Tim Duncan is Still Looking for Help

by

Back on November 30, I wrote the following:

So far as winning streaks go, the current run is nothing to brag about. The Spurs have played 4 of 5 at home, beating Washington, Milwaukee, Golden State, Houston and Philadelphia. Prior to those five victories, San Antonio lost three in a row, and against playoff caliber competition. One could argue that that streak was more telling, that losses to Oklahoma, Dallas and Utah were more indicative of where the Spurs currently stand in Western conference pecking order.

The Spurs just capped another three game losing streak, and, again, losing all three games against playoff caliber competition. Peter Holt broke the Spurs’ bank this summer, and the early returns are mired in mediocrity. By my count, the Spurs have turned the ball over an astoundingly sloppy 53 times in three games. They’re the basketball equivalent of living paycheck to paycheck, with big bills on the horizon.

There is a deep irony in their daily living, one that is too delicious to ignore.

When the Spurs inaugurated their summer of spending, a popular justification was the need to provide Tim Duncan with more help. His window–which is the Spurs’ window– of opportunity to win another championship was closing.  The team needed fresh horses.

But through 18 games, those horses have come up lame. Rather than getting a lift from the supporting cast, Tim Duncan is playing with MVP-efficiency and barely keeping the Spurs at a half-respectable .500. If the Spurs recover from their start of sputter and stall, Tim Duncan ought to be placed at the center of the MVP conversation. He’s threatening a career season, at least in terms of efficiency. And it’s all lost on a 9-9 start.

Don’t get me wrong. It’s not that no one else is playing well. Matt Bonner is a having a career year; DeJuan Blair is occasionally sensational. Tony Parker is not dominating, but playing competent basketball. I get all that, and I could further qualify. It’s just that the supporting cast taken as a whole is providing more drag than momentum-gathering boost. Tim Duncan is all dragster, and the team is mostly parachute.

It’s a difficult thing to put one’s finger on. Why are the Spurs playing such uninspiring basketball?

In Kobe Doin’ Work, there is a scene where Bryant talks about the Spurs’ sometimes unstoppable predictability. Everyone knows what they’re going to do, he says. But San Antonio’s textbook predictability is of little detriment because, well, they execute so well.

A player is at the height of his offensive powers when he can get any shot he wants, at any moment. And he’s even higher when he has the gall to tell his opponent what he’s going to shoot, before casually dribbling to his spot and sticking the shot. This is Larry Bird. This is Michael Jordan. This was the San Antonio Spurs.

Tim Duncan is the lone Spur calling his shots.  And he continues to call glass.

  • Ruffy

    Duncan is banking it better this year than he has since about 2005. Pity the team isn’t following his lead.

  • grego

    Everyone wants to throw RJ off the bus, but…

    So far Manu has looked very un-Manu like. There was an article recently in the Express News about his confidence being low. One play that sums it up from (I believe the Denver Game) was the play where he threw the ball and it was deflected by the opponent. Then the very next play he does the same thing and it becomes a turnover.

    Injuries have played their part though. Right when Mason was taking off, he got injured and then has struggled to get back into that roll he was on.

    Hill is definitely improved, but still has a ways to go. He still can’t make up for Manu’s offense at this point. He’ll be more consistent than Blair, but he’ll still not be there offensively every night.

    McDyess is slumping.

    Parker, while playing well is turning the ball over a lot. Perhaps, Parking is trying so hard to be a passing PG, that he’s hurting his own game which is actually hurting the Spurs more. He hasn’t had those overly dominating games, like last year.

    The big problem is as volatile as the bench can be, they also haven’t gotten a consistent guy from there who can put the ball in the basket (at least until Manu is fully back- hopefully soon).

    The big problem in it all is that Manu and Duncan sat during the summer and pre-season a lot. It will benefit Duncan, but team chemistry is definitely suffering as a result.

  • Wats

    The Spurs need to get rid of RJ. He is an overpaid individual who carved a career because of J. Kidd. He is no way close to Vince Carter or even Steven Jackson. He is killing our chemistry. The Spurs need to stop turning the ball over more than they pass it around and also need to spend time practicing free-throws.

  • Tim in Surrey

    You guys are hilarious. The Spurs added more new players than any team in the league to a system that’s more complex than any in the league, two of their three best players have been banged up, and they’re traditionally a very slow starting team. Yet even though they’re sitting at .500, suddenly RJ is worse than a retired Bruce Bowen, Manu is finished, Pop can’t coach, and the Spurs are in deep trouble.

    Considering they’ve played only 18 games, that’s what I call good comedy value.

  • JT

    I don’t think we all believe the Spurs are in big trouble, I think we are all worried about not being able to win a Championship, I mean, it simply is not good enough for the Spurs to make playoffs and then lose. We will still love them, but we would be disappointed.

    We are simply following the hype that the Spurs have been advertising since the beginning of the season… Best off-season ever, etc…

    I’m looking at ticket sales and such… After a huge salary dump by the front office we should be winning games to get people excited and invest in the team, but that hasn’t happened yet. Also even though we have 6 new players, we are really playing mostly guys that have been around the league in a while, Bogans, Jefferson, McDyess are veterans and should be able to get accustomed rather quickly. The other new players Blair, Mahimmi and Hairston are barely playing so no more of these new players nonsense.

