The Science Was Sound

by Timothy Varner

I’d argue that the science was sound. Three past-their-prime vets for a dynamic wing. In a vacuum, you make that move every time. It was a good move. Kudos to R.C. Buford.

But as the Richard Jefferson trade has shown, basketball is not all science. It’s science, some stuff you can’t quantify and luck. And the Richard Jefferson trade has failed on the last two accounts. No sense in pretending the world is round, when we all know it’s flat. Or some such.

Adrian Wojnarowski has written a helpful piece on the Spurs’ current disposition toward RJ, and it’s not rosy. Go read that. But I want to frame this discussion around two talking points from yesterday’s press.

John Hollinger says the Spurs are not a lock for the postseason.

In fact, the top-eight Western team most likely to miss the postseason isn’t any of the seven I mentioned above: It’s San Antonio. Say this to anyone in the league, and you’ll immediately be countered with the absolute dead certainty of the Spurs finishing in the top eight, and there’s a logic behind this: San Antonio has a superior point differential (plus-4.7 per game) and a 2½ game lead over the Rockets in the West. Combine that with the expectation of the Spurs’ patented second-half surge, and they’d seem a lock.

Unfortunately, the Spurs haven’t cashed in on their favorable early schedule. San Antonio is 29-20, but with its scoring margin it should be 34-15; that’s the league’s greatest negative disparity and could come back to bite the team in the second half of the season. The thing everyone misses about the Spurs is that they have only 12 home games left, and in addition their opponents’ strength is among the league’s most difficult over the final 33 games. As a result, the Playoff Odds give the Spurs a 71.4 percent chance of making the postseason — solid, but far from a lock.

Still, the Spurs project to finish the season with 47 wins … and the Rockets to come in ninth with 43.

I can buy that. But assume Richard Jefferson is not the Spurs’ future. And remember that Manu Ginobili may not be back next season, and even if so, he’ll be a year older. Given those realities, I’d rather see the Spurs miss the playoffs and try their hand at lottery-luck than qualify for the playoffs only to be bounced in the first round.

The lottery doesn’t guarantee the Spurs more than they have now, but it puts them in a better place to build around their core of Tim Duncan, Tony Parker, DeJuan Blair and George Hill. Maybe, come July, we include Tiago Splitter’s name into the mix. It’s a nice start.

But even with that core, or more precisely, because of it, you can see that San Antonio’s talent base is not sufficient to compete in the West. Add a lottery pick, and the team is still woefully short-handed. That’s talking point No. 1.

This leads us to our second talking point. Chemistry.

Gregg Popovich recently opined, “We’ve never had a group like this that didn’t gel, as far as being consistent night after night. I think if we change this person for that person, we’d still have the same problem.”

Well, yes and no, Pop. Yes and no.

There is no question that the Spurs lack chemistry, and that more new faces would only seem to exasperate the problem. But there is a prior consideration, one that is more basic to San Antonio’s concerns. Can this current group ever get to the point of championship contention? On paper, one would think so. But on the court they’re a messy ragtag of underachievement. In my estimation, all that unquantifiable stuff and need for good luck just isn’t in the mix with the team’s current personnel.

If I’m correct, then trading one set of chemistry issues for another isn’t a 1:1 exchange. Rather, it’s an opportunity to find a better mix of players. One whose sense of the game is more conducive to one another. Plus, it gives the new mix an opportunity to play together for half a season prior to next summer’s training camp. It’s an opportunity to put the pieces in place for next season’s championship run.

If that last sentence strikes you as odd, let me explain. I’m not at all convinced this season’s struggles amount to the end of an era. The Spurs still have time to get back to the top during the Duncan window. But it’s going to take a radical re-approach, and the clock is ticking. But really, the Spurs are one move away from being next year’s popular dark horse selection. Watch it happen.

R.C. Buford and his staff rarely make mistakes. And the Richard Jefferson trade wasn’t one of them. It was, as I said, the right move. The mistake in this situation is to deny the obvious: the current team doesn’t work. Call a mulligan, R.C. You’ve earned it. Take what you now know and go get this one back.

