Spurs’ Struggles Bring on Early Breaking Point for Fans

by

The sky started falling around San Antonio in the wake of what might have been the worst loss of the season for the Spurs. Not around the team, but the fans.

It doesn’t help matters that Skip Bayless apparently climbed up in his First Take chair and said something about Tony Parker needing to lose weight when I’d be willing to bet he hasn’t been in the same area code as Parker this season, let alone the same locker room. Yet Twitter mentions and comment sections reveal that many readers and listeners have accepted this as an actual problem.

It doesn’t help that a local columnist scribbled words built on bad jokes and a premise based in something closer to La La Land than reality, and then later added a line of text that simultaneously flubbed said premise and gave him an excuse to pass it off as tongue-in-cheek. (Another person who hasn’t stepped foot in the AT&T Center for a Spurs game this season, by the way.)

It doesn’t help that too many people watch that junk and read that crap before melding the same talking points into their own arguments. Which is unfortunate, because in doing so you’re only making yourself an inferior debate opponent.

San Antonio’s loss on Monday night in Utah was brutal to watch (though, it should be said, the Spurs rarely ever play well in Utah). Tony Parker can’t beat anyone off the dribble anymore; Boris Diaw has become virtually nonexistent except as a last-ditch spot-up shooter; Tiago Splitter has been noticeably worse than last season on both sides of the ball and is now a regular fixture behind Aron freaking Baynes on the depth chart; Kawhi Leonard is struggling offensively because everybody else is and he isn’t a No. 1 offensive option. It’s all a vicious cycle.

Parker’s numbers have plummeted as a pick-and-roll ball-handler. He’s registered just .79 points per possession in these situations — which is in the NBA’s 58th percentile, and worse than Tyreke Evans (sorry, random-name generator) — a drop-off of roughly .14 PPP from last season, per NBA Synergy data. The eye test alone can tell you he hasn’t been right since injuring his hamstring roughly 12 weeks ago; but after that amount of time has passed, it’s fair to wonder at this point whether or not that is the actual reason for this deep lull.

From here, it’s easy to concoct a theory for San Antonio’s awful play. Without Parker’s penetration and without Diaw’s exceptional ability to act as a secondary playmaker from the post, everything looks difficult for the Spurs. Their pace is down, they’re holding onto the ball longer and shooting later in the shot clock, and the number of catch-and-shoot jumpers (their bread and butter) has dropped, per SportVU data. San Antonio is working harder on offense than it has in years, only to find worse shots than it’s regularly taken in quite some time.

But there is something interesting about another story the numbers have told — one that doesn’t exactly line up with what your eyes have revealed.

Despite Parker’s inability to find his way to the basket regularly, the Spurs are actually driving into the paint more often this season (30.9 drives per game) than they did last season (23.6 drives per game). A lot of this has to do with the fact that the initial attack hasn’t always worked and they’ve been forced to back it out and try again, but this hasn’t hurt the team’s efficiency on such plays.

San Antonio is generating .95 points per possession on drives so far this season, good for sixth best in the league; last year, the Spurs averaged .90 points per possession on drives. So not only are they driving more often, they’re doing so more efficiently.

Another thing the numbers are saying: The Spurs are getting plenty of open shots, and they’re just missing them. Per SportVU data, the team is launching 19.6 open 3-pointers per game (where the defender isn’t within four feet of the shooter), up from 18.2 last season, but is only connecting on 37.2 percent of them. During San Antonio’s title run, that number was at 40.1 percent.

It’s amazing how bad a team can look when open shots aren’t falling. It makes it feel as if all the positives are masked. You’re used to watching the Spurs hit those looks, so when they don’t go in, it’s like a punch in the gut. Missed open 3-pointers, especially for a team that’s been among the very best in that department for years, can feel like a huge letdown — a missed chance at gaining momentum.

There is no question this team has problems. As Parker stumbles around the court, as Diaw floats around the perimeter, and as Splitter continues to lose minutes to Baynes, San Antonio has seen its field-goal percentage at the basket fall from 64.3 last season to 59.6 this year (48.6 to 45.5 overall), per NBA.com.

