and a number of other teams are in the low thirties; median is probably 26 or 28%.

    On the other side, injuries and non-competitive games has the Rockets as the team with the least dominant squad, only 6% of their lineups’ minutes went to the most played group.

    Not every team has a starting lineup that contributes positive numbers, or is relied on as heavily as Chicago’s is. With the Spurs starters in the picture, we’re 7.85 points better than average per 100 possessions. With their minutes removed we’re still 4.18 above average.

    Chicago by contrast is +4.5 per 100 poss. better with the starters accounted and -4.4 without.

    Their starter groups’ efficiency numbers are 117.9 on offense, 95.4 on defense.

    Every other Bulls lineup is 103.1 on offense, 107.5 on D.

    The Pistons are a good example of a team whose most played unit gets routinely beaten by competition and thus looks better WITHOUT them in the picture. The Warriors might be the team who needs the production of their best unit the most.

  • Greyberger

    I used basketballvalue.com for lineup and team total data (some games from last night might still be missing).

  • ap

    where do you find the data regarding players points allowed per possession for pick and roll situation?

    thanks.

  • Drom John

    One vote for making this a permament feature.

  • No, Ginobili!

    That’s two votes…

  • bduran

    Thanks Greyberger, that’s good stuff.

  • Greyberger

    ‘Course after I hype how often and well the Rose-Bogans-Deng-Gibson-Noah lineup plays, they only play 11 minutes last night vs. the Rockets and got beat when they were out there.

    Instead in the fourth they had a 18-0 run with Rose-Brewer-Korver-Deng-Asik. I bet we see that lineup, or a similar one with Noah in at some point tonight.

  • AP

    Permanent feature please. Fantastic post Scott!

  • http://www.48minutesofhell.com Scott Sereday

    Thanks for the comments.

    Much data for pick and roll, isolation, post, etc possessions for offense and defense if available at http://mysynergysports.com/