    Why do we keep mentioning this super complex system above all others in the league, I don’t see the Spurs having these super complicated offensive sets, with many screens or isolations and crazy pick and rolls. Maybe our defense can have some different sets, but come on…. these guys have been playing basketball for how many years and are making too much money for that to be an excuse.

    We shall see how they look tonight, if the Spurs have improved which I honestly believe they have, we should start beating these losing teams by at least double digits.

    GO SPURS GO

  • ThatBigGuy

    How can I impress upon all you “glass half empty” folks that learning a brand new system is extremely difficult?

    For my junior and senior seasons of college, we got a new coach, who taught us a true hybrid defense, mating aspects of zone D with man-to-man D, and then implemented a total of 65 offensive plays. I was literally the 5th best post, but got 3rd most playing time because 2 All-Conference guys just could not grasp the complexity of the offense or defense for an entire season!

    We were a .500 ball club heading into conference play, mainly because the entire team struggled to grasp the coach’s ideas. The only guy who knew everything perfectly was a Polish guy who studied the playbook for 2 hours every night and did walk throughs, by himself, at night in the gym. However, we started to figure things out and tore our conference up on our way to the national tourney.

    The point is, I’ve been in this situation multiple times due to transfers and coaching changes. Adjusting is real and it’s not easy. Being a “veteran” guy doesn’t give them a leg up when changing teams. It actually hurts them because they have 10 years of systems to forget in order to play the Spurs’ system properly.

    Panic after the Rodeo Road Trip, not 20 games into the season.

  • TD21Forever

    I’m with you,Greg December 8th, 2009 at 9:55 am. I know this confusion comes from adding new players, but Pop has to start making things work…well pointed. If I’m Pop, I will let Tony & Manu start from the bench to ease their ankies back to 100% or even take some games off. My starting lineup Hill,RJ,Blair,McDyess,Duncan (give us everything you got in the first half) My starting lineup in the second half of the ball game (yes, I call it starting lineup, no more bench-players for SPURS:) Tony,Mason,Manu,Bonner,Theo,and whoever can “protect the ball” and “threaten the needles & finding open-man”…….. OK Pop, is time to make-up your mind, we just cannot get killed every third & fourth quarters…if our team’s older why not play with 2 units so they can give 100% of their efferts and not to worry about running out of stamina:) it’s a new concept but sence NBA’s traveling rules can changed from 2 steps to 3 1/2 steps, so fans can watch K.James fly high…lOl I said we can be the first team to play 2 starting lineups in a game….And to RJ, you better attack the rim and get on the line…or prety soon you will be on the Most Wanted Trade Me Please List =_= Go SPURS Go!!!

  • SpurredOn

    @ThatBigGuy – well said. Very well said.

    It’s not even Christmas folks. Yes, I too am angered that we’ve lost nail biters at home (again) to Boston. And at home (again) to OKC. And home to Denver. Plus in Portland. And are 0-3 against a Jazz team that is noway better than S.A. But it’s early December. Beating these teams after the new year, and more importantly after Tax Day, is what counts. Last season it felt great to win early season games against the Lakers and a blowout win in Denver; then injuries took over and it meant nothing late. I’ll take the reverse this season.

  • SAS

    It’s not important how they are playing against loosing teams. the important is how they are playing against main winning teams for example they lost 3 games against Jazz. if we face jazz in the playoffs match consider the jazz team confident. they are very much confident you know why they already beat this team 3 times. confident increases their winning percentage their energy level and everybody know the confident is crucial role in NBA. you know thats why suns are not winning in playoffs against the spurs eventhough they are number one in west years ago, because spurs are very confident in beating suns. so confident is very important and i am still very confident that spurs are number one in west. GO SPURS GO…..

  • Marcus

    The supporting cast has definitely struggled. Which is Duncan’s fault. As he is supposed to be making those players better. Well, that was what Spurs fans always said about Kobe from 05-07, at least, when he was playing with Smush, Kwame and Brian Cook, compared to a former Finals MVP, Richard Jefferson, etc. Oh, blaming superstars for their teammates sucking is a stupid thing to do and shouldn’t be used to criticize them? Exactly.

  • junierizzle

    Why hasn’t anyone said:

    It’s not how you start, it’s how you finish.

    Oh yeah, Im pumped.

    But if we are still playing like this after the rodeo trip, god help us.

  • mvg03

    I love Bruce Bowen as much as the next spurs fan. but cmon now…resigning him or bringing him back is just ridiculous.

  • Pingback: The 10-man rotation, starring Chris Kaman’s medicine cabinet | Hot NBA Videos.com

  • Pingback: The 10-man rotation, starring Chris Kaman’s medicine cabinet | Hot NBA Videos.com

  • Kevin

    One thing I do like about this blog (and its comments section) is that literally EVERY possibility is explored and discussed. Maybe we can bring back the Admiral?

  • buns

    George Gervin might be a bargain.

  • http://www.goodtimescomic.blogspot.com Jordan

    Gervin’s been doing some HEB commercials, maybe he’s still in shape…

  • Pingback: The Spurs Might Be Broke | 48 Minutes of Hell