We’ll wait for you to make it right. No worries. And, if you don’t, being the winningest team of the last decade wasn’t so bad.

  • http://www.aegisediting.com SpursOK

    I’m disappointed but not surprised to hear Wojnarowski say the Spurs have shopped RJ…but haven’t got any bites. Perhaps under another offensive (and defensive) system, he’d thrive again (I’m thinking the Suns, for instance, with Nash to feed him).

    I too have had the thought that we might be better off planning for next season. Also, we should realize that unless Duncan thinks to retire in the near-term, though his skills will be reduced, he will still be a factor for years yet should he choose to play and barring major injuries. A young and budding core with Duncan as a Robinson-esque statesman would ease the discomfort over a “lost” season…but only if we see the future’s silver horizon glimmering.

  • Bryan

    Good way to put things in perspective, Tim. Taking a shot at the lottery may not be a bad idea this season. This team definitely can’t make it past the 2nd round of the playoffs (at best!), so why bother. Making a trade to give the team some time to gel for next season and trying to add a lottery pick isn’t a bad idea. I think I’m onboard with this plan. Even though it sucks to waste a year in the Duncan era, we are essentially doing that as things stand.

  • http://www.maxmktg.com Tom in Bakersfield, CA

    RJ was horrible last night. Parker and Ginobili had good enough games to win. TD was OK, but not dominant. How does Tim not shoot one free throw the whole game? RJ needs to be cut off from ever shooting a long shot again. On paper RJ works, in reality, he doesn’t.

    PS - McDysse wasnt’ much better. That makes both major acquisitions busts.

  • VP of Common Sense

    The only thing that could be worse than last nights performance would be if there were naked pictures of Pop’s “favorite player” floating around on the Internet..

    Oh wait.

  • DieHardSpur

    I believe it was bad coaching that lost us the game last night. We went small for almost a total of 20 mintues. Most of those 20 minutes had Blair as our center and Jefferson/Finley at power forwar. I case you have never watched a basketball game; that doesnt work against a team like the Nets, much less the defending champion Lakers. Wake up POP!

    Many teams go small, and there is a time for it; I understand. Have we ever though about playing BIG? Dejuan at the 3? Especially against Ron Artest? They are the exact same build, and i would bet that Blair has better handles and footwork.

    In a game like last night; when we are getting eaten alive by big men, we go small, or have Bonner and Duncan together. (Kudos to Bonner, He was at least in his man’s face most of the time.)

    I like Matt Bonner. He out-hustles everyone on the team. is he good enough to play on this team? No. It is not his fault that he gets Ian’s minutes. If Mahinmi would play with the assertion of Bonner, we would all have our Twin Towers that we all want.

    Enough ranting… bottom line -

    Jefferson - stop shooting outside when you are ice cold.

    Blair - Just because you get the rebound doesn’t mean you have to put it back.

    Pop - Play length against length. Theo avg. almost 3 blocks per game his entire career… He knows what to do, give him Bonner’s minutes Damnit!

  • Tyler

    I disagree with the notion that the Spurs would be better off in the lottery this year. If that were to happen, the Spurs would more than likely not pick higher than 11 or 12. Outside of 2-3 players every draft, you’re hoping to get a role player at that point. Also, the difference between a guy at #12 and a guy at #24 isn’t much at all. What do we really gain by not making the playoffs besides a week’s rest?

    Also, I’d like to see how Blair and Hill perform in the playoffs. There’s good experience to be gained for each of them.

  • zeus

    This is an honest observation of this uneven Spurs group that we have come to see this year. I was wondering the same thing: what if we DID make a trade right now to ensure us that our future will look bright? I see young players being able to play at a better rate than past-their-prime players of Jefferson, Bogans, Mason, Finley, and Bonner. We could trade some of them for young, defensive-minded athletes like Tyrus Thomas and Corey Brewer; then, waiting for us in the Summer will be Tiago Splitter, and, coupled with a high draft pick we seem inevitably to receive this year, we can make a solid pick.

    Also, nobody really talks about us in the Free Agent Arms Race for this Summer. With about 3-5 players being let go from our roster, we can still sign an impact player, can’t we? I mean, it might have to be a low-cost signing, but hypothetically it could still happen.

  • ruth bader ginobili

    Might be a bad year to play the lottery. Supposedly its a top-heavy class, and SA would probably wind up in the low teens.

    Tim, is there a chance that this would be a better playoff team than a regular season team? More mins for the Big three would help.

    Personally, I think the wings are the problem on this team. Could Pop get away with playing Tony and Manu 40 mins each in the post-season? If so, that’s 20-ish less mins of mediocore play from the Jefferson/Mason/Bogans/Finley quintet.

  • Bryan

    DieHard, I’m mostly with you. Going small may work at times, but not against the Lakers. We got killed on the boards when we were small. The Lakers were even too long for Dejuan, as he only had 2 rebounds last night.

    Tyler, good players aren’t only picked at the top 4 slots in a draft. Here are a few draft picks in the last couple of drafts that contribute:
    2009: Jennings (10), Collison (21), Casspi (23)
    2008: Brook Lopez (10), Anthony Randolph (14), Mareese Speights (16), J. J. Hickson (19)
    2007: Joakim Noah (9), Thaddeus Young (12), Rodney Stuckey (15)

    In going for the lottery, we aren’t trying to win the next Tim Duncan. We’d be looking for somebody who could contribute to an NBA Championship team.

  • VP of Common Sense

    Pop should have stuck to his philosophy of only bringing in players who “having something to prove” or “are over themselves”.

    Richard Jefferson does not qualify as either.

  • VP of Common Sense

    @Bryan

    You just made the argument against your point. You named guys from the last 3 draft classes.

    Let’s start from pick#10 through the rest of the first round. That’s 20 picks. Multiply that by the last three drafts and you have 60 players.

    You named 10 guys who are contributing. That means there are 50 guys who are not contributing.

    Not very good odds.

  • idahospur

    I’m glad that the FO took a chance to bring in another “star” but RJ has not been shining. I can’t see a single role he is playing to help this team win games, whether it be by his own lack of ability or overwhelmed playing the 4, with Blair at the 5. If we proceed with this group, Pop needs to find one area where RJ can succeed and run plays through that, as well as the normal offense plays.
    One thing that was getting to me last night, Duncan and Parker both on the bench to start the 4th and both didn’t come back in until it was half-over. The two best players on the team on the bench in the 4th, when behind? And since we can’t make 3′s, how was this team supposed to catch up?
    I don’t want to see this team in the lottery, unless it is the result of a trade. I like Haywood being brought in, only $6M for one year, and then cut him for Splitter. Sign Manu if he’ll work for peanuts, which is what most teams will offer a summer playing injury-prone older player.
    Figure out what trades can be made, hopefully if we can ship RJ for not losing too much on the dollar, but I think he is next to impossible to move. Go for everything and win games!

  • Tyler

    Bryan - You just listed guys from picks in the lottery to guys in the late first round, proving my point for me. If you can find quality guys later in the first round, what’s the added value of a late lottery pick and missing the playoffs? Not too much….

    I agree, there are good players found outdside the top 2-3 guys, but they can be found all over the draft as you pointed out. Sliding a few spot higher (unless it’s a top 3 pick) isn’t a good enough return in exchange for not making the playoffs.

  • Bryan

    @VP
    True, there are probably close to 50 guys who aren’t contributing. I like to have a little more faith that the Spurs front office is better at evaluating players and won’t draft a bust. Of course, that isn’t guaranteed.

    @Tyler,
    Yes, there are players available outside of the lottery that can contribute. I just think that in the lottery, the team stands a better chance of snagging those players.

    I just don’t think that there is a whole lot of difference between missing the playoffs and making it past the 1st round of the playoffs (at least, as a Spurs fan. Bobcats fans might tell you differently). I’d rather have a better chance at landing an impact player in the draft and try to improve team chemistry for next year.

  • Kevin

    I have to agree with Tyler that it’s not worth missing the playoffs. That’s extra revenue they’d be missing out on (which might make them rethink the luxury tax hit they’re currently taking. Also the experience thing for Hill and Blair.