And to be fair, we’ve seen the sort of physical toll deep playoff runs have taken on teams throughout history. San Antonio’s made it at least as far as the Western Conference Finals in three consecutive seasons, and you don’t have to look too far back to see how taxing that can be. The need to jump off the proverbial cliff has become all too tempting for Spurs fans, and I do understand the sentiment in that capacity.

The HEAT were a shell of themselves last June, as the Spurs, driven by anger and fueled by revenge, simply picked them apart in five games. Miami looked spent, and one might say San Antonio appears that way this season. But there’s a significant difference between these Spurs and those HEAT. Despite all the bad offense and missed shots, San Antonio still boasts the sixth-best defense in the league, just .1 points per 100 possessions behind an elite Memphis group. And make no mistake about it: Bad offense absolutely hurts your defense and its ability to set up properly in the half-court.

By the time the Celtics’ late-2000s run of contention was over, its defensive rating had dropped from 95.5 in 2011-12 to 100.4 the next season; before the Heat’s world came crashing down last summer, the defense allowed nearly three points per 100 possessions more to opponents during the regular season than it had the previous year — in a really weak Eastern Conference, mind you. Their defensive rating of 102.9 last year would’ve been good for 15th in the league this season.

That hasn’t happened in San Antonio, however. The Spurs’ 100.1 defensive rating is identical to last season’s, and much of it has been done with a roster that’s been in flux more often this year than last. If this were not the case, and if this defense was sitting closer to the middle of the pack than the front of the line, I’d be less inclined to stop you from edging too close to the cliff. But perhaps the most common thread among NBA Finals winners is a top defense, and one of the greatest indicators of athletic and team decline is a drop-off on that side of the ball.

Still, if the Spurs are going through this sort of offensive grind come playoff time, it might take divine intervention to help flip the switch. Even then, I’m not sure it can be done. Parker has to return to form, and postseason Diaw and Splitter must figure out what’s ailing them for their team to have any chance, but an offense that’s missing open shots in February is much more fixable than a defense that’s leaking points with two months left in the season.

In general, San Antonio is still biding its time. Despite being the 7th seed and facing what could be the team’s first ever losing Rodeo Road Trip (one more loss ensures this), Gregg Popovich is still watching his players’ minutes. Kawhi Leonard’s 31 minutes per game leads the team, and no other player is even at the 30-minute mark.

If you want to jump off now, as many of you have, that’s fine. The talking heads are giving you plenty of reason to do so. And I’m certain this comment section will cast aside the things I’ve written here as excuses. But, in all areas of life, equity is a real thing. This team has earned the benefit of the doubt, and if you subscribe to that theory, then you’re being disingenuous if you bail now.

I find it funny that, year after year, one of the major talking points you hear in analysis of the Spurs is they don’t care about the regular season. Yet, as soon as they struggle more than anticipated during the middle months of the season or fail to maintain a 60-win pace, the criticism and declaration of their demise becomes heavy.

The Spurs-fan breaking point seems to have been reached. But with 26 games still to play in the regular season and only four games separating the 3rd seed from the 7th, it sure feels a bit early for the sky to be falling.


  • Jamie Carroll

    i hope you’re right, but Parker and Diaw both just look done. I can’t remember Parker ever looking this bad before. Agree that the missed open 3s are maddening. I’m just so used to those going in.

  • brunostrange

    So Skip Bayless is saying that Parker needs to lose weight? Presumably because that’s what Duncan did, and I guess, what’s good for a seven-footer is good for a 6’2″ point guard? Man, am I glad I stopped watching ESPN when the shouting-heads took over the network.

    Great analysis, btw. I’m definitely in the sky-is-falling camp, though I attribute my pessimism to the simple fact that the deep runs have taken their time on an aging core, as they would inevitably would. There’s no shame in that, given the enormous success of this team, and the joy they’ve brought their fans.

    I was unaware of the defensive numbers, which are certainly cause for optimism, as long as the shots begin to fall at some point. I suppose that’s something one can hang their hat on.

    One minor quibble:

    “year after year, one of the major talking points you hear in analysis of the Spurs is they don’t care about the regular season.”

    I think that’s more myth than anything. SA has been a top (or top 2) seed for the past several years. That’s hardly the mark of a team that doesn’t care about the regular season.

  • junierizzle

    I’m glad the defensive numbers are good. But these last three games haven’t passed the eyeball test. I’ve never seen them give up so many layups and backdoor cuts before. I’m not concerned with fastbreaks so much because that stems from the bad offense like the article states.

    They said Parker’s trouble is mostly mental, right? Maybe he is still pacing himself because he looked good against Clippers and Detroit.

    I think Diaw will be fine. He looked good against GSW before the wheels came off.

    My main concern is that they need the 4th spot to have at least one home series.

  • Sean M

    Good stuff by Matthew here.
    I am in the sky-is-falling camp, but more from a simple nostaligic perspective. This season would be very difficult to endure as a Spurs fan without the way the Spurs cememented Duncan’s legacy with the 2014 finals win. Everything that went into last year’s playoff run felt really sweet for this dynasty (oh, snap…”dynasty” alert), from beating the Mavs in a tough series, quickly dispensing Portland, and then getting revenge on the 2 teams who punched the Spurs out the previous 2 years.
    I look at this season as a natural progression of the physical and emotional toll these guys must have felt since the 2011-2012 season. That playoff run, the Spurs were on an insane winning streak, chopping right through the Jazz and Clippers before running into the insolvable mess that was the OKC Thunder. Just had no answer for Harden and when Thabo Selfoloosha and pre-2013 Serge Ibaka go 18-20 from the field in game 5, I mean, what the heck were the Spurs supposed to do? I still think the Spurs were the best team in the NBA that year. The 2013 playoff run was even more difficult to swallow.
    So, here we are in 2015. As a Spurs homer, I would argue the Spurs were the best team in the NBA each year since 2011-2012. So Tony has seen a huge decline, and Manu is wildly inconsistent, and while Tim Duncan is a stalwart of consistency, the “role players” who played so well in last year’s finals run have not been the same, for whatever reason. So I wathced the Spurs get trucked by a mediocre Utah team with an air of nostalgia. Is it over for the Spurs? Maybe. Is that the worst thing in the world? Not even close. The legacy is sealed. Pop is on anybody’s Mount Rushmore of coaches. TD is the best “power forward” [cough, cough] of all time, and Tony and Manu are future Hall of Famers. Rest easy, Spurs fans, and enjoy this as the close of the good old days. We are going to be telling our grandkids about these Spurs teams in 40 years.

  • Spurs Suck

    It’s not early. The spurs suck. Open your eyes.

  • hoopsaf

    I don’t see any way Spurs have a chance in the playoffs if, as Gregg Popovich said, they ‘need’ Tony Parker of the past. If Pop keeps playing Parker hoping for that miracle, Spurs are done, period. Tony has been the worst player in the team other than Austin Daye, and I don’t see any sign that’s going to change.

    The only chance Spurs have is if the torch gets passed from Tony (should be relegated to a bench role) to Cory Joseph. Even then, it’s not likely this team can beat the likes of GSW, but that’s what will give them the best chance. But I’m not sure if that will happen as Pop seems set on playing Tony as much as possible, even if Tony stinks up the joint for the rest of the season.

    Any lack of offensive creativity in Cojo’s part, he makes up for it with much better defense/rebounding and actual penetration that works.

  • Jwill1919

    How was the game tonight Matthew? How did Parker look? It’s ok to be a realist, just because you’re a Spurs fan doesn’t mean you have to be a Homer!

  • Emil E. Matula III

    The torch needs to be passed, but not to Joseph. Patty Mills needs to take it and run.

  • ferscia

    I agree with Tynan that TP has still 25 games to figure it out. Cory and Patty are excellent backup point guards, but the Spurs don´t have a chance for another ring without TP. If come playoffs time he´s not playing well, just then I´d throw the towel and start Patty or Cory.

  • Comrade747

    I believe in my Spurs.

  • http://www.reverbnation.com/santonesmusic Patrick Sigel

    jump off the bandwagon cliff, children-more room for real fans. go spurs! : )

  • Ray Briggs II

    Nothing could make me bail on the Spurs. Nothing. But the flaws pointed out in this article are very real and very concerning. Parker’s play specifically really worries me. Even though he didn’t put up gaudy numbers last year he is the straw that stirs the drink, the engine that runs the buzzsaw that the Spurs offense can be. Between him and Mills playing worse than last year the Spurs have been a shell of what they can be. I still hold out hope they can get it together before what will surely be one of toughest first round series they have ever faced.

  • KevinO

    Kudos to Matthew and all of the 48MOH cast for your quality articles and research, all done in your spare time. Matthew, I must admit, I thought of you being a bit a Negative Nelly at times regarding the Spurs-sorry, but you picked against the Spurs in multiple playoffs!-but this is well needed, and positive rationale.

    We are hands down the most spoiled fan base in the NBA. Think of how good the Patriots have been during this era. We have one more championship than they do. And the ridiculous fact is, we could have a potentially ludicrous amount of championships if some lucky breaks, idiotic fouls, and bizarre substitutions had not occurred. Just check out our neighbors up north for a reality check. They have one championship during the Nowitski era. And it’s falling apart again for them even with freaking Rondo at the point. (They should have never traded Nash, but that’s a topic for another day). The point is, things could be worse. So even though this year has been a lot of No, Spurs, No! True fans stand by their team, not just through all of the easy winning years, but especially when the going gets tough.

    We know Pop and the front office will figure it out sooner than later. We might even get a decent draft pick out of this for once and reload for next year.

  • TitletownX5

    Ok Matthew so Tiago sucks and last year as well. Your re-******. First off if it wasn’t for Tiago last season’s playoff defensive show against Aldridge and Nowitzki there is no getting to the big show. You see the way I look at it the same damn thing is happening to Tiago when Blair was here. CIA Pop experimented, and experimented and experimented with Blair at Tiago’s expense until that old man got it in his head that Splitter was a way better fit for this system than Blair was. Enter 2015 Baynes is the next Blair. I didn’t even watch the spurs when Tiago was hurt until he came back and then I waited and waited and waited for him to get his usual -15-25 minutes depending on the matchups but it never came. And now we continue to see the dunk one time a game show from Baynes ooohh. Let alone the slowness that is his game. He gets beat alot and can’t defend like Splitter does when Splitter was in his groove. Listen here I said groove. Yes Groooove. You can’t get in a groove if your collecting pine on your a$$. Same thing happened when Balir was eating up minutes bringing “energy to the floor” (please) and were complaining about Splitter. How did that work out for Blair and this team. I have been saying this since Tiago got to the Spurs he is a type of player that needs lots of minutes to get the best out of him. If you don’t want to use him anymore Pop trade him to the Warriors. Yeah right. The worst write up I’ve seen from this rag. That’s probably why I haven’t step foot here in about a year. See you next year.

  • ray

    He never said that Splitter sucked last year. He simply is comparing Splitter’s play this year to last year and saying that splitter is playing worse than last year judging by stats.

  • Suave Groove

    “The Spurs are getting plenty of open shots, and they’re just missing them. Per SportVU data, the team is launching 19.6 open 3-pointers per game (where the defender isn’t within four feet of the shooter), up from 18.2 last season, but is only connecting on 37.2 percent of them. During San Antonio’s title run, that number was at 40.1 percent.”
    ^ It would be interesting to know how they produced that 1.4 increase in open shots. It can be as much as a better passing offense or the defender thinking: “they’re trash this season from deep, he wont score”.

  • bob sachamanno

    such a smart guy who still doesn’t really understand basketball. Shots aren’t just missing their mark. It’s a question of flow and synchrony with the parts. It’s all unconscious. They won’t just begin to fall my friend. Sorry.

  • Veritas Vincit

    nice idea…. Patty Mills = 2015 nba finals MVP.

  • Veritas Vincit

    who cares about putting Pop’s giant face in the grand canyon…we have to watch tony parker for 3 more years after this season!?

  • Tyler

    “Listen here I said groove. Yes Groooove.”

    Fantastic

  • Ed Yates

    Parker is a stumbling, bumbling anchor. Everyone else can break out of whatever funk they are in. Parker, however, just looks pathetic. Seeing how he’s not sitting I must assume he’s healthy and he is, in fact, killing the Spurs.

  • hoopsaf

    I don’t agree. Spurs won some important playoff games last year without Tony Parker (e.g. game 6 against OKC).

    It’s reverse. They have a better chance without this TP rather than with him.