The Change of Balance in Star-Driven San Antonio

by

SAN ANTONIO — Danny Green dribbled down the left side of the floor with 2:28 remaining in the second quarter, sizing up the Clippers’ transition defense as Kawhi Leonard ran the opposite wing.

“I was gonna shoot it,” Green said of the play, before J.J. Redick stepped up to contest a potential launch from the 3-point line.

Good thing he didn’t.

Green reacted with a two-handed flip toward the basket, over Redick’s head and past a trailing Blake Griffin that appeared as if it might sail toward the end of the Spurs’ bench. San Antonio’s shooting guard said his thought process was twofold: Either he’d look bad and earn a spot on the bench next to an angry Gregg Popovich, or Leonard was going to catch it.

Kawhi caught it, and suddenly it felt as if a bomb had gone off inside the AT&T Center.

The reigning Finals MVP took flight, grabbed the ball out of the air with one giant mitt cocked back five feet from the basket, and tomahawked the ball through the hoop. A dead ball occurred soon thereafter, and the jumbotron above replayed the damage. The crowd in attendance reacted in unison, with an audible BOOM as each replay of the Leonard throw-down was looped.

Leonard’s alley-oop slam put the Spurs up 41-33, but it was only the beginning of the onslaught, and a career night for the newly minted Defensive Player of the Year.

San Antonio would outscore Los Angeles — the NBA’s most efficient offensive team during the regular season — 48-22 over the next 21 minutes, eventually pushing its lead to a staggering 37 points halfway through the fourth on its way to a 100-73 Game 2 win and a 2-1 lead in the opening-round series. It was the Clippers’ lowest point total of the season, and the franchise’s lowest playoff point total ever. Leonard, on the other hand, finished with a career high 32 points to leave yet another indelible mark on his postseason résumé.

“I just think it was one of those nights — it happens in the NBA,” Gregg Popovich said at the podium after the game. “We had a great shooting night, we had a lot of energy and we shot well. They had a difficult night shooting and it’s a bad combination, so they get a loss.

“We’ve been in the same situation before where we couldn’t throw it in the ocean and the other team shoots well so the loss is big. We’re not that good and they’re not what you saw tonight, without a doubt,” he continued. ” We just had one heck of a night.”

Calling it “one of those nights” is an appropriate way to describe what happened, but it was spectacular nonetheless. The Spurs looked like the playoff monsters that ripped through the 2014 Finals, suffocating a great offensive team with smothering defense, and landing haymaker after haymaker from all over the court on the other end.

The Clippers looked tired, a step slow on their rotations, and frankly, overwhelmed. The Spurs were making them pay for all of it.

“I don’t know about effort and execution, I just know we got our butts kicked. They played terrific basketball and we didn’t,” Doc Rivers said. “We have had a couple times this year … where we lose our spirit because we can’t make shots. That is what I thought happened as the game went on — every time we missed a shot we played less defense.”

At the end of the evening, the final box score led you to believe the Spurs were back for good — the same old group with the same wild style that kills you with long-range sniper fire, back-cutters slicing through exposed weak points, a deep and spread-out attack, and the brilliance of their Hall-of-Famers.

But it wasn’t the same. A look at the point totals told a different story, a new story. Leonard’s 32 points led the team, and only two other Spurs finished in double figures: Green — who freaking hounded Chris Paul on the defensive end — had 11, and Boris Diaw posted 15 on the night. Tim Duncan, Manu Ginobili, and Tony Parker had 12 combined.

Nothing felt top-heavy, though. Nothing felt forced, or desperate, or questionable. Leonard began to do whatever he liked, and the Clippers found themselves unable to provide any adequate response. For the Spurs, anything extra was gravy, because they had the best player on the floor.

San Antonio has moved away from post-up situations involving Kawhi, nearly eliminating Rivers’ ability to summon double-teams that disorganize his thought process. Instead, he’s primarily beating people off the dribble going outside-in, and he’s filling it up.

Leonard will pull-up, catch and shoot, or drive to the basket, and he’s become an efficient threat in all three facets.

“What didn’t he do (Friday)?” Matt Barnes, Leonard’s primary defender, asked in the Clippers’ locker room. “He guarded all of our best players, he made all of his shots. He had a great game tonight. He led their team and he killed us, and I have to do a better job on him.”

There was a discussion that arose among media members close to the both of the teams: If the Clippers called the Spurs tomorrow and offered Griffin for Leonard, what would San Antonio do? My answer, and the answer of others covering this team, was a very quick no.

We’ve arrived at the point where Leonard has become one of the NBA’s most valuable players in an age where perimeter athletes rule the landscape. He can defend all of them, and he can go for 32 points on 13-of-18 shooting. Make no mistake, Blake is a top-10 player, but Kawhi is an extreme rarity.

The quiet 23-year old leaves crowds frenzied, but shows little emotion in doing so. On Friday prior to the game, he was presented with the Defensive Player of the Year trophy by Tim Duncan, who tried to gauge what the young phenom was thinking during the heaping of public attention.

“Can anybody tell? I don’t know. I gave him the trophy, walked off and he was behind me,” Tim Duncan said. “He’s still maturing and I think obviously he is honored by it. He puts the effort in.

“I don’t know if he came out here tonight to say he is more than just a defender — he put on a show.”


 

I asked Green if he’d ever gotten a chance to see the replay of his lob to Leonard. He said he hadn’t, but the bench noticed the reactions from the crowd. BOOM, he remembered hearing over and over.

The beauty of the Internet and Twitter is there is no shortage of replays when incredible feats takeover a timeline. I turned my phone toward Green, and pressed play.

“That’s pretty cool,” he said, satisfied with his long-armed teammate on the receiving end of his pass.

More than only that play, though, the game itself was a statement — that the young nucleus of this team has never been better, and that life will be hell for any of the Western Conference’s premier wing tandems.

That the Spurs have only just begun to find their groove.

  • Dapimp Ofdayear

    A lot went on this game, most of it positive for the Spurs. But to me, the biggest harbinger of good fortune for the Spurs going forward was this: Danny Green forcing CP3 left, and pestering him into a rough night overall. If they can defend Chris Paul that well going forward, it won’t matter what Blake does, or in whose arena they play; The Clips won’t win another game.

  • Kristian Holvoet

    I’ll admit I was wrong. I thought Kawhi’s upside was a Discount Scotty Pippen (way better than Poor Man’s, but not quite the value of the original). Pippin was an all time great, one of the 50 best players and, arguably, the best wing defender of his generation (even though Jordan got the DPoY and Pip didn’t). Now? Pippen 2.0 looks possible. Slightly different offensive games - Kawhi is stronger and a better rebounder, while Pip was a very good Power Point / Point Forward. Kawhi looks like he shoots better, while Pip was a better ball handler.

    And Kawhi is DPoY whose best CAREER offensive games come in the playoffs. Some against LeBron. Early in the season, with the injuries, and before the rapid revealing of his offense over the last 3 months, I wondered if his durability and lack of highlight offense would hurt his value in the free agent market. Oops. First, note I said revealing. He has been developing well, and probably has turned a tipping point where he went from competent to well above average to (at times) dominant. Then he broke JJ Redick’s ankles, Ooped by Blake and suddenly he is Sports Center worthy for more than a steal or two (though last season’s block of Westbrook and pull-up 3 should have been all-timer and would have been if Jordan or Kobe had done it in a playoff).

    Most of the league (all the rest?) must be hating the Spurs for pulling this out of a very rough diamond.

  • GlassofOrangeJuice

    Game one was just a fluke. The clippers have awakened the monster that the rest of the NBA fears, and what gives Steve Kerr nightmares

  • Kristian Holvoet

    What about Houston? They just gave up 128 points to Dallas, w/o Parsons (or Rondo, but that may be addition by subtraction). Who is going to guard Kawhi? or Green? If we go by LAC series, they can handle a start PG and dominant, athletic big (actually, 2 bigs in Blake and DeAndre). The Houston bench is a lot better than the LAC (duh). But is Harden that much better then Paul (certainly not on defense), where DeAndre/Blake is 1.5 x offensive threats + 1.2 x defense of Dwight + Josh Smith? The LAC starting 5 is better balanced, offensively and not much worse than them defensively. And Harden will have to play 42+ minutes, so a better bench isn’t really going to help him much.

  • brunostrange

    Wow, the defense! So much to say about that game, but when we defend like that, we’re not gonna lose many.

  • Matthew Swenson

    Another impressive night. Leonard’s quiet demeanor, willingness to play within the team, and his All-Star teammates all obscure the fact that he is the best player on the team.

  • fkj74

    Great game for the our guys. I agree that a major key was Green’s D on Paul and Tiago’s on Griff. if we continue with this intensity we should sweep the rest of the games. That intensity is what we need. The Clips will come out swinging on Sunday..we should be ready. Also the only player I would consider for Leonard would be Davis and maybe not then. Leonard is big time in prime time, is Davis?
    Go Spurs!

  • camnpat

    I’ve had similar thoughts to yours but seeing the development of Leonard this season those are changing. To me there were three factors that kept him from being Pippen 2.0: ball handling, play making (play as a point forward), and offensive awareness. Two of those I have no longer questions about based on this season.

    In past seasons Leonard was a guy with OK ball handling but not someone you wanted dribbling for long stretches or that could break through defenses using that ability. Every time he would get in traffic he would get stripped somehow. Starting last season he was much better at doing this and this season has shown how much he has improved (the same can be said for Green who you didn’t want to have dribbling a couple of years ago and now is a capable one attacking the basket).

    As for offensive awareness he is showing patience in the attack and he is assessing the defense carefully before attacking. The patience he showed last night when holding the a shot for a brief second against two defenders or knowing whether to beat an opponent with height, speed, or range shows how much has improved on this. In the past he would get the ball for a fast break and just run with it in a sort of “tunnel visioned” mission to the opponent’s basket without realizing about a trailing player about to steal the ball or the one ahead preparing for an offensive foul. He has improved tremendously with the latter and reduced the former quite a bit (he still had a moment last night attacking the basket in a fast break but being completely unaware Paul was two steps behind ready to steal the ball).

    What he still needs to show is whether or not he can run an offense. In a team with Tony and Manu this is not needed of him but that is the only aspect of his game that needs to be in place to truly become Pippen 2.0.

  • DorieStreet

    Yes, it took a while…and it seemed like each player took turns— and deliberate steps—-to shake off their injuries, some indifference, lack of cohesiveness and focus-to return to form. The tasks are by no means finished (Tony and Manu are still off-and-on, up-and-down……but age & aches have diminished their skillsets and capabilities). But if that guy wearing #2 is going to bring spectacular efforts like last night in this series—all of his team mates have no choice but to get right, step up, play hard and well alongside him—-and let’s see how far this squad can compete and win this spring.

  • the drwolff

    Kristian, you seem to be an indepth fan who enjoys the game and writes interesting themes. I’m going to ask you if you are ready to admit yet again that you are wrong. Through no fault of your own the bandwagon wants to compare Kawhi to Pippen….and that is cool…but if you want to know how good Kawhi is then you need to actually compare 23yo kawhi to 23 yo pippen and not prime pippen of 28/30 yo. A quick glance shows some similarities but if you just use player A and player B instead of “Kawhi” and “THE LEGEND OF PIPPEN” …

    Player A 18.2 ppg 8.2rpg 2.9 ast 2.6stl .8bl .519/.342/.802

    Player B 15.6 6.6 3.8 2.1 .9 .496/.273/.668

    all per 36min numbers

    Now if you want to say that Kawhi TODAY, as he steps on the court is, PRIME, 6-8 year 3 ring veteran Scottie Pippen…I’m ok with that. However, math doesn’t lie and is not ambiguous. Kawhi vs 23 YO Pippen is not even close. 1 more assist, even blocks, then buried in all other stats is not even close. 23 yo Pippen WISHES he were putting up Kawhi’s numbers. BTW Kawhi had a BAD Kawhi year for shooting 3’s with the eyes. Kawhi isn’t just better then the league realized. He’s better then even WE realize. t

  • Kristian Holvoet

    Up to a point. There are always complications comparing across eras. First, as I said, Kawhi is stronger and already a better rebounder than Pippin. Pippin was, and probably always will be a better ball handler and play maker. Why? Because the Chicago offense and personnel required it. Given Kawhi’s development in shooting and individual offense, it is clear is willing and able to improve skills. If he played in 1987-1999 Bulls, I am sure he would have developed better ball skills, but probably not the outside shooting he needs for the Spurs pace and space.

    At the same time, there is one major difference between Kawhi and Pippen: Durability.
    Pippin : 1614/2413/3148/3014 Minutes played 79/73/82/82 Games Played, first four years.
    Kawhi: 1534/1810/1923/2033 Minutes played, 64/58/66/64 Games Played, first four years.

    (Okay, IIRC, Kawhi’s first year was the lockout, but years 2-4 are worse for Kawhi than Pippen)

    Also, Pippen had only played two NBA seasons by age 23. Year 4 for Pippen:
    17.8ppg/7.3rpg/6.2apg/2.4steals pg/1.1 bpg, 82 games played.
    It is a bit tough to compare players that start a different ages, but Pippen continued to improve for 9 years (5 more after year four). By year four, Pippen had 16 games of 30+ points, 3 40+ points.

    At the same age, Kawhi is not a worse player than Pippen. Will he continue to amass the career number that Pippen has? The odds are against it, but certainly better than for most other players.

  • thedrwolff

    I like the point but I don’t buy into the seasons vs age argument. Athletic peak in basketball is usually around 27-29 yo. Being a rookie at 22 is NOT being a rookie at 19…otherwise I’m comparing first year Kobe to first year Duncan and thats just not fair. 18 yo timmy wouldve sat just as much as 18 yo kobe did. the difference is boys vs men and peaking at 28/29. College programs were MUCH better then and the talent level was quite a bit higher before the “DRAFT EM OUT OF KINDERGARDEN” frenzy. Like they didnt practice dribbling and shooting in their junior and senior years of college. I always laugh at Kobe when he talks about being old and the mileage…at 34, like Duncan was on the beach at the tiki bar for those same 2 years in college. No, Bill Simmons was the first to try to throw out the Pippen comparison and it has obviously stuck and I see that…last year before he uncorked this jump shot…and now the step back. I’m digging how in the same response you are arguing seasons vs age…and then throw in how Pippin played quite a few more regular season games….so which one is it…seasons…or games played? you don’t get both. Finally the reason we compare at the same age is because when you START earlier in the pros….it doesnt mean your NBA life is shortened to ending at 32. i.e. we dont forever compare Kawhi to a 2 years older pippen. Games played at 19 do not somehow shorten your peak back to 25-27. Perhaps Advanced Metrics does it best when they compare best seasons and then go back from there to worst seasons. I’m saying that after this Feb, when he got through the eye thing and the tendon, we saw for the first time the Kobe Bryant J looking awesome and smooth night in and night out. We caught a glimpse in the finals but Kawhi is going to be a MUCH better offensive player then Pippen. He has a long way to go to match the defensive legacy to be sure but he’s already at that ability. Let’s not forget that this season Kawhi WAS injured AND half blind for much of the year. Real Kawhi is who we’ve seen for the last 2 months…defensively Scotty…offensively…much better then Pippen (of the same age). That will bear itself out next season and that comparison will fade as inadequate. SO many times today players of good ability are shoved in everyone’s face as “SUPASTAAHHHS” when they haven’t done anything. Finally a guy who is UNDERHYPED, wins everything, and STILL gets uderhyped…I love it. Keep throwing out the commentary. it’s fun. most crumble and cry if you don’t agree with their opinions in todays give a trophy to everyone for participation society. I’m not saying you are wrong…it’s your opinion. Pippen IS one of the 50 for sure. Kawhi has a LONG way to go for that….but I’m really going to enjoy the ride and IF he can stay healthy for his career his numbers are going to be insane for all around play. 14 points a night were 3rd season young kawhi….he’s long in the past. 23-25/8/4 with 3/1 defense on 32min or less a night kawhi is here to stay.

  • thedrwolff

    Spurs Trivia….

    who is the last Spur to put up 40+ points in a game?

    50+?

    will we see a 40 point game out of Kawhi this Playoffs?

  • Dapimp Ofdayear

    Pippen was a better top-end athlete than Kawhi will ever be. But Kawhi will be the more versatile, well-rounded player when it’s all said and done.

  • Dapimp Ofdayear

    Doubttful. When he scores like that, it’s usually a blowout and he sits the last quarter. Also, the Spurs offensive philosophy doesn’t really support those type of scoring outburst.

  • DorieStreet

    I’m guessing….Parker has had the last 2 (3?) 50-pt. games for the Spurs (52, 55, (5-?)).
    Tim and Manu-never had 50; Tim has probably a half-dozen 40-pt. outputs, Manu — 3.

  • DorieStreet

    If a game goes off into the 110+ scoring level for both teams, that would be a scenario where Kawhi gets to/over 40 points. Usually one of the opponents’ players is putting up a similar number (or a couple have 30+ points).

  • brunostrange

    I dunno about 40+, but I imagine the last Spur to score 50+ was probably David Robinson around 20-25 years ago, when he was fighting Shaq for the regular season scoring championship. I believe he dropped 71 points on the last game of the season.

  • Thedrwolff

    Parker with 55 and 10 assists in OT at minnesota 2008

    Parker had 31 in 1st HALF against Dallas Playoffs 2009 41 total

    less then 1 year ago Tony puts up 32 against Dallas game 7

    Something is going on with Tony this season. I’m not sure what, but he’s going to have a game soon. You just simply don’t lose ” IT ” in 11.5 months after 14 years.