  • David G

    The teams has no chemistry. I know Popovich loves to keep his guys fresh but he really needs to shorten up the rotation. I think the other problem is that Manu is by far the Spurs best wing defender which puts them in a bind but I’d like to see this for at least the next few games before the trade deadline passes.

    PG-Parker
    SG-Mason
    SF-Ginobili
    PF-McDyess
    C-Duncan

    Bench-

    Jefferson as the back up wing
    Hill as the back up PG/Combo
    Bonner or Blair depending if you need shooting or Energy/Rebounding.

    The big three need to play more minutes and Boogans needs to be cut out of the rotation entirely.

    The Spurs still need a shot altering big man defensively or a stud wing defender…both would be preferable.

  • Adam

    When you have Timmy D on your team your always a contender. If the spurs can shop some expiring contracts and get the ‘Robert Horry’ of this day and age who can defend and provide the athleticism the spurs are lacking, we can go through to the western conference finals and get another shot at the lakers. Nobody in the west is playing ‘out-of-this-world basketball which leaves the door wide open.

  • SpurredOn

    I was hesitant to join the trade brigade, for the chemistry reasons mentioned in the article. I will now happily do anything to rid this team of Jefferson. Start Hairston; at least he gets back on defense and knows his limitations on offense. Plus he has an upside.

    I would rather make a trade (that does not touch the big 3, Hill or Blair) and take my chances on that jelling rather than hope RJ finds some aggression and an improved basketball IQ.

    Even and okay game from RJ last night (16 points, getting back on defense) and the Spurs win. It was always said that win Bowen the Spurs were playing 4 on 5. Well, they still are, only this guy can’t defend and or hit an open 3.

  • Charrua

    The problem with RJ is that he never was the player the Spurs imagined he was. He’s not and never has been a particularly good outside shooter (decent but not great), he’s never been a lockdown defender (again, good but not great) and its main claim to fame has been to take a lot of shots in crappy teams and to finish a lot of great Jason Kidd passes in transition on some good teams.
    Guess what? Kidd isn’t here, this team doesn’t run as much and there are a lot less shots than before. The Spurs brought him to make the things he’s only average at and they are surprised that it doesn’t work out great.

  • Ash

    How much of the Kool-aid have you been drinking? The RJ trade was NEVER a good idea. I laughed out loud the day I saw it.

    RJ is a guy who relied on his athleticism (which is now gone) to get alley oops from a transcendant passing point guard (which the Spurs don’t have) in a fast breaking system (with the Spurs don’t employ). What made you think this was a good trade?

  • http://Spursreport.com ALSPURS

    I am just at a loss for words at this point….

    I don’t agree with you guys that say miss the postseason and go in the lottery…

    We went all-in this summer…

    You can’t go back on that at this point but this team just does not have it….

    The only thing that will help is an TRADE!!!

    We need to get players in…we need a spark…we need a breath if fresh air….

    Hopefully by the 18th we can get that… If not this Dynasty will be all but over…

  • ThatBigGuy

    This article and the comments are getting dangerously close to “tank” mode. That has got to be the most disturbing and troubling thing I have ever read on this site. Trading a playoff streak unequaled in pro sports for the 13th pick in the NBA draft is not only astoundingly defeatist, but incredibly weak-hearted.

    The purpose of a NBA team is to win as many games as possible, up to and including Game 7 of the Finals. It is not the purpose of an NBA team to putz around, trying not to win, and hope they can land a decent draft pick in order to make a run next year. That’s the kind of attitude that keeps Golden State and Charlotte in the basement of the league.

  • Oeste

    At this point, I think Hairston and Mahimni would be more productive with the McDyss and Jefferson minutes. Let’s trade them to any team that can give up a workable point guard so Tony can take time off, or a definsive minded, rebounding big. I think their best bet is to go with Portland. They need personel right now. An athletic cutter and a big man with a jump shot could work in their system. Heck, throw in Bonner and Portland might be willing to give up Miller or Howard. Both teams benefit.

  • Tyler

    ThatBigGuy - I agree. I don’t understand the logic behind wanting to miss the playoffs. For what? We draft a guy in the late lottery when we can get almost the same type player in the 20′s?

    #1. Our young guys need playoff expierence.
    #2. The Spurs organization needs any and all revenue it can get.
    #3. The Spurs haven’t missed the playoffs in the Tim Duncan era - I don’t want to start a new trend. How many guys, in any sport, can you say have never missed the playoffs in their career?
    #4. Karma - as a diehard Spurs’ fan, I can’t fathom rooting against this team. That kind of fandom only comes back to haunt you.

    I’m sure there are a few more reasons….

  • doggydogworld

    #3 I think Robert Horry not only made the playoffs every year but always made it to at least the 2nd round. Not to mention 7 rings.

    I agree it makes no sense to intentionally miss the playoffs. The extra revenue offsets any gain from picking 14th instead of 20th.

  • Bryan

    ThatBigGuy & Tyler,
    I think my point got muddled somewhere in my argument. I was agreeing with Tim’s post about making a trade at the risk of missing the playoffs. Pop seems to think (and I agree) that the problem is with team cohesion. He has flat out said that making a trade wasn’t the solution. The message that I took from this post was that the Spurs should make a trade looking towards next year at the risk of this year’s performance - because no way will a major player be able to gel with this year’s team. In no way am I hoping the Spurs tank to make the lottery. I couldn’t bear for the team that I root for to make that sort of a mockery out of the NBA. I was just trying to say a trade that looks towards next year may not be a bad idea.

  • Bryan

    And Tyler, you do make a great point about extra revenue from the playoffs. I’m sure our small market team needs that extra income.

  • Tyler

    Bryan - gotcha. I didn’t take your post to mean you wanted to tank. I was more or less addressing the overall tone of the postings.

    I also agree - if there is a trade that makes us a legit contender next year, I would pull the trigger at the risk of this year. No matter what though, I have a hard time believing TD will let us miss the playoffs this year.

  • jeff

    I would rather lose with some of the young guys than lose with the old guys. Let’s give some of the Toros players some run.

  • Mariano

    I actually think that the Spurs could go back to being a winning team with RJ still being in the mix. How? All they need is RJ to start playing like he was playing the first 10 games of the season, attacking the basket and being able to finish, getting key free throws, playing aggresive D, etc…

    Now all I see him do is wait in the corner and play lazy D, if he restarts playing well the Spurs have a shot at the title.

  • Ted

    I don’t like how the Spurs look this year, either, but the FO will do what they will do, despite all our suggestions. All we can do as Spurs fans is keep talking and also waiting to see what RC and Pop decide to do. It’s a pretty awful limbo we are all in this mid-season.

  • J

    Jefferson is not the only mis-hap of the Spur’s braintrust in recent years. Roger Mason was supposed to be the starting 2 of the future, but seems to be in Pop’s doghouse, behind Hill, Bogans, and Ginobili at the position. I don’t know what the plans were for Bogans, but having him start so many games suggests there was hope he would be the second coming of Bruce Bowen, which he’s not.

    I think Pop should have a big-man rotation and a separate wing rotation, and set the first unit of wing players to be Parker, Mason, and Finley, and the second unit to be Hill, Ginobili, and Jefferson. Have Mason, Finley, Hill, and Jefferson play off the ball on half court sets in their respective rotations.

    Maybe Jefferson can find a rhythm coming off the bench. True, he’d be overpaid as a role player, but I’d rather have an overpaid productive role player than an overpaid unproductive starter. Jefferson could develop into instant offense off the bench with the opposing team’s role player guarding him, and this might help him get his confidence back.

    If the Spurs could trade for a defensive-minded 3 for the first unit, that would be great as well.

    But I heard Pop wants to trade for a backup PG and make Hill the starter at the 2.

  • http://www.48minutesofhell.com/2010/04/17/san-antonio-spurs-regular-season-recap/ San Antonio Spurs regular season keyed by Manu Ginobili | 48 Minutes of Hell

    [...] no. 24: The Science Was Sound, Richard Jefferson was [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus