Tiago Splitter, Trade Asset

by

The Draft is almost upon us. There have been several reports that the Spurs are looking to trade into the first round, with one rumor having them interested in Washington’s 5th pick. But, honestly, we heard similar things last year. The cold reality of limited assets and the tough business of locating agreeable trade partners quiets most of the rumor-mongering.

This year’s trade speculation rests against the backdrop of needed change, with almost all those who follow the Spurs calling for or expecting overhaul this offseason. Don Harris recently quoted Spurs color analyst and family member Sean Elliott saying, “…I would fully expect us to have a revamped team next season.” His expectation seems universal.

A few of our readers have asked, given the team’s limited assets, whether Tiago Splitter’s rights could help a trade proposal go through. If Splitter is not tied to the rookie scale, as we’ve previously argued, one would think his rights would hold some value, certainly more than we assumed a year ago.

Tiago Splitter projects as an NBA starter, or at least a quality rotation big. He’s only 24 years old, but has the professional experience of a seasoned vet. And in this topsy-turvy economy, one wonders if his buyout situation is not actually attractive to teams. Put differently, if you’re a team that is not enamored with adding a rookie to your 2009-10 payroll, acquiring the rights to a talented big who requires zero immediate payment (and won’t until at least next summer) is something of a win-win. You avoid the cap hit, but still get to add a valuable player to your pipeline. Looking at the bigs available in this draft, Splitter would probably rank with Jordan Hill and DeJuan Blair, not far behind Hasheem Thabeet. Some might rank him ahead of the other three.

If this is the case, why would the Spurs want to give him up? If he came to the team next season, he’s a lock for a productive 25 mpg.

The simple answer is that he provides an asset the team currently lacks. He’s the young prospect that could put a cap relief package over the top. And again, that’s with the added luxury of staying off the books until at least 2010.

The Spurs recent dalliance with Yiannis Bouroussis is an indicator that shoring up their front line is an immediate priority, one that Tim Duncan cannot afford for them to sit on for another year. I expect the team to target another big with their MLE (Charlie Villanueva?). Then there is the possibility of Ian Mahinmi bouncing back from injury and contributing to the rotation. And most of us expect that if Chris Bosh is available next summer, the Spurs will use their cap space to make a run at him, however unlikely the odds. Add all that up. Where does Tiago Splitter fit into the puzzle?

But that’s on the optimistic view. The pessimist is happy to respond by saying the Spurs could strike out in free agency, Mahinmi could flop, and the team could completely miss their 2010 free agent target. If some combination of those things were to occur, Splitter is a mighty nice insurance policy.

Obviously, he’s the sort of asset one doesn’t just give away. There is no question he benefits the team a year from now. The question, however, is could he benefit the team 4 days from now? And if so, to what degree and how?

So to our readers who’ve asked what value Splitter’s rights hold, my answer is a curiosity struck “dunno.” I’d like to think he could command a pick somewhere between 10 and 20, but I also see the world through shades of silver and black.

  • Rey

    Do I see “Luis Scola, part 2” here if the Spurs trade Splitter? As has been noted, the guy seems to be a very talented player and has a lot of potential being an important NBA player (maybe in the likes of Peja or Z), but there’s always the risk of being a bust (Darko, Spanoulis).

    Unless trading him for a Top 10-quality player who has the same attitude as Timmy, Manu and Tony would be a possibility (I’ve been hearing a lot about Cassipi), then maybe the Spurs can let go of Splitter, keep the Big 3 intact and hone the new draft pick along with Hill, Mason and Bonner. I must admit I was quite disappointed with how the rotation changed so much in the last season and I was just glad Hill wasn’t traded or bought out. I hope the Spurs would have the intuition that while the greats are still there and able, they would let them teach the newbies to be better, selfless athletes as they pass the “baton” to the younger generation of Spurs.

  • http://www.48minutesofhell.com Timothy Varner

    Rey,

    I think the Splitter situation is a different thing than the Jackie Butler contract dump (Luis Scola). Apples and oranges.

    The ever changing rotation was an annoyance last season, but I think that had something to do with injury (lots of it) and the Spurs not having the right personnel to compete against the more dominant teams. Pop was trying to luck into something good, but it never came. If the team’s talent upgraded, I suspect Pop would be less of a mad scientist with his rotations.

  • BlaseE

    Gist, Villanueva, Duncan, Splitter, and Ian in 2010….

    That is a good looking, young front court.

    I wonder where Ian would go in this years’ draft. Early to late second round?

  • tomasito

    I bet that Ian would have torn up the NCAAs, averaging tons of points and rebounds while shooting a high percentage, just like he did in D-League action. We mock the D-League, but remember that it is much higher quality than college ball, because it is composed almost entirely of guys who used to be stars in college and some who have played in the NBA.

    I bet he would be a lottery pick with two or three years of college under his belt.

  • http://myspace.com/ka1z3r KA1Z3R

    Villanueva, there’s name I hadn’t thought of, but am delighted at the thought of. I say we should get him, anything’s better than Bonner’s bad D.

  • http://myspace.com/ka1z3r KA1Z3R

    Any word on whether the Spurs will resign Gooden? I mean why not? He was our best non-big 3 scorer with nearly 12 ppg and was our second best rebounder with 7.9 rpg. And this is coming off the bench mind you. (However those are his season averages not his Spur averages) I think as a bench presence, he could do some good for us.

  • dtm

    re: gooden
    how serious was his groin injury? is he healthy?
    if we can have someone more versatile than gooden, then i’d rather not resign him. we need someone with a little more range and at the same time, be able to finish inside strong, and more be a little more “athletic” than gooden… i guess someone in the mold of ariza/odom…lol

    re: this years draft
    i guess because of the last 2 years finishes and seeing the holes that the spurs have, i am more curious to see what the spurs will do in this draft and this off-season than i have been in years past.

    hoping the spurs make “the right ” decisions, but nobody knows for sure how anything will end up.

  • rj

    we havE to take him. he’s young, experienced, and huge. we can’t afford to put matt bonner at the center position for another year. if he is really not far from hasheem thabeet in terms of big man value, it is the one sure thing the spurs can do this summer for improvement (other than force Bruce Bowen into retirement and buyout Oberto). duncan broke down at the end of the season being our only athletic big for 82 games. splitter/ duncan combo sounds good to me and will take some pressure of ian to be the low post savior. DON’T TRADE HIS RIGHTS!!!

  • rj

    so does that mean splitter won’t be availible this year?

  • BlaseE

    rj,

    Sadly, we should have to wait until next season as in 2010-11. I think that is the argument for trading him now. However, I think it is worth it to give him another year though. We could always trade him in a year too. The draft could be stronger and teams will still be tight with their money waiting for all the ’10 FA’s to hit the market.

  • Jose

    Tim,

    Nice conclusion, dunno is realistic. But the Spurs do face hard decisions. Although you stated earlier to Rey that it wouldn’t be another Scola.

    Lets hope the Spurs have a plan b, if all else falls.

    By the way, villanueva would be a nice steal.