Sunday, March 8th, 2009...4:57 pm
The Notebook: Suns-Spurs, 3/8/09
The Spurs defeated the Suns in San Antonio this afternoon, 103-98. The game unfolded in a rather predictable manner, given the absence of Amare Stoudemire and the Suns’ return to a fast-paced, relatively defenseless style. With the win, the Spurs remain in firm control of the West’s 2nd spot while the Suns slide further and further behind the 8th seed (they are currently 4 games back of the Mavs).
For 3 1/2 quarters, the Spurs were productive on the offensive end of the floor (at the beginning of the 3rd we suffered an inevitable but comparatively brief drought). We average just over 19 free throw attempts a game but the Spurs found their way to the charity stripe 27 times this afternoon. A collectively hot hand from outside allowed us to match the Suns’ impressive 1st quarter 30 point performance but our consistent penetration (and clutch mid-range shooting down the stretch) is what helped us remain in control for the majority of the game. Even in the 3rd, during which our offense was least effective, we remained focused on reaching the rim. During that time our players best equipped to make their way into the paint were Roger Mason and Matt Bonner (in other words, we had no one equipped to make their way into the paint), but for 48 minutes we never lost sight of the value of getting high-percentage shots in the lane.
Against such a porous defense, it’s easy to think our offense won it for us. But, in the true spirit of Spurs’ dogma, it was the defense that secured the win. Our most impressive quarter of the game was the second, in which we held the high-powered Suns to a mere 15 points. Steve Nash hit a 5-foot jumper with 5:18 left in the second to tie the game 45-45. The Spurs would go into the locker room at half up 58-45. For over 5 minutes, the Spurs held the Suns scoreless. This is no easy feat. Part of it can be attributed to the Spurs’ “killer instinct,” part of it to Shaq’s poor conditioning (he was productive in both the 1st and the start of the 3rd but by the end of each half he was completely irrelevant). Either way, when the Spurs got serious on the defensive end, the Suns struggled to respond.
The game ended on a similar note. The Suns put together a heroic attempt to remain competitive but a flood of steals by the Spurs made Phoenix’s loss seem inevitable. Although the general storyline is familiar (spurs lockdown on D, win in crunch time), the way it happened is a tad uncommon. Our defense is most effective when forcing low-percentage shots and getting in position to secure the rebound. But we held off the Suns by filling passing lanes and producing turnovers. Creating steals often seems too risky. A failed attempt will most likely leave a man open and lead to an easy bucket for the opposing team. But our late-game turnovers didn’t feel like gambles; they felt surgical.
Some impressive outside shooting by Leandro Barbosa, Grant Hill, and Steve Nash kept the game from getting completely out of hand but our offense remained too efficient and our defensive rebounding too consistent. By avoiding the Hack-a-Shaq and needing shooters on the floor, the Suns left themselves in a tough position when it came to rebounding. Down 10 with 4 to play, the Suns just weren’t getting the second chance looks it takes to pull off the comeback.
If I had to give away the game ball, it would go to Tony Parker and not just because he put up another 30-point game (12 of which came in the 4th for those of who you don’t think Parker can make shots in the clutch). He was also a key piece in our defensive stands. Duncan sat for much of the 4th quarter. During that time, Parker dictated the outcome of the game on both ends of the floor. He made crisp rotations, swiped a couple of the previously mentioned steals, drained mid-range jumpers, and finished at the rim. This afternoon we did not see Parker’s most impressive offensive performance of the season but we received a balanced, focused effort from our All-Star point guard.
Somewhat unexpectedly Ime Udoka saw 24 minutes of court time this afternoon (he is averaging 12.9 minutes a game this season). He used them wisely, going 4-8 from the field while hauling down 2 boards and dishing 2 dimes. Equally unexpectedly, Malik Hairston received a DNP-CD. Between Matt Barnes, Grant Hill, and Jared Dudley, the Suns play a SF-heavy rotation which explains Udoka’s minutes. But Hairston’s absence caught me off guard.
In recent weeks Hairston has been one of the first players off the bench. Against a fast-paced team like the Suns (who in some instances we encouraged to out-run themselves instead of trying to slow them down) Malik’s athleticism seems like a valuable asset. My guess is that Pop thought exposing an unsophisticated player like Malik to the Suns’ up-tempo style was dangerous. Playing at such a quick pace is alluring for a rookie but can lead to poor defensive decisions and too many offensive gambles. It may also be a sign that Malik hasn’t shown enough progress to make it into our playoff rotation.
Fabricio Oberto didn’t play as well but, given how shallow the Suns’ frontcourt is without Amare Stoudemire, I am not particularly surprised. Oberto sees limited minutes when we face teams with only 1 imposing big man. With Duncan and Shaq entering and exiting in unison for nearly the entire game, Oberto’s presence never really seemed necessary.
I’ll avoid making some awful “setting Suns” remark here, but I will say that, if Phoenix plans on making the playoffs, they better get hot and do it fast. They are 4 games out of the 8th seed with 19 left to play.
On Tuesday the Spurs face the Bobcats in San Antonio. In our first meeting this season the Spurs narrowly won a hard-fought game in Charlotte 86-84.
13 Comments
March 8th, 2009 at 6:58 pm
Old man Bowen got in some good minutes tonight too. I was wondering though, he was 1-5 on his trademark side three today. Is it still a good idea for Pop to let him take that shot????
March 8th, 2009 at 7:06 pm
Bowen did have a good game even though he didn’t shoot well (he was +12 during 30 minutes of play).
On the season he is .444 from 3-point range. During his career he is only .393. As long as his 3-point percentage stays above 40% and he only shoots when wide open in the corner, it’s alright by me.
March 8th, 2009 at 8:48 pm
It’s downright madness that Udoka saw so many minutes and Malik stayed in the bench. What kind of progress does he need to show to replace Udoka? He actually played well in the first half, but later on went back to his usual disappointing self.
I’m surprised that you didn’t say more about Tim’s absence in the 4th. At one point Kurt, our only big in the lineup, went out - and instead of Timmy going back in, Pop subbed him for Bowen. I think Finley was the tallest Spur at that point… But hey, it worked, and it’s further proof that Pop is the craziest coach in this league.
I haven’t looked up the stats -I don’t trust them!- but Bowen can’t be shooting 40% in the last, say, 10 games. I remember him missing a number of wide open shots lately. Maybe it’s just the impression because I expect him to make that open corner triple every time.
I personally think the Suns are done. I’m sorry for Nash, but the number of mistakes Kerr and his staff made in the last two years is staggering.
Good win.
March 8th, 2009 at 10:44 pm
You’re right Latin_D, I could have discussed Duncan’s absence in the 4th further.
In some ways, it kind of seemed like an implicit agreement between Gentry and Pop. As if they had said, “I’ll go small if you go small” and it all worked out.
More seriously, I think Duncan didn’t play because, behind close doors, Pop knows he isn’t at 100%. And if he isn’t at 100% and Shaq wasn’t on the court (he wasn’t for much of the fourth), than Duncan doesn’t have a great reason to be on the court either. He came in at the end to help secure the win but as long as we were scoring easily and pulling down defensive boards without him, I’m not sure Pop wanted to push him.
March 8th, 2009 at 10:55 pm
Parker scoring 12 poingts in the 4th quarter against the defensively challenged Suns does not all of a sudden make him clutch.
He had a good game, but let’s not get carried away..
March 9th, 2009 at 5:28 am
Was really pleased to see George Hill play so well. He played good defense down the stretch and seemed to really bother Steve Nash. I know Pop likes to put Bowen on Nash because of his size, but I think Hill’s size and quickness really bothered Nash. It kind of took me by surprise, but seemed to work out really well and if we do see the Suns again (if they can make the playoffs), playing Hill on Nash can provide good D, without giving up as much offense as having Bowen constantly in the game.
March 9th, 2009 at 7:55 am
Sean C, I think this game along with everything TPs done in Many’s recent absence does make him clutch.
March 9th, 2009 at 11:34 am
Off-topic: I just spend an hour watching David Robinson’s videos on the youtube thing on the previous post. It’s nice to see footage of young Robinson and remember what a beast he once was. I wonder how much better he would have be if he hadn’t had back problems since early in his career.
March 9th, 2009 at 4:01 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hY5hus3zZCU
that’s clutch.
March 9th, 2009 at 4:14 pm
No one said Manu isn’t clutch.
Is there some unwritten rule that says only one player per team is allowed to be clutch?
March 9th, 2009 at 8:08 pm
I’m all for Tony having the ball in the last few seconds, as long as he’s not about to take a 3.
March 10th, 2009 at 1:44 pm
I would also like to point out that Kurt Thomas was key in securing that win in the 4th quarter. I am honestly usually underwhelmed by him (probably because I’m spoiled by Timmy), but his solid defense and excellent rebounding on some key plays was impressive and makes me excited for what he could do for us in the playoffs. Props, Kurt.
March 10th, 2009 at 2:46 pm
Only one player can take the final shot of a game so 100/100 times I pick..
Manu>Tony
Leave a